Difference between revisions of "Analysis"

From New IAC Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
Line 1: Line 1:
[http://www.jlab.org/~shifeng EG1 run database ]<br>
+
[[Particle Identification]]<br>
[http://www.jlab.org/~claseg1/eg1summ.html run summary]<br>
+
[[Quality Checks]]<br>
[http://www.jlab.org/Hall-B/secure/eg1/EG2000/fersch/QUALITY_CHECKS/file_quality/runinfo.txt polarization info]<br>
 
  
=Particle Identification=
+
[[EG1_Teleconferences_DeltaDoverD]]
==Electron==
 
  
=== Cuts ===
+
[[http://wiki.iac.isu.edu/index.php/Delta_D_over_D Back to Delta_D_over_D]]
  
==== Calorimeter based cuts====
 
The distributions below represent two types of cuts applied to improve the electron particle identification (PID) using a 4 GeV electron beam incident on an NH3 target.  The electron calorimeter is segmented into an inner<math>EC_{inner}</math> and an outer<math>EC_{outer}</math> region.  The total energy absorbed by the calorimeter system is recorded in the variable <math>EC_{tot}</math>.  The momentum (<math>P</math>) is calculated using the reconstructed track and the known torus magnetic field.  The distributions of <math>EC_{tot}</math> and <math>EC_{inner}</math> are shown below where both have been divided by the electron momentum and no cuts have been applied.
 
  
 +
[[ phi angle in CM frame for different runs]]<br>
  
 
+
[[some things]]
=====<math>EC_{tot}>0.2*p</math>=====
 
 
 
 
 
Without any cuts we have 181018 entries. After using the following cut <math>EC_{tot}>0.2*p</math> we are getting 127719 entries, which is about 70.55% of 181018. <br>
 
 
 
[[Image:Etotal_P_using_tot_cut.gif | 200 px]]  
 
[[Image:Einner_P_using_tot_cut.gif | 200 px]]<br>
 
 
 
=====<math>EC_{inner}>0.08*p</math>=====
 
 
 
 
 
After the cut on the energy deposited into inner part of electron calorimeter, number of entries decreases by 22%.<br>
 
 
 
[[Image:Etotal_P_using_inner_cut.gif | 200 px]] [[Image:Einner_P_using_inner_cut.gif | 200 px]]<br>
 
 
 
=====Both cuts <math>  EC_{tot}>0.2*p </math> and <math> EC_{inner}>0.08*p  </math>=====
 
 
 
In case of using the cuts of the total deposited energy and the energy deposited into inner calorimeter number of entries decreases ~36% <br>
 
 
 
[[Image:Etotal_P_using_both_cuts.gif | 200 px]]
 
[[Image:Einner_P_using_both_cuts.gif | 200 px]]<br>
 
 
 
====summary table====
 
 
 
The "# of triggers" columns represents the number of events which generated a signal above threshold in the calorimeter and the scintillator.  The expected # of events column represents the number of reconstructed events with tracks that also make it through the cuts defined in the table.
 
 
 
The semi-inclusive analysis will focus on the 4 GeV and 6 GeV data which have both inbending and outbending torus settings.  Specifically runs 28074 - 28579 ( 4 GeV) and Runs 27356 - 27499 and 26874 - 27198 (6 GeV)
 
 
 
 
 
{|border="2" colspan = "20"
 
!Beam Energy||Torus Current||Begin Run||End Run ||file used || cuts || || || # trig(<math>10^6</math>) || expected # evts(<math>10^6</math>)||p<3,<math>EC_{tot}>0.2*p </math>,<math> EC_{inner}>0.08*p</math>(%)||p>3,<math>EC_{tot}>0.24*p </math>,<math> EC_{inner}>0.06*p</math>(%)
 
|-
 
| || || || || || <math>EC_{tot}>0.2*p</math> || <math>EC_{inner}>0.08*p</math>|| <math>EC_{tot}>0.2*p </math> and <math> EC_{inner}>0.08*p</math>|| || || ||
 
|-
 
|1606||1500||25488||25559||dst25504_02.B00||64%||49.5%||78%||60||3.2
 
|-
 
|1606||1946||25560||25605|| || ||44
 
|-
 
|1606||1500||25669||25732||dst25669_02.B00||64%||49%||78%||226||10
 
|-
 
|1606||1500||25742||26221||dst25754_02.B00||21%||11%||24%||3154||13.3
 
|-
 
|1606||-1500||26222||26359||dst26224_02.B00||4.6%||3%||6.6%||703||13.1
 
|-
 
|1724||-1500||27644||27798||dst27649_02.B00||4.8%||2.2%||5.9%||211||20
 
|-
 
|1724||1500||28512||28526|| || ||159
 
|-
 
|1724||-1500||28527||28532|| || ||93
 
|-
 
|2288||1500||27205||27351||dst27225_02.B00||20.2%||13%||25.6%||1647||16.1
 
|-
 
|2562||-1500||27799||27924||dst27809_02.B00||5.7%||4.6%||8.6%||1441||13.1
 
|-
 
|2562||-1500||27942||27995||dst27942_02.B00||6.1%||4.4%||8.9%||841||32.3
 
|-
 
|2562||1500||28001||28069||dst28002_02.B00||27.8%||13%||29.6%||1013||30.7
 
|-
 
|2792||-1500||27936||27941||dst27937_02.B00||6.7%||5%||9.9%||69||20.6
 
|-
 
|3210||-2250||28549||28570|| || ||436
 
|-
 
|4239||2250||28074||28277||dst28075_02.B00||35.3%||23.9%||40.5%||2278||19.6
 
|-
 
|4239||-2250||28280||28479||dst28281_02.B00||9.1%||9.4%||13.6%||2620||15.2
 
|-
 
|4239||2250||28482||28494|| || ||7
 
|-
 
|4239||-2250||28500||28505|| || ||107
 
|-
 
|4239||2250||28506||28510||dst28509_02.B00||29.5%||22%||36%||75||18.1
 
|-
 
|5627||2250||27356||27364||dst27358_02.B00||33.2%||27.8%||41.3%||56||19.4||44.6||40.1
 
|-
 
|5627||-2250||27366||27380||dst27368_02.B00||12.6%||14.8%||19.5%||130||13.6||25.3||8.8
 
|-
 
|5627||2250||27386||27499||dst27388_02.B00||33.4%||27.8%||41.4%||1210||20.2||44.8||40.1
 
|-
 
|5627||965||27502||27617|| || ||493
 
|-
 
|5735||-2250||26874||27068||dst26904_02.B00||13%||15%||20%||1709||19.9||25.6||9.1
 
|-
 
|5735||2250||27069||27198||dst27070_02.B00||33.3%||28.8%||42.2%||1509||15||46||40.2
 
|-
 
|5764||-2250||26468||26722||dst26489_02.B00||12.2%||14.4%||19.1%||1189||10||24.6||9.3
 
|-
 
|5764||0||26723||26775|| || ||268
 
|-
 
|5764||-2250||26776||26851||dst26779_02.B00||13.5%||15.5%||20.5%||662||15.9||26.4||9.2
 
|}
 
 
 
====Cut on the number of photoelectrons====
 
 
 
 
 
In this case is used a cut on the number of photoelectrons, which is <math>nphe>2.5</math>. The plots below show the 
 
effect of the number of photoelectrons cuts on the Cerenkov distribution. We see that after using cut the number of entries decreases ~40.7%
 
<br>
 
 
[[Image:nphe_before_cut_file_27070.gif|200px]]  [[Image:nphe1_after_cut_file_27070.gif|200px]]<br>
 
 
 
 
 
Used cuts <math>EC_{tot}>0.24p</math> and <math>EC_{inner}>0.06p</math><br>
 
 
 
 
 
[[Image:nphe_before_electron_cuts_file_27070.gif|200px]]  [[Image:nphe1_after_electron_cuts_file_27070.gif|200px]]<br>
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Used file dst28181_03(energy 4.2GeV). In this case was applied cuts on the polar angle(<math>15<\theta<20</math>) and momentum(<math>2.2<P<2.6</math>). Number of entries decreased by 96%(?????????????/)<br>
 
 
 
 
 
[[Image:nphe_before_cuts_file_28181.gif|200px]]  [[Image:nphe1_after_cuts_file_28181.gif|200px]]<br>
 
 
 
[http://www.jlab.org/Hall-B/secure/eg1/EG2000/nevzat/UPGRADE_DST/ Tamuna: follow this link to see the OSIPENKO cuts described in part 5 add graphs of their effect below]
 
Dr. Forest I think I did this cuts but they do not change a lot. Maybe I am wrong.
 
 
 
====Plot of <math>EC_{tot}/p</math> vs <math>EC_{inner}/p</math>====
 
 
 
In this case is used file dst27070(Energy 5.735 GeV and Torus 2250) and are applied the following EC cuts: For ECtotal - <math>EC_{tot}>0.2p</math>, for EC inner - <math>EC_{inner}>0.08p</math>.<br>
 
 
 
=====P<3=====
 
 
 
After using above cuts the number of entries decreases ~46%<br>
 
 
 
[[Image:e_total_vs_e_inner1_before_cuts_file_dst27070.gif|200px]]
 
[[Image:e_total_vs_e_inner1_after_cuts_file_dst27070.gif|200px]]<br>
 
 
 
=====0.5<P<1=====
 
The number of entries decreased by ~51.8%<br>
 
 
 
[[Image:e_total_vs_e_inner1_before_cuts_P1_file_dst27070.gif|200px]]
 
[[Image:e_total_vs_e_inner1_after_cuts_P1_file_dst27070.gif|200px]]<br>
 
 
 
=====1<P<1.5=====
 
 
 
The number of entries decreased approximately by 47.8%<br>
 
 
[[Image:e_total_vs_e_inner1_before_cuts_P1.5_file_dst27070.gif|200px]]
 
[[Image:e_total_vs_e_inner1_after_cuts_P1.5_file_dst27070.gif|200px]]<br>
 
 
 
=====1.5<P<2=====
 
 
 
In this case the number of entries decreased by 46.1%<br>
 
 
 
[[Image:e_total_vs_e_inner1_before_cuts_P2_file_dst27070.gif|200px]]
 
[[Image:e_total_vs_e_inner1_after_cuts_P2_file_dst27070.gif|200px]]<br>
 
 
 
=====2<P<2.5=====
 
 
 
In this case the number of entries decreased by 38%<br>
 
 
 
[[Image:e_total_vs_e_inner1_before_cuts_P2.5_file_dst27070.gif|200px]]
 
[[Image:e_total_vs_e_inner1_after_cuts_P2.5_file_dst27070.gif|200px]]<br>
 
 
 
=====P>3=====
 
 
 
Used file dst27070(Energy 5.735 GeV and Torus 2250) and are applied the following EC cuts: For ECtotal - <math>EC_{tot}>0.24p</math>, for EC inner - <math>EC_{inner}>0.06p</math>.<br>
 
 
 
The number of entries decreased by~40.2%<br>
 
 
 
[[Image:e_total_vs_e_inner1_before_cuts_P3_file_dst27070.gif|200px]]
 
[[Image:e_total_vs_e_inner1_after_cuts_P3_file_dst27070.gif|200px]]<br>
 
 
 
====Plot of EC_tot/P vs nphe for Electrons====
 
Used file dst27070(Energy 5.735 GeV and Torus 2250)<br>
 
=====p<3 GeV=====
 
 
 
[[Image:e_total_vs_nphe_momentum_cut_file_dst27070.gif|200px]]<br>
 
 
 
=====p<3 GeV and <math>EC_{inner}>0.08p</math>=====
 
 
 
[[Image:e_total_P_vs_nphe_momentum_Ec_inner_cuts_file_dst27070.gif|200px]]<br>
 
 
 
=====p<3 GeV, <math>EC_{inner}>0.08p</math> and <math>EC_{tot}>0.2p</math>=====
 
 
 
[[Image:e_total_P_vs_nphe_momentum_EC_inner_EC_total_cuts_file_dst27070.gif|200px]]<br>
 
 
 
=====p<3 GeV, <math>EC_{inner}>0.08p</math>, <math>EC_{tot}>0.2p</math> and nphe>2.5=====
 
 
 
[[Image:e_total_P_vs_nphe_momentum_EC_inner_EC_total_nphe_cuts_file_dst27070.gif|200px]]<br>
 
 
 
 
 
The first histogram is for electrons and the other one for pions<br>
 
 
 
[[Image:e_total_vs_nphe_electrons_file_dst27070.gif|200px]]
 
[[Image:e_total_vs_nphe_pions_file_dst27070.gif|200px]]<br>
 
 
 
==Pion==
 
 
 
===Summary Table===
 
 
 
Tamuna: 
 
The pion id code is at:
 
 
 
http://www.jlab.org/Hall-B/secure/eg1/EG2000/josh/pion.cc
 
 
 
There are two subroutines, one which uses a constant cut for every paddle,
 
one that has a different cut for every paddle.  The only other requirement
 
is that the particle be produced with an angle less than 48 degrees in the
 
  lab (so as to miss the magnet can).  The requirment that the pion fail the
 
electron cut is not written in stone.  I still haven't checked to see the
 
effects of it.
 
 
 
  Dr. Forest: I saw the pion id code. They have variables like start_time
 
and path_length. I do not know how define them. What should i use for
 
start time.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
{|border="2" colspan = "20"
 
!Beam Energy||Torus Current||Begin Run||End Run ||file used || cuts || || || # trig(<math>10^6</math>) || expected # evts(<math>10^6</math>)||p>3,<math>EC_{tot}<0.2*p </math>,<math> EC_{inner}<0.08*p</math>(%)||p<3,<math>EC_{tot}<0.24*p </math>,<math> EC_{inner}<0.06*p</math>(%)
 
|-
 
| || || || || || <math>EC_{tot}>0.2*p</math> || <math>EC_{inner}>0.08*p</math>|| <math>EC_{tot}>0.2*p </math> and <math> EC_{inner}>0.08*p</math>|| || || ||
 
|-
 
|1606||1500||25488||25559||dst25504_02.B00|| || || ||60||3.2
 
|-
 
|1606||1500||25669||25732||dst25669_02.B00|| || || ||226||10
 
|-
 
|1606||1500||25742||26221||dst25754_02.B00|| || || ||3154||13.3
 
|-
 
|1606||-1500||26222||26359||dst26224_02.B00|| || || ||703||13.1
 
|-
 
|1724||-1500||27644||27798||dst27649_02.B00|| || || ||211||20
 
|-
 
|2288||1500||27205||27351||dst27225_02.B00|| || || ||1647||16.1
 
|-
 
|2562||-1500||27799||27924||dst27809_02.B00|| || || ||1441||13.1
 
|-
 
|2562||-1500||27942||27995||dst27942_02.B00|| || || ||841||32.3
 
|-
 
|2562||1500||28001||28069||dst28002_02.B00|| || || ||1013||30.7
 
|-
 
|2792||-1500||27936||27941||dst27937_02.B00|| || || %||69||20.6
 
|-
 
|4239||2250||28074||28277||dst28075_02.B00|| %|| %|| %||2278||19.6
 
|-
 
|4239||-2250||28280||28479||dst28281_02.B00|| %|| %|| %||2620||15.2
 
|-
 
|4239||2250||28506||28510||dst28509_02.B00|| %|| %|| %||75||18.1
 
|-
 
|5627||2250||27356||27364||dst27358_02.B00|| %|| %|| %||56||19.4||36.1||31.5
 
|-
 
|5627||-2250||27366||27380||dst27368_02.B00|| %|| %|| %||130|| ||25||43.8 
 
|-
 
|5627||2250||27386||27499||dst27388_02.B00|| %|| %|| %||1210||20.2||39.8||32.4 
 
|-
 
|5735||-2250||26874||27068||dst26904_02.B00|| %|| %|| %||1709||19.9||22.5||46.4 
 
|-
 
|5735||2250||27069||27198||dst27070_02.B00|| %|| %|| %||1509||15||34.6||32.9 
 
|-
 
|5764||-2250||26468||26722||dst26489_02.B00|| %|| %|| %||1189||10||25.2||44.3 
 
|-
 
|5764||-2250||26776||26851||dst26779_02.B00|| %|| %|| %||662||15.9||21.3||44
 
|}
 
 
 
=Quality Checks=
 
==Rates==
 
==Asymmetries==
 

Latest revision as of 18:49, 13 January 2009