Difference between revisions of "Analysis"

From New IAC Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(66 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
[http://www.jlab.org/~shifeng EG1 run database ]<br>
+
[[Particle Identification]]<br>
−
[http://www.jlab.org/~claseg1/eg1summ.html run summary]<br>
+
[[Quality Checks]]<br>
−
[http://www.jlab.org/Hall-B/secure/eg1/EG2000/fersch/QUALITY_CHECKS/file_quality/runinfo.txt polarization info]<br>
 
  
−
=Particle Identification=
+
[[EG1_Teleconferences_DeltaDoverD]]
−
==Cherenkov==
 
−
===Cherenkov Theory===
 
−
   
 
−
When the velocity of a charged particle is greater than the local phase velocity of light or when it enters a medium  with different optical properties the charged particle will emit photons.  The Cherenkov light is emitted under a constant angle <math>\theta_c</math> - the angle of Cherenkov radiation relative to the particle's direction. It can be shown geometrically that the cosine of the Cherenkov radiation angle is anti-proportional to the velocity of the  charged particle<br>
 
  
−
<math>cos \theta_c=\frac{1}{n \beta}</math><br>
+
[[http://wiki.iac.isu.edu/index.php/Delta_D_over_D Back to Delta_D_over_D]]
  
−
where <math>\beta c</math> is the particle's velocity and n - index of refraction of the medium.The charged particle in time t travels <math>\beta c t</math> distance, while the electromagnetic waves - <math>\frac{c}{n}t</math>. For a medium with given index of refraction n there is a threshold velocity <math>\beta_{thr}=\frac{1}{n}</math>, below <math>\beta_{thr}</math> no radiation can take place.  This process may be used to observe the passage of charged particles in a detector which can measure the produced photons.<br>
 
  
−
The number of photons produced per unit path length of a particle with charge ze and per unit energy interval of the photons is proportional to the sine of the Cherenkov angle[http://pdg.lbl.gov/2007/reviews/passagerpp.pdf] <br>
+
[[ phi angle in CM frame for different runs]]<br>
  
−
<math>\frac{d^2 N}{dEdx}=\frac{\alpha z^2}{\hbar c}sin ^2 \theta_c=\frac{\alpha z^2}{\hbar c}[1-\frac{1}{\beta^2 n^2 (E)}]</math><br>
+
[[some things]]
−
 
 
−
 
 
−
<math>\frac{d^2 N}{d\lambda dx} = \frac{2 \pi \alpha z^2}{\lambda^2}[1-\frac{1}{\beta^2 n^2 (\lambda)}]</math><br>
 
−
 
 
−
<math>\beta=\frac{v}{c}=\frac{pc}{\sqrt{(pc)^2 + (mc^2)^2}}</math><br>
 
−
 
 
−
after deriving the Taylor expansion of our function and considering only the first two terms, we get<br>
 
−
<math>\frac{d^2 N}{dEdx}=\frac{\alpha z^2}{\hbar c}sin ^2 \theta_c=\frac{\alpha z^2}{\hbar c}[\beta^2 n^2 (E) - 1]</math>
 
−
 
 
−
The gas used in the CLAS Cerenkov counter is perfluorobutane <math>C_4 F_{10}</math> with index of refraction equal to 1.00153.
 
−
 
 
−
 
 
−
 
 
−
====Electrons====
 
−
 
 
−
The calculation of the number of photoelectrons emitted by electrons is shown below.
 
−
Electron mass <math>m_e = 0.000511GeV</math>, <math>n=1.00153</math> and <math>\beta=\frac{p}{E} = 1</math>, because mass of the electron is negligible and also <math>\frac{\alpha}{\hbar c}=370[ eV^{-1} cm^{-1}] </math><br><br>
 
−
The Hall B cherenkov detector is <math>\sim \; 0.7</math> m thick radiator.  We assume the PMTs used to  collect light have a constant quantum efficiency of 8% for photons with wavelength between 300 and 600 nm.
 
−
 
 
−
<math>\frac{dN}{dx} </math> <math>= 2 \pi \alpha z^2 [{\beta^2 n^2 (\lambda)} - 1]\int_{300nm}^{600nm} \frac{1}{\lambda^2} d\lambda \times (0.08)=</math>  <br>
 
−
<math>= 2 \pi \alpha z^2 [{\beta^2 n^2 (\lambda)} - 1] (\frac {1}{\lambda})|_{600nm}^{300nm} \times (0.08) </math>=<br>
 
−
<math>= 2\times 3.14 \times \frac{1}{137} \times 1^2 \times [1.00153^2 - 1] \times \frac{1}{600} \times 0.08 [nm^{-1}] = </math> <br>
 
−
<math>= 19 \times 10^{-9} [nm^{-1}]</math> <br>
 
−
 
 
−
;For the number of photoelectrons we have the following <br>
 
−
<math> N = 19 \times 10^{-9} \times 0.7 m [\frac{10^9}{m}] = 13.3 </math><br>
 
−
 
 
−
That means the number of photoelectrons should be about 13.<br>
 
−
 
 
−
Used file dst27095_05.B00 energy=5.7GeV and torus=2250(B>0). Target NH3<br>
 
−
 
 
−
[[Image:e_momentum_vs_numb_of_photoelectrons_27095_theory.gif|200px]]
 
−
 
 
−
====Pions(<math>\pi^-</math>)====
 
−
 
 
−
 
 
−
The threshold energy for pions is ~2.5 GeV and for electrons 9 MeV.  <br>
 
−
 
 
−
;Example for <math>\pi^-</math> <br>
 
−
 
 
−
<math>m_{\pi^-}=139.57[\frac{MeV}{c^2}]</math>, momentum <math>p=mv=3 [\frac{GeV}{c}]</math> and n=1.00153<br>
 
−
 
 
−
where <math>\frac{\alpha}{\hbar c}=370[ eV^{-1} cm^{-1}] </math><br>
 
−
 
 
−
The Hall B cherenkov detector is <math>\sim \; 0.7</math> m thick radiator.  We assume the PMTs used to  collect light have a constant quantum efficiency of 8% for photons with wavelength between 300 and 600 nm.
 
−
 
 
−
<math>\frac{dN}{dx} = \frac{2 \pi \alpha z^2}{\lambda^2}[1-\frac{1}{\beta^2 n^2 (\lambda)}]=</math> <br>
 
−
<math>= 2 \pi \alpha z^2 [1-\frac{1}{\beta^2 n^2 (\lambda)}]\int_{300nm}^{600nm} \frac{1}{\lambda^2} d\lambda \times (0.08)=</math>  <br>
 
−
<math>= 2 \pi \alpha z^2 [1-\frac{1}{\beta^2 n^2 (\lambda)}] (\frac {1}{\lambda})|_{600nm}^{300nm} \times (0.08) </math>=<br>
 
−
<math>= 2\times 3.14 \times \frac{1}{137} \times 1^2 \times [1-\frac{1}{0.998919^2 \times 1.00153^2}] \times \frac{1}{600} \times 0.08 [nm^{-1}] = </math> <br>
 
−
<math>= 5.465 \times 10^{-9} [nm^{-1}]</math> <br>
 
−
 
 
−
;For the number of photons we have the following(for pions) <br>
 
−
<math> N = 5.465 \times 10^{-9} \times 0.7 m [\frac{10^9}{m}] = 3.8255 </math><br>
 
−
 
 
−
Used file dst27095_05.B00 energy=5.7GeV and torus=2250(B>0). Target NH3<br>
 
−
 
 
−
[[Image:pi_momentum_vs_numb_of_photons_27095_theory.gif|200px]]
 
−
 
 
−
===CLAS Cherenkov signal===
 
−
====Electrons====
 
−
 
 
−
The cherenkov signal measured in CLAS for particles identified as electrons by the tracking algorithm is shown below.  There are two distributions present.  One distribution is centered around 1.5 PEs and the second distribution is at 8 PEs when two gaussians and a Landau distribution are combined and fit to the spectrum.  As we will show below, the first peak is due to the misidentification of a negative pion as an electron.
 
−
 
 
−
;PE Fit equation
 
−
;<math>N_{pe}= p_0 e^{-0.5 \left (\frac{x-p_1}{p_2} \right )^2} + p4\frac{1}{1-\left(\frac{x-p5}{p6}\right )} + p_6 e^{-0.5 \left (\frac{x-p_7}{p_8} \right )^2}</math>
 
−
 
 
−
[[Image:gaussian_fitting_function.pdf]]
 
−
 
 
−
<math>F(z)=\sqrt {2\pi} \frac{(z-\frac{1}{2})!}{z!}[\frac{1}{2}{c_0}^'+{c_1}^'\frac{z}{z+1}+{{c_2}^'}\frac{z(z-1)}{(z+1)(z+2)}+...]</math><br>
 
−
<math>{c_k}^'=\frac{\sqrt{2}}{\pi} {\sum}_{\alpha=0}^k c_{2\alpha}^{2k} F(\alpha)</math><br>
 
−
<math>F(\alpha)=(\alpha-\frac{1}{2})!(\alpha+\frac{1}{2})^{-(\alpha+\frac{1}{2})} e^{\alpha+\frac{1}{2}}</math><br>
 
−
<math>z!=\sqrt{2\pi}(z+\frac{1}{2})^{z+\frac{1}{2}}e^{-(z+\frac{1}{2})}[\frac{1}{2}c_0^'+c_1^1\frac{z}{z+1}+...]</math><br>
 
−
 
 
−
C.Lanczos, SIAM Journal of Numerical Analysis B1 (1964), 86.
 
−
[[Image:C.Lanczos_SIAM_Journal_of_Numerical_Analysis_B1_1964_86.pdf]]
 
−
 
 
−
//__[http://lcgapp.cern.ch/project/cls/work-packages/mathlibs/mathTable.html] [http://root.cern.ch/root/html/src/TMath.cxx.html#fsokrB] ____________________________________________________________________________
 
−
Double_t TMath::Landau(Double_t x, Double_t mpv, Double_t sigma, Bool_t norm)
 
−
{
 
−
  // The LANDAU function with mpv(most probable value) and sigma.
 
−
  // This function has been adapted from the CERNLIB routine G110 denlan.
 
−
  // If norm=kTRUE (default is kFALSE) the result is divided by sigma
 
−
  static Double_t p1[5] = {0.4259894875,-0.1249762550, 0.03984243700, -0.006298287635,  0.001511162253};
 
−
  static Double_t q1[5] = {1.0        ,-0.3388260629, 0.09594393323, -0.01608042283,    0.003778942063};
 
−
  static Double_t p2[5] = {0.1788541609, 0.1173957403, 0.01488850518, -0.001394989411,  0.0001283617211};
 
−
  static Double_t q2[5] = {1.0        , 0.7428795082, 0.3153932961,  0.06694219548,    0.008790609714};
 
−
  static Double_t p3[5] = {0.1788544503, 0.09359161662,0.006325387654, 0.00006611667319,-0.000002031049101};
 
−
  static Double_t q3[5] = {1.0        , 0.6097809921, 0.2560616665,  0.04746722384,    0.006957301675};
 
−
  static Double_t p4[5] = {0.9874054407, 118.6723273,  849.2794360,  -743.7792444,      427.0262186};
 
−
  static Double_t q4[5] = {1.0        , 106.8615961,  337.6496214,    2016.712389,      1597.063511};
 
−
  static Double_t p5[5] = {1.003675074,  167.5702434,  4789.711289,    21217.86767,    -22324.94910};
 
−
  static Double_t q5[5] = {1.0        , 156.9424537,  3745.310488,    9834.698876,      66924.28357};
 
−
  static Double_t p6[5] = {1.000827619,  664.9143136,  62972.92665,    475554.6998,    -5743609.109};
 
−
  static Double_t q6[5] = {1.0        , 651.4101098,  56974.73333,    165917.4725,    -2815759.939};
 
−
  static Double_t a1[3] = {0.04166666667,-0.01996527778, 0.02709538966};
 
−
  static Double_t a2[2] = {-1.845568670,-4.284640743};
 
−
  if (sigma <= 0) return 0;
 
−
  Double_t v = (x-mpv)/sigma;
 
−
  Double_t u, ue, us, den;
 
−
  if (v < -5.5) {
 
−
      u  = TMath::Exp(v+1.0);
 
−
      if (u < 1e-10) return 0.0;
 
−
      ue  = TMath::Exp(-1/u);
 
−
      us  = TMath::Sqrt(u);
 
−
      den = 0.3989422803*(ue/us)*(1+(a1[0]+(a1[1]+a1[2]*u)*u)*u);
 
−
  } else if(v < -1) {
 
−
      u  = TMath::Exp(-v-1);
 
−
      den = TMath::Exp(-u)*TMath::Sqrt(u)*
 
−
            (p1[0]+(p1[1]+(p1[2]+(p1[3]+p1[4]*v)*v)*v)*v)/
 
−
            (q1[0]+(q1[1]+(q1[2]+(q1[3]+q1[4]*v)*v)*v)*v);
 
−
  } else if(v < 1) {
 
−
      den = (p2[0]+(p2[1]+(p2[2]+(p2[3]+p2[4]*v)*v)*v)*v)/
 
−
            (q2[0]+(q2[1]+(q2[2]+(q2[3]+q2[4]*v)*v)*v)*v);
 
−
  } else if(v < 5) {
 
−
      den = (p3[0]+(p3[1]+(p3[2]+(p3[3]+p3[4]*v)*v)*v)*v)/
 
−
            (q3[0]+(q3[1]+(q3[2]+(q3[3]+q3[4]*v)*v)*v)*v);
 
−
  } else if(v < 12) {
 
−
      u  = 1/v;
 
−
      den = u*u*(p4[0]+(p4[1]+(p4[2]+(p4[3]+p4[4]*u)*u)*u)*u)/
 
−
                (q4[0]+(q4[1]+(q4[2]+(q4[3]+q4[4]*u)*u)*u)*u);
 
−
  } else if(v < 50) {
 
−
      u  = 1/v;
 
−
      den = u*u*(p5[0]+(p5[1]+(p5[2]+(p5[3]+p5[4]*u)*u)*u)*u)/
 
−
                (q5[0]+(q5[1]+(q5[2]+(q5[3]+q5[4]*u)*u)*u)*u);
 
−
  } else if(v < 300) {
 
−
      u  = 1/v;
 
−
      den = u*u*(p6[0]+(p6[1]+(p6[2]+(p6[3]+p6[4]*u)*u)*u)*u)/
 
−
                (q6[0]+(q6[1]+(q6[2]+(q6[3]+q6[4]*u)*u)*u)*u);
 
−
  } else {
 
−
      u  = 1/(v-v*TMath::Log(v)/(v+1));
 
−
      den = u*u*(1+(a2[0]+a2[1]*u)*u);
 
−
  }
 
−
  if (!norm) return den;
 
−
  return den/sigma;
 
−
}<br>
 
−
 
 
−
Fitting the Histograms<br>
 
−
 
 
−
root [13] e_numb_of_photoelectrons->Draw();  <br>
 
−
root [2] g3= new TF1("g3","gaus(0)+landau(3)+gaus(6)",0,20); <br>
 
−
 
 
−
To get fit parameters for g3 we should fit individually each of them(gaus(0),landau(3),gaus(6))<br>
 
−
 
 
−
root [3] g3->SetParameters(2.3e3,8,8.1,8.6e+3,8.6e-1,1.6,8.6e+3,8.6e-1,1.6,8.6e3)<br>
 
−
root [11] e_numb_of_photoelectrons->Fit("g3","R+");
 
−
 
 
−
;e_Momentum_vs_Number_of_Photoelectrons
 
−
 
 
−
The flag cut applied on the number of photoelectrons means that in CLAS detector instead of 5 superlayers were used 6 of them in track fit. As one can see from the histograms of the Number of photoelectrons, the cut on flag does not have effect on the peak around 1.5phe and decreases the number of entries by 37.17 %. The peak is due to a high energy pions(>2.5GeV), which have enough momentum to emit Cherenkov light and also because of the bad collection of light, there are a particular polar and azimuthal combination of angles where The Cherencov Detector cannot receive emitted light. .<br>
 
−
 
 
−
;Number of photoelectrons
 
−
 
 
−
 
 
−
{|border="2" colspan = "4"
 
−
!Data||||||
 
−
|-
 
−
| ||[[Image:e_number_of_photoelectrons_27095_1.gif|200px]]
 
−
|| [[Image:e_number_of_photoelectrons_27095_fits.gif|200px]]
 
−
|-
 
−
| ||[[Image:e_number_of_photoelectrons_27095_flag_10_1.gif|200px]]
 
−
|| [[Image:e_number_of_photoelectrons_27095_flag_10_fit_with_cut.gif|200px]]
 
−
|}<br>
 
−
 
 
−
Table: Cherenkov fit values
 
−
 
 
−
{|border="2" colspan = "4"
 
−
!Distributions||amplitude|| mean || width ||amplitude|| mean || width
 
−
|-
 
−
| || colspan="3" align="center"| without cuts|| colspan="3" align="center"| with cut(flag>10)
 
−
|-
 
−
| gauss(0)|| p0=2144+/-44.0 || p1=5.342+/-0.343 || p2=7.761+/-0.188 || p0=1580+/-8.1 || p1=3.75+/-0.06 || p2=8.486+/-0.042
 
−
|-
 
−
| landau(3)|| p3=4.349e+04+/-2894 ||  p4=1.049+/-0.026 || p5=0.2197+/-0.0257 || p3=8600+/-3648.7 || p4=-3.861+/-1.414 || p5=-4.88+/-1.41
 
−
|-
 
−
| gauss(6)|| p6=4960+/-270.6 || p7=0.7345+/-0.0983 || p8=0.8885+/-0.0594 || p6=6219+/-54.2 || p7=1.088+/-0.006 || p8=0.6037+/-0.0052
 
−
|}<br>
 
−
 
 
−
 
 
−
When flag cut(flag>10 cut means that 6 superlayers were used in track fit) was applied the number of entries decreased by 37.17 % and the mean value for the number of photoelectrons  is about 7-8. After 5<nphe<15 cut, the number of entries decreased by 66.63 %.The mean value of the nphe is ~9 which agrees with theory(mean value ~13).<br>
 
−
 
 
−
 
 
−
{|border="2" colspan = "4"
 
−
!Experiment||B>0||without cuts||flag>10||5<nphe<15||5<nphe<15 and flag>10
 
−
|-
 
−
| || ||[[Image:e_momentum_vs_numb_of_photoelectrons_27095_exp_without_cuts_1.gif|200px]]
 
−
[[Image:e_momentum_vs_numb_of_photoelectrons_27095_exp_without_cuts_2.gif|200px]]
 
−
[[Image:e_momentum_vs_numb_of_photoelectrons_27095_exp_without_cuts_3.gif|200px]]
 
−
|| [[Image:e_momentum_vs_numb_of_photoelectrons_27095_exp_with_cuts_flag_10_1.gif|200px]]
 
−
[[Image:e_momentum_vs_numb_of_photoelectrons_27095_exp_with_cuts_flag_10_2.gif|200px]]
 
−
[[Image:e_momentum_vs_numb_of_photoelectrons_27095_exp_with_cuts_flag_10_3.gif|200px]]
 
−
|| [[Image:e_momentum_vs_numb_of_photoelectrons_27095_exp_with_cuts_?_nphe_?.gif|200px]]
 
−
||[[Image:e_momentum_vs_numb_of_photoelectrons_27095_exp_with_cuts_5_nphe_15_flag_10.gif|200px]]
 
−
|}
 
−
 
 
−
====Pions(<math>\pi^-</math>)====
 
−
 
 
−
;<math>\pi^-</math>_Momentum_vs_Number_of_Photons
 
−
 
 
−
After e_flag>10 cut, the number of entries decreased by 30.45 % and the mean value for the number of photons is ~9
 
−
 
 
−
 
 
−
{|border="2" colspan = "4"
 
−
!Experiment||B>0||without cuts||e_flag>10||0<e_nphe<5||0<nphe<5 and e_flag>10
 
−
|-
 
−
| || ||[[Image:pi_momentum_vs_numb_of_photoelectrons_27095_exp_without_cuts_1_1.gif|200px]]
 
−
[[Image:pi_momentum_vs_numb_of_photoelectrons_27095_exp_without_cuts_2_1.gif|200px]]
 
−
[[Image:pi_momentum_vs_numb_of_photoelectrons_27095_exp_without_cuts_3_1.gif|200px]]
 
−
|| [[Image:pi_momentum_vs_numb_of_photoelectrons_27095_exp_with_cuts_flag_10_1_1.gif|200px]]
 
−
[[Image:pi_momentum_vs_numb_of_photoelectrons_27095_exp_with_cuts_flag_10_2_1.gif|200px]]
 
−
[[Image:pi_momentum_vs_numb_of_photoelectrons_27095_exp_with_cuts_flag_10_3_1.gif|200px]]
 
−
|| [[Image:pi_momentum_vs_numb_of_photoelectrons_27095_exp_with_cuts_?_nphe_?.gif|200px]]
 
−
||[[Image:pi_momentum_vs_numb_of_photoelectrons_27095_exp_with_cuts_0_nphe_5_flag_10.gif|200px]]
 
−
|}
 
−
 
 
−
== Calorimeter==
 
−
 
 
−
== Electron-pion contamination==
 
−
Osipenko's CLAS Note 2004-20 [[Image:CLAS_Note-2004-020.pdf]]
 
−
 
 
−
;EC_tot/P_vs_Number_of_Photoelectrons and EC_inner/P_vs_Number_of_Photoelectrons
 
−
 
 
−
Two types of cuts were applied on the distributions below, one on the energy deposited to the inner calorimeter <math>EC_{inner}/P>0.08</math> and another one on the total energy absorbed by the calorimeter <math>EC_{tot}/P>0.2</math>, to improve the electron particle identification. In this case was used dst27095_05 file, the beam energy is 5.735 GeV and target NH3.<br>
 
−
 
 
−
{|border="2" colspan = "4"
 
−
! without cut || <math>EC_{tot}/P</math>_vs_nphe(<math>EC_{tot}/P>0.2</math>)|| <math>EC_{inner}/P</math>_vs_nphe (<math>EC_{inner}/P>0.08</math>)|| <math>EC_{tot}/P</math>_vs_nphe(<math>EC_{inner}/P>0.08</math>)
 
−
|-
 
−
|[[Image:ec_tot_momentum_vs_numb_of_phe_27095_without_cut.gif|200px]]
 
−
|| [[Image:ec_tot_momentum_vs_numb_of_phe_27095_with_cut.gif|200px]]
 
−
|| [[Image:ec_inner_momentum_vs_numb_of_phe_27095_with_cut_ec_inner_momentum_0.08.gif|200px]]
 
−
|| [[Image:ec_tot_momentum_vs_numb_of_phe_27095_with_cut_ec_inner_momentum_0.08.gif|200px]]
 
−
|}<br>
 
−
 
 
−
{|border="2" colspan = "4"
 
−
! <math>EC_{inner}/P</math>_vs_nphe(<math>EC_{tot}/P>0.2</math>) || <math>EC_{tot}/P</math>_vs_nphe(<math>EC_{tot}/P>0.2</math> and <math>EC_{inner}/P>0.08</math>)|| <math>EC_{inner}/P</math>_vs_nphe (<math>EC_{tot}/P>0.2</math> and <math>EC_{inner}/P>0.08</math>)
 
−
|-
 
−
|| [[Image:ec_inner_momentum_vs_numb_of_phe_27095_with_cut_ec_tot_momentum_0.2.gif|200px]]
 
−
|| [[Image:ec_tot_momentum_vs_numb_of_phe_27095_with_cut_ec_inner_momentum_0.08_and_ec_tot_momentum_0.2.gif|200px]]
 
−
|| [[Image:ec_inner_momentum_vs_numb_of_phe_27095_with_cut_ec_tot_momentum_0.2_and_ec_inner_momentum0.08.gif|200px]]
 
−
|}<br>
 
−
 
 
−
 
 
−
From the EC_tot/P_vs_Number_of_Photoelectrons histogram one can see that the released energy fraction(<math>EC_{tot}/P</math>) at ~1.5 nphe peak is much smaller than it should be for electrons. In conclusion, the ~1.5 nphe peak is produced by the tail of negatively charged particles(pions). To eliminate negatively charged pions  <math>EC_{tot}/P>0.2</math> cut is applied on Calorimeter. After the cut was applied the number of entries decreased by ~33.47%.<br>
 
−
 
 
−
 
 
−
Insert example of pion-electron contamination estimate.  Use the fits from the cherenkov spectrum to estimate<br>
 
−
how many pions are stil in the electron sample after the E/P cut.<br>
 
−
 
 
−
Pion contamination in the electron sample (without cuts) =<br>
 
−
<math> = \frac {Integral(gauss(0))}{Integral(gauss(0) + landau(3) + gauss(6))} =</math><br>
 
−
<math> = \frac{1.763 \times 10^5}{ 1.763 \times 10^5 + 2.318 \times 10^5 + 4.559 \times 10^5} = </math> <br>
 
−
<math> = 0.204050926 </math><br>
 
−
 
 
−
[[Image:gauss(0)_landau(3)_gauss(6)_all_three_histograms_overlapped.gif|250px]]
 
−
 
 
−
 
 
−
{|border="2" colspan = "4"
 
−
!  || with cut(<math>EC_{tot}/P>0.2</math>)||with cut(<math>EC_{inner}/P>0.08</math>)||with cuts(<math>EC_{inner}/P>0.08</math> and <math>EC_{tot}/P>0.2</math>)
 
−
|-
 
−
| || [[Image:e_numb_of_photoelectrons_with_cuts_27095_ec_tot_p_0.2.gif|200px]]
 
−
|| [[Image:e_numb_of_photoelectrons_with_cuts_27095_ec_inner_p_0.08.gif|200px]]
 
−
|| [[Image:e_numb_of_photoelectrons_with_cuts_27095_ec_inner_p_0.08_and_ec_tot_p_0.2.gif|200px]]
 
−
|}
 
−
 
 
−
{|border="2" colspan = "4"
 
−
!Distributions||amplitude|| mean || width ||amplitude|| mean || width||amplitude|| mean || width
 
−
|-
 
−
| || colspan="3" align="center"|  with cut(<math>EC_{tot}/P>0.2</math>) || colspan="3" align="center"| with cut(<math>EC_{inner}/P>0.08</math>) || colspan="3" align="center" | with cuts(<math>EC_{inner}/P>0.08</math> and <math>EC_{tot}/P>0.2</math>)
 
−
|-
 
−
| gauss(0)|| p0=1919+/-17.8 || p1=3.593+/-0.233 || p2=8.269+/-0.134 || p0=2025+/-9.4 || p1=3.44+/-0.05 || p2=8.442+/-0.037  || p0=1732+/-8.4 || p1=3.886+/-0.050 || p2=8.069+/-0.037
 
−
|-
 
−
| landau(3)|| p3=8600+/-1.4 ||  p4=-3.063+/-1.414 || p5=-7.138+/-0.000 || p3=8600+/-3648.7 || p4=-3.092+/-1.414 || p5=-10.91+/-0.000 || p3=8600+/-5160.0 || p4=-2.821+/-1.414 || p5=-7.986+/-1.414
 
−
|-
 
−
| gauss(6)|| p6=5568+/-69.1 || p7=1.164+/-0.006 || p8=0.543+/-0.008 || p6=5773+/-76.6 || p7=1.162+/-0.008 || p8=0.5562+/-0.0052 || p6=4301+/51.3 || p7=1.189+/-0.008 || p8=0.5299+/-0.0059
 
−
|}<br>
 
−
[[Image:e_numb_of_photoelectrons_ec_inner_0.08_ec_total_0.2_e_momentum_3GeV.gif|200px]]
 
−
 
 
−
e_numb_of_photoelectrons with the following cuts <math>EC_{inner}/P>0.08</math>, <math>EC_{tot}/P>0.2</math>. To eliminate the photons produced by the negatively charged pions was used the cut on the momentum e_momentum<3 GeV. Because the high energy pions are able to produce photons, which are misidentified with photoelectrons.
 
−
 
 
−
 
 
−
[[Image:electrons_nphe_with_cuts_ecinner_0.08p_ectotal_0.2p_emomentum_3_nphe_2.5_file_dst27095_with_gauss_fit.gif|200px]]
 
−
[[Image:electrons_nphe_with_cuts_ecinner_0.08p_ectotal_0.2p_emomentum_3_nphe_2.5_file_dst27095_with_gauss_landau_fit.gif|200px]]
 
−
[[Image:electrons_nphe_with_cuts_ecinner_0.06p_ectotal_0.24p_emomentum_3_nphe_0.5_file_dst27095_with_gauss_fit.gif|200px]]
 
−
[[Image:electrons_nphe_with_cuts_ecinner_0.06p_ectotal_0.24p_emomentum_3_nphe_0.5_file_dst27095_with_gauss_landau_fit.gif|200px]]
 
−
 
 
−
==Electron==
 
−
 
 
−
=== Cuts ===
 
−
 
 
−
==== Calorimeter based cuts====
 
−
The distributions below represent two types of cuts applied to improve the electron particle identification (PID) using a 4 GeV electron beam incident on an NH3 target.  The electron calorimeter is segmented into an inner<math>EC_{inner}</math> and an outer<math>EC_{outer}</math> region.  The total energy absorbed by the calorimeter system is recorded in the variable <math>EC_{tot}</math>.  The momentum (<math>P</math>) is calculated using the reconstructed track and the known torus magnetic field.  The distributions of <math>EC_{tot}</math> and <math>EC_{inner}</math> are shown below where both have been divided by the electron momentum and no cuts have been applied.
 
−
 
 
−
 
 
−
 
 
−
=====<math>EC_{tot}>0.2*p</math>=====
 
−
 
 
−
 
 
−
Without any cuts we have 181018 entries. After using the following cut <math>EC_{tot}>0.2*p</math> we are getting 127719 entries, which is about 70.55% of 181018. <br>
 
−
 
 
−
[[Image:Etotal_P_using_tot_cut.gif | 200 px]]
 
−
[[Image:Einner_P_using_tot_cut.gif | 200 px]]<br>
 
−
 
 
−
=====<math>EC_{inner}>0.08*p</math>=====
 
−
 
 
−
 
 
−
After the cut on the energy deposited into inner part of electron calorimeter, number of entries decreases by 22%.<br>
 
−
 
 
−
[[Image:Etotal_P_using_inner_cut.gif | 200 px]] [[Image:Einner_P_using_inner_cut.gif | 200 px]]<br>
 
−
 
 
−
=====Both cuts <math>  EC_{tot}>0.2*p </math> and <math> EC_{inner}>0.08*p  </math>=====
 
−
 
 
−
In case of using the cuts of the total deposited energy and the energy deposited into inner calorimeter number of entries decreases ~36% <br>
 
−
 
 
−
[[Image:Etotal_P_using_both_cuts.gif | 200 px]]
 
−
[[Image:Einner_P_using_both_cuts.gif | 200 px]]<br>
 
−
 
 
−
====summary table====
 
−
 
 
−
The "# of triggers" columns represents the number of events which generated a signal above threshold in the calorimeter and the scintillator.  The expected # of events column represents the number of reconstructed events with tracks that also make it through the cuts defined in the table.
 
−
 
 
−
The semi-inclusive analysis will focus on the 4 GeV and 6 GeV data which have both inbending and outbending torus settings.  Specifically runs 28074 - 28579 ( 4 GeV) and Runs 27356 - 27499 and 26874 - 27198 (6 GeV)
 
−
 
 
−
 
 
−
{|border="2" colspan = "20"
 
−
!Beam Energy||Torus Current||Begin Run||End Run ||file used || cuts || || || # trig(<math>10^6</math>) || expected # evts(<math>10^6</math>)||p<3,<math>EC_{tot}>0.2*p </math>,<math> EC_{inner}>0.08*p</math>(%)||p>3,<math>EC_{tot}>0.24*p </math>,<math> EC_{inner}>0.06*p</math>(%)
 
−
|-
 
−
| || || || || || <math>EC_{tot}>0.2*p</math> || <math>EC_{inner}>0.08*p</math>|| <math>EC_{tot}>0.2*p </math> and <math> EC_{inner}>0.08*p</math>|| || || ||
 
−
|-
 
−
|1606||1500||25488||25559||dst25504_02.B00||64%||49.5%||78%||60||3.2
 
−
|-
 
−
|1606||1946||25560||25605|| || ||44
 
−
|-
 
−
|1606||1500||25669||25732||dst25669_02.B00||64%||49%||78%||226||10
 
−
|-
 
−
|1606||1500||25742||26221||dst25754_02.B00||21%||11%||24%||3154||13.3
 
−
|-
 
−
|1606||-1500||26222||26359||dst26224_02.B00||4.6%||3%||6.6%||703||13.1
 
−
|-
 
−
|1724||-1500||27644||27798||dst27649_02.B00||4.8%||2.2%||5.9%||211||20
 
−
|-
 
−
|1724||1500||28512||28526|| || ||159
 
−
|-
 
−
|1724||-1500||28527||28532|| || ||93
 
−
|-
 
−
|2288||1500||27205||27351||dst27225_02.B00||20.2%||13%||25.6%||1647||16.1
 
−
|-
 
−
|2562||-1500||27799||27924||dst27809_02.B00||5.7%||4.6%||8.6%||1441||13.1
 
−
|-
 
−
|2562||-1500||27942||27995||dst27942_02.B00||6.1%||4.4%||8.9%||841||32.3
 
−
|-
 
−
|2562||1500||28001||28069||dst28002_02.B00||27.8%||13%||29.6%||1013||30.7
 
−
|-
 
−
|2792||-1500||27936||27941||dst27937_02.B00||6.7%||5%||9.9%||69||20.6
 
−
|-
 
−
|3210||-2250||28549||28570|| || ||436
 
−
|-
 
−
|4239||2250||28074||28277||dst28075_02.B00||35.3%||23.9%||40.5%||2278||19.6
 
−
|-
 
−
|4239||-2250||28280||28479||dst28281_02.B00||9.1%||9.4%||13.6%||2620||15.2
 
−
|-
 
−
|4239||2250||28482||28494|| || ||7
 
−
|-
 
−
|4239||-2250||28500||28505|| || ||107
 
−
|-
 
−
|4239||2250||28506||28510||dst28509_02.B00||29.5%||22%||36%||75||18.1
 
−
|-
 
−
|5627||2250||27356||27364||dst27358_02.B00||33.2%||27.8%||41.3%||56||19.4||44.6||40.1
 
−
|-
 
−
|5627||-2250||27366||27380||dst27368_02.B00||12.6%||14.8%||19.5%||130||13.6||25.3||8.8
 
−
|-
 
−
|5627||2250||27386||27499||dst27388_02.B00||33.4%||27.8%||41.4%||1210||20.2||44.8||40.1
 
−
|-
 
−
|5627||965||27502||27617|| || ||493
 
−
|-
 
−
|5735||-2250||26874||27068||dst26904_02.B00||13%||15%||20%||1709||19.9||25.6||9.1
 
−
|-
 
−
|5735||2250||27069||27198||dst27070_02.B00||33.3%||28.8%||42.2%||1509||15||46||40.2
 
−
|-
 
−
|5764||-2250||26468||26722||dst26489_02.B00||12.2%||14.4%||19.1%||1189||10||24.6||9.3
 
−
|-
 
−
|5764||0||26723||26775|| || ||268
 
−
|-
 
−
|5764||-2250||26776||26851||dst26779_02.B00||13.5%||15.5%||20.5%||662||15.9||26.4||9.2
 
−
|}
 
−
 
 
−
====Cut on the number of photoelectrons====
 
−
 
 
−
 
 
−
In this case is used a cut on the number of photoelectrons, which is <math>nphe>2.5</math>. The plots below show the 
 
−
effect of the number of photoelectrons cuts on the Cerenkov distribution. We see that after using cut the number of entries decreases ~40.7%
 
−
<br>
 
−
 
−
[[Image:nphe_before_cut_file_27070.gif|200px]]  [[Image:nphe1_after_cut_file_27070.gif|200px]]<br>
 
−
 
 
−
 
 
−
Used cuts <math>EC_{tot}>0.24p</math> and <math>EC_{inner}>0.06p</math><br>
 
−
 
 
−
 
 
−
[[Image:nphe_before_electron_cuts_file_27070.gif|200px]]  [[Image:nphe1_after_electron_cuts_file_27070.gif|200px]]<br>
 
−
 
 
−
 
 
−
 
 
−
Used file dst28181_03(energy 4.2GeV). In this case was applied cuts on the polar angle(<math>15<\theta<20</math>) and momentum(<math>2.2<P<2.6</math>). Number of entries decreased by 96%(?????????????/)<br>
 
−
 
 
−
 
 
−
[[Image:nphe_before_cuts_file_28181.gif|200px]]  [[Image:nphe1_after_cuts_file_28181.gif|200px]]<br>
 
−
 
 
−
[http://www.jlab.org/Hall-B/secure/eg1/EG2000/nevzat/UPGRADE_DST/ OSIPENKO cuts ]
 
−
 
 
−
====Plot of <math>EC_{tot}/p</math> vs <math>EC_{inner}/p</math>====
 
−
 
 
−
In this case is used file dst27070(Energy 5.735 GeV and Torus 2250) and are applied the following EC cuts: For ECtotal - <math>EC_{tot}>0.2p</math>, for EC inner - <math>EC_{inner}>0.08p</math>.<br>
 
−
 
 
−
=====P<3=====
 
−
 
 
−
After using above cuts the number of entries decreases ~46%<br>
 
−
 
 
−
[[Image:e_total_vs_e_inner1_before_cuts_file_dst27070.gif|200px]]
 
−
[[Image:e_total_vs_e_inner1_after_cuts_file_dst27070.gif|200px]]<br>
 
−
 
 
−
=====0.5<P<1=====
 
−
The number of entries decreased by ~51.8%<br>
 
−
 
 
−
[[Image:e_total_vs_e_inner1_before_cuts_P1_file_dst27070.gif|200px]]
 
−
[[Image:e_total_vs_e_inner1_after_cuts_P1_file_dst27070.gif|200px]]<br>
 
−
 
 
−
=====1<P<1.5=====
 
−
 
 
−
The number of entries decreased approximately by 47.8%<br>
 
−
 
−
[[Image:e_total_vs_e_inner1_before_cuts_P1.5_file_dst27070.gif|200px]]
 
−
[[Image:e_total_vs_e_inner1_after_cuts_P1.5_file_dst27070.gif|200px]]<br>
 
−
 
 
−
=====1.5<P<2=====
 
−
 
 
−
In this case the number of entries decreased by 46.1%<br>
 
−
 
 
−
[[Image:e_total_vs_e_inner1_before_cuts_P2_file_dst27070.gif|200px]]
 
−
[[Image:e_total_vs_e_inner1_after_cuts_P2_file_dst27070.gif|200px]]<br>
 
−
 
 
−
=====2<P<2.5=====
 
−
 
 
−
In this case the number of entries decreased by 38%<br>
 
−
 
 
−
[[Image:e_total_vs_e_inner1_before_cuts_P2.5_file_dst27070.gif|200px]]
 
−
[[Image:e_total_vs_e_inner1_after_cuts_P2.5_file_dst27070.gif|200px]]<br>
 
−
 
 
−
=====P>3=====
 
−
 
 
−
Used file dst27070(Energy 5.735 GeV and Torus 2250) and are applied the following EC cuts: For ECtotal - <math>EC_{tot}>0.24p</math>, for EC inner - <math>EC_{inner}>0.06p</math>.<br>
 
−
 
 
−
The number of entries decreased by~40.2%<br>
 
−
 
 
−
[[Image:e_total_vs_e_inner1_before_cuts_P3_file_dst27070.gif|200px]]
 
−
[[Image:e_total_vs_e_inner1_after_cuts_P3_file_dst27070.gif|200px]]<br>
 
−
 
 
−
====Plot of EC_tot/P vs nphe for Electrons====
 
−
Used file dst27070(Energy 5.735 GeV and Torus 2250)<br>
 
−
=====p<3 GeV=====
 
−
The graphs below represents all electron candidates having a momentum smaller than 3 GeV.  Negatively charged pions are the most likely particle to be misidentified as an electrons by the tracking software.  A negatively charged pion having a momentum of 3 GeV would generate less than ?? photons in the cerenkov counter.  As a result the electron candidates which <math>n_{pe} < 1.xx </math> are thought to be misidentified pions.  The images which follow represent the effects of several cuts made for the purpose of removing misidentified particles.<br>
 
−
 
 
−
[[Image:e_total_vs_nphe_momentum_cut_file_dst27070.gif|200px]]<br>
 
−
 
 
−
 
 
−
;chi_sqr for pions
 
−
 
 
−
[[Image:chi_sqr_27095_pions.gif|200px]]
 
−
 
 
−
;<math>\pi</math>_Momentum_vs_Number_of_Photons for pions(<math>\pi</math>)<br>
 
−
 
 
−
Used file:27095_05.B00(energy=5.735GeV  and torus=2250), everything is done for <math>\pi^-</math><br>
 
−
 
 
−
 
 
−
 
 
−
 
 
−
 
 
−
=====p<3 GeV and <math>EC_{inner}>0.08p</math>=====
 
−
 
 
−
[[Image:e_total_P_vs_nphe_momentum_Ec_inner_cuts_file_dst27070.gif|200px]]<br>
 
−
 
 
−
=====p<3 GeV, <math>EC_{inner}>0.08p</math> and <math>EC_{tot}>0.2p</math>=====
 
−
 
 
−
[[Image:e_total_P_vs_nphe_momentum_EC_inner_EC_total_cuts_file_dst27070.gif|200px]]<br>
 
−
 
 
−
=====p<3 GeV, <math>EC_{inner}>0.08p</math>, <math>EC_{tot}>0.2p</math> and nphe>2.5=====
 
−
 
 
−
[[Image:e_total_P_vs_nphe_momentum_EC_inner_EC_total_nphe_cuts_file_dst27070.gif|200px]]<br>
 
−
 
 
−
====Plot of EC_total vs EC_inner====
 
−
 
 
−
In this case file dst28181_03.B00 was used(Energy 4.2 GeV and Torus +2250).
 
−
[http://www.jlab.org/Hall-B/secure/eg1/EG2000/sharon/ec_cut_4p2gev/Final_ec_cuts/Electron_cuts.html The following cuts] were applied:<math>EC_{inner}>0.005</math>, <math>EC_{tot}>0.2*p</math>, ec_chi_sqr<0.1 and nphe>3.<br>
 
−
 
 
−
[[Image:Etotal_vs_Einner_file_dst28181_03_before_cuts.gif|200px]]
 
−
[[Image:Etotal_vs_Einner_file_dst28181_03_after_cuts.gif|200px]]<br>
 
−
 
 
−
====Raster and vertex correction====
 
−
 
 
−
 
 
−
A raster calibration and a cut on the vertex distribution was made in order to select electrons from the polarized target, also the ones scattered from other materials in the beam path. A plot of the uncorrected vertex distribution is presented below for dst27070_02.B00 file(energy=5.7GeV  Torus=2250)<br>
 
−
 
 
−
[[Image:vertex_before_corrections_dst27070_file.gif|200px]]
 
−
 
 
−
==Pion==
 
−
 
 
−
===Summary Table===
 
−
 
 
−
[http://www.jlab.org/Hall-B/secure/eg1/EG2000/josh/pion.cc Josh's Pion cuts code]
 
−
 
 
−
{|border="2" colspan = "20"
 
−
!Beam Energy||Torus Current||Begin Run||End Run ||file used || # trig(<math>10^6</math>) || expected # evts(<math>10^6</math>)||p>3,<math>EC_{tot}<0.2*p </math>,<math> EC_{inner}<0.08*p</math>(%)||p<3,<math>EC_{tot}<0.24*p </math>,<math> EC_{inner}<0.06*p</math>(%)
 
−
|-
 
−
| || || || || || || || ||
 
−
|-
 
−
|1606||1500||25488||25559||dst25504_02.B00||60||3.2
 
−
|-
 
−
|1606||1500||25669||25732||dst25669_02.B00||226||10
 
−
|-
 
−
|1606||1500||25742||26221||dst25754_02.B00||3154||13.3
 
−
|-
 
−
|1606||-1500||26222||26359||dst26224_02.B00||703||13.1
 
−
|-
 
−
|1724||-1500||27644||27798||dst27649_02.B00||211||20
 
−
|-
 
−
|2288||1500||27205||27351||dst27225_02.B00||1647||16.1
 
−
|-
 
−
|2562||-1500||27799||27924||dst27809_02.B00||1441||13.1
 
−
|-
 
−
|2562||-1500||27942||27995||dst27942_02.B00||841||32.3
 
−
|-
 
−
|2562||1500||28001||28069||dst28002_02.B00||1013||30.7
 
−
|-
 
−
|2792||-1500||27936||27941||dst27937_02.B00||69||20.6
 
−
|-
 
−
|4239||2250||28074||28277||dst28075_02.B00||2278||19.6
 
−
|-
 
−
|4239||-2250||28280||28479||dst28281_02.B00||2620||15.2
 
−
|-
 
−
|4239||2250||28506||28510||dst28509_02.B00||75||18.1
 
−
|-
 
−
|5627||2250||27356||27364||dst27358_02.B00||56||19.4||36.1||31.5
 
−
|-
 
−
|5627||-2250||27366||27380||dst27368_02.B00||130||13.6||25||43.8 
 
−
|-
 
−
|5627||2250||27386||27499||dst27388_02.B00||1210||20.2||39.8||32.4 
 
−
|-
 
−
|5735||-2250||26874||27068||dst26904_02.B00||1709||19.9||22.5||46.4 
 
−
|-
 
−
|5735||2250||27069||27198||dst27070_02.B00||1509||15||34.6||32.9 
 
−
|-
 
−
|5764||-2250||26468||26722||dst26489_02.B00||1189||10||25.2||44.3 
 
−
|-
 
−
|5764||-2250||26776||26851||dst26779_02.B00||662||15.9||21.3||44
 
−
|}
 
−
 
 
−
===Table for Pions===
 
−
 
−
I used the pion id code(both subroutines):
 
−
 
 
−
[http://www.jlab.org/Hall-B/secure/eg1/EG2000/josh/pion.cc Josh's Pion cuts code]
 
−
 
 
−
{|border="2" colspan = "20"
 
−
!Beam Energy||Torus Current||Begin Run||End Run ||file used || events remaining after cuts || || # trig(<math>10^6</math>) || expected # evts(<math>10^6</math>)
 
−
|-
 
−
| || || || || || first(%) || second(%)|| ||
 
−
|-
 
−
|1606||1500||25488||25559||dst25504_02.B00||96.8||99||60||3.2
 
−
|-
 
−
|1606||1500||25669||25732||dst25669_02.B00||98.1||98.9||226||10
 
−
|-
 
−
|1606||1500||25742||26221||dst25754_02.B00||13.4||22.8||3154||13.3
 
−
|-
 
−
|1606||-1500||26222||26359||dst26224_02.B00||11.3||15.3||703||13.1
 
−
|-
 
−
|1724||-1500||27644||27798||dst27649_02.B00||15.3||18.7||211||20
 
−
|-
 
−
|2288||1500||27205||27351||dst27225_02.B00||16.4||18.9||1647||16.1
 
−
|-
 
−
|2562||-1500||27799||27924||dst27809_02.B00||11.1||14.2||1441||13.1
 
−
|-
 
−
|2562||-1500||27942||27995||dst27942_02.B00||11.1||14.2||841||32.3
 
−
|-
 
−
|2562||1500||28001||28069||dst28002_02.B00||22.4||23.1||1013||30.7
 
−
|-
 
−
|2792||-1500||27936||27941||dst27937_02.B00||12.3||15.4||69||20.6
 
−
|-
 
−
|4239||2250||28074||28277||dst28075_02.B00||16.7||14.3||2278||19.6
 
−
|-
 
−
|4239||-2250||28280||28479||dst28281_02.B00||10.4||12.6||2620||15.2
 
−
|-
 
−
|4239||2250||28506||28510||dst28509_02.B00|| %|| %||75||18.1
 
−
|-
 
−
|5627||2250||27356||27364||dst27358_02.B00||40.5||40.8||56||19.4
 
−
|-
 
−
|5627||-2250||27366||27380||dst27368_02.B00||9.7||12.7||130||13.6 
 
−
|-
 
−
|5627||2250||27386||27499||dst27388_02.B00||14.1||15.5||1210||20.2
 
−
|-
 
−
|5735||-2250||26874||27068||dst26904_02.B00||12.1||14.5||1709||19.9 
 
−
|-
 
−
|5735||2250||27069||27198||dst27070_02.B00||19.5||22.9||1509||15
 
−
|-
 
−
|5764||-2250||26468||26722||dst26489_02.B00||9.6||13.3||1189||10
 
−
|-
 
−
|5764||-2250||26776||26851||dst26779_02.B00||10.3||13.9||662||15.9
 
−
|}
 
−
 
 
−
===Plot of EC_tot/P vs nphe for Pions===
 
−
 
 
−
[[Image:e_total_vs_nphe_pions_file_dst27070.gif|200px]]
 
−
[[Image:e_total_vs_nphe_electrons_file_dst27070.gif|200px]]
 
−
 
 
−
 
 
−
[[Image:pi_ec_tot_momentum_vs_nphe_file_dst27095_without_cuts.gif|200px]]
 
−
[[Image:pi_ec_tot_momentum_vs_nphe_file_dst27095_with_cuts.gif|200px]]
 
−
 
 
−
=Quality Checks=
 
−
== Run Summary Table ==
 
−
The table below uses a characteristic DST file to try and estimate the sample size for a semi-inclusive analysis of pion electroproduction.  The column marked "cuts" below indicates the number of events kept when the standard EC based electron identification cuts, described above, are used: <math>EC_{tot}>0.2*p </math> and <br><math> EC_{inner}>0.08*p</math>.  The next step will be to compare unpolarized pion production rates in order to evaluate the CLAS detectors efficiencies for measuring charged pions with different torus polarities.  The question is whether you get the same rates for negatively charged pions in one torus polarity to positively charged pions using the opposite torus polarity.
 
−
 
 
−
{|border="2" colspan = "20"
 
−
!Beam Energy||Torus Current||Target || Begin Run||End Run ||file used || # trig(<math>10^6</math>) || events remaining after <math>e^-</math> cuts(%)  || expected # evts(<math>10^6</math>)|| events remaining after <math>e^-</math> and <math>\pi^+</math> cuts(%) || expected # evts(<math>10^6</math>)|| events remaining after <math>e^-</math> and <math>\pi^-</math> cuts(%) || expected # evts(<math>10^6</math>)
 
−
|-
 
−
|4239||2250||NH3 || 28205||28277||/cache/mss/home/nguler/dst/dst28205_05.B00||1108.72||60.8||674.1||8.3||92.02||3.24||35.92
 
−
|-
 
−
|||||ND3 || 28074||28190||/cache/mss/home/nguler/dst/dst28187_05.B00||1117.87||59.6||666.25||7.99||89.32||3.3||36.9
 
−
|-
 
−
|||-2250||NH3 || 28407||28479||/cache/mss/home/nguler/dst/dst28409_05.B00||1013.57||24.2||245.28||0.12||1.22||0||0
 
−
|-
 
−
|||||ND3 || 28278||28403||/cache/mss/home/nguler/dst/dst28400_05.B00||1556.04||23.9||371.89||0.02||0.31||0.05||0.51
 
−
|-
 
−
|5735||2250|| NH3 ||27074||27195||/cache/mss/home/nguler/dst/dst27095_05.B00||1442.25||57.7||832.18||9.3||134.13||3.8||59.13
 
−
|-
 
−
||||| ND3 ||27116||27170||/cache/mss/home/nguler/dst/dst27141_05.B00||624.55||59.1||369.10||9.53||59.52||3.9||24.36
 
−
|-
 
−
|||-2250|| NH3 ||26911||27015||/cache/mss/home/nguler/dst/dst26988.B00||900.93||80.7||727.05||7.14||64.33||9.9||89.19
 
−
|-
 
−
||||| ND3 ||27022||27068||/cache/mss/home/nguler/dst/dst27055_05.B00|| 711.53||80||569.22||6.97||49.59||10.1||71.86
 
−
|-
 
−
 
 
−
|}
 
−
 
 
−
==Rates==
 
−
===Unpolarized Pion electroproduction===
 
−
==== Rates from other experiments in our Kinematic range====
 
−
===== Center of Mass Frame Transformation=====
 
−
We have proton and electron. In the Lab frame electron is moving along the x-axis with momentum ;<math>\vec{p_e}</math> and proton is at rest. The 4-vectors are:<br>
 
−
;Lab Frame: <math>P_e=</math>(<math>E_e</math>,<math>p_e</math>,0,0) and for proton :<math>P_p=</math>(<math>m_p</math>,0,0,0)<br>
 
−
;CM Frame: :<math>{P_e}^{\prime}=</math>(<math>{E_e}^{\prime}</math>,<math>{p_e}^{\prime}</math>,<math>0</math>,<math>0</math>) and for proton :<math>{P_p}^{\prime}=</math>(<math>{E_p}^{\prime}</math>,<math>{p_p}^{\prime}</math>,<math>0</math>,<math>0</math>)<br>
 
−
 
−
:Find <math> \beta_{CM} </math> such that <math>P_{tot}^{CM}=0 =p_e^{\prime} + {p_p}^{\prime}</math><br>
 
−
 
−
:<math>\left ( \begin{matrix} {E_e}^{\prime} \\ p_e^{\prime} \\ 0 \\ 0 \end{matrix} \right )= \left [ \begin{matrix} \gamma  & -\gamma \beta & 0 & 0 \\ -\gamma \beta  & \gamma &0 &0 \\ 0 &0 &1 &0 \\ 0  &0 &0 & 1 \end{matrix} \right ] \left ( \begin{matrix} E_e \\ p_e \\ 0  \\ 0 \end{matrix} \right )</math><br>
 
−
 
 
−
 
 
−
:<math>\left ( \begin{matrix} {E_p}^{\prime} \\ p_p^{\prime} \\ 0 \\ 0 \end{matrix} \right )= \left [ \begin{matrix} \gamma  & -\gamma \beta & 0 & 0 \\ -\gamma \beta & \gamma &0 &0 \\ 0 &0 &1 &0 \\ 0 &0 &0 &1\end{matrix} \right ] \left ( \begin{matrix} m_p \\ 0 \\ 0  \\ 0 \end{matrix} \right )</math><br>
 
−
 
 
−
Using the last two equations we will get the following for x component:<br>
 
−
:<math>{p_e}^{\prime}=-\gamma_{cm}(\beta_{cm} E_e-p_e)</math><br>
 
−
 
 
−
:<math>p_p^{\prime} = - \gamma_{cm} \beta_{cm} m_p</math><br>
 
−
 
 
−
:<math> \gamma_{cm}(p_e - \beta_{cm} E_e)= \gamma_{cm} \beta_{cm} m_p </math><br>
 
−
 
 
−
:<math>\beta_{cm} = \frac {p_e}{m_p + E_e}</math><br>
 
−
 
 
−
=====Example of  the Missing Mass Calculation for the following reaction  <math>e^- p^+ \rightarrow (e^-)^{\prime}  \pi^{-}  X </math> =====
 
−
 
 
−
[[Image:event_number_3143292_1.jpg|200px]]
 
−
[[Image:event_number_3143292_2.jpg|200px]]
 
−
[[Image:event_number_3143292_3.jpg|200px]]<br>
 
−
 
 
−
:<math>p_e = 5.736 Gev \sim E_e</math> : electron mass is neglibible
 
−
:<math>m_p = 0.938 GeV</math> : Mass of a proton
 
−
:<math>\beta_{cm} = \frac{5.736}{6.674} = 0.859 < 1</math><br>
 
−
:<math>\gamma_{cm} = \frac{1}{\sqrt{1 - \beta_{cm}^2}} = \frac{1}{\sqrt{1 - 0.859^2}} = 1.9532</math><br>
 
−
 
 
−
:<math>\left ( \begin{matrix} {E_e}^{\prime} \\ p_{ex}^{\prime} \\  p_{ey}^{\prime} \\  p_{ez}^{\prime} \end{matrix} \right )= \left [ \begin{matrix} \gamma_{cm}  & 0 & 0 & -\gamma_{cm} \beta_{cm} \\ 0 & 1 &0 &0 \\ 0 &0 &1 &0 \\ -\gamma_{cm} \beta_{cm} &0 &0 &\gamma_{cm}\end{matrix} \right ] \left ( \begin{matrix} E_e=4.4915 \\ -0.549 \\ 0.974  \\ 4.3501 \end{matrix} \right )</math><br>
 
−
 
 
−
:<math>\left ( \begin{matrix} {E_p}^{\prime} \\ p_{px}^{\prime} \\  p_{py}^{\prime} \\  p_{pz}^{\prime} \end{matrix} \right )= \left [ \begin{matrix} \gamma_{cm}  & 0 & 0 & -\gamma_{cm} \beta_{cm} \\ 0 & 1 &0 &0 \\ 0 &0 &1 &0 \\  -\gamma_{cm} \beta_{cm} &0 &0 & \gamma_{cm} \end{matrix} \right ] \left ( \begin{matrix} E_p = 1.4563 \\ 0.3697 \\    -0.3447  \\ 0.9924 \end{matrix} \right )</math><br>
 
−
 
 
−
:<math>\left ( \begin{matrix} {E_{\pi^-}}^{\prime} \\ p_{\pi^- x}^{\prime} \\  p_{{\pi^-} y}^{\prime} \\  p_{{\pi^-} z}^{\prime} \end{matrix} \right )= \left [ \begin{matrix} \gamma_{cm}  & 0 & 0 & -\gamma_{cm} \beta_{cm} \\ 0 & 1 &0 &0 \\ 0 &0 &1 &0 \\ -\gamma_{cm} \beta_{cm} &0 &0 & \gamma_{cm} \end{matrix} \right ] \left ( \begin{matrix} E_{\pi^-} = 0.5757 \\ 0.1052 \\ -0.4394  \\ 0.3282 \end{matrix} \right )</math><br>
 
−
 
 
−
;Electron:<math>\left ( \begin{matrix} {E_e}^{\prime} \\ p_{ex}^{\prime} \\  p_{ey}^{\prime} \\  p_{ez}^{\prime} \end{matrix} \right )=  \left ( \begin{matrix} 4.4915 \gamma_{cm} - 4.3501 \gamma_{cm} \beta_{cm} \\ -0.549 \\ 0.974  \\ -4.4915 \gamma_{cm} \beta_{cm} + 4.3501 \gamma_{cm} \end{matrix} \right ) = \left ( \begin{matrix} 1.4742 \\ -0.549 \\ 0.974  \\ 0.96078 \end{matrix} \right )</math><br>
 
−
 
 
−
;Proton:<math>\left ( \begin{matrix} {E_p}^{\prime} \\ p_{px}^{\prime} \\  p_{py}^{\prime} \\  p_{pz}^{\prime} \end{matrix} \right )= \left ( \begin{matrix} 1.4563\gamma_{cm} - 0.9924 \gamma_{cm} \beta_{cm}  \\ 0.3697 \\ -0.3447  \\-1.4563 \gamma_{cm} \beta_{cm} + 0.9924\gamma_{cm} \end{matrix} \right ) = \left ( \begin{matrix} 1.17939 \\ 0.3697 \\ -0.3447  \\ -0.505023 \end{matrix} \right )</math><br>
 
−
 
 
−
;<math>\pi^-</math>:<math>\left ( \begin{matrix} {E_{\pi^-}}^{\prime} \\ p_{\pi^- x}^{\prime} \\  p_{{\pi^-} y}^{\prime} \\  p_{{\pi^-} z}^{\prime} \end{matrix} \right )= \left ( \begin{matrix} 0.5757\gamma_{cm} - 0.3282 \gamma_{cm} \beta_{cm}  \\ 0.1052 \\ -0.4394  \\ -0.5757 \gamma_{cm} \beta_{cm} + 0.3282\gamma_{cm} \end{matrix} \right ) = \left ( \begin{matrix} 0.5738  \\ 0.1052 \\ -0.4394  \\ -0.324868 \end{matrix} \right )</math><br>
 
−
 
 
−
<math>\vec {P_{tot}}^{\prime} = (p_{ex}^{\prime} + p_{px}^{\prime} + p_{\pi^-x}^{\prime})\hat{x} + (p_{ey}^{\prime} + p_{py}^{\prime} + p_{\pi^-y}^{\prime})\hat{y} + (p_{ez}^{\prime} + p_{pz}^{\prime} + p_{\pi^-z}^{\prime})\hat{z} = - 0.0741 \hat{x} + 0.1899 \hat{y} + 0.13 \hat{z} </math><br>
 
−
 
 
−
;Missing Mass
 
−
 
 
−
;Conservation of the 4-momentum gives us following<br>
 
−
 
 
−
<math>(P_e)^\mu + (P_p)^\mu = ({P_e}^{\prime})^\mu + ({P_X}^{\prime})^\mu + ({P_{\pi^-}}^{\prime})^\mu</math> <br>
 
−
<math>(P_e)_\mu + (P_p)_\mu = ({P_e}^{\prime})_\mu + ({P_X}^{\prime})_\mu + ({P_{\pi^-}}^{\prime})_\mu</math> <br>
 
−
 
 
−
;Solving it for the final proton state<br>
 
−
 
 
−
<math>{M_x}^2 = ({P_X}^{\prime})_\mu({P_X}^{\prime})^\mu = [(P_e)_\mu + (P_p)_\mu - ({P_e}^{\prime})_\mu - ({P_{\pi^-}}^{\prime})_\mu][(P_e)^\mu + (P_p)^\mu - ({P_e}^{\prime})^\mu - ({P_{\pi^-}}^{\prime})^\mu]</math><br>
 
−
 
 
−
;In our case 4-vectors for particles are<br>
 
−
 
 
−
<math>(P_e)_\mu = ( 5.736, 0, 0, 5.736 GeV)</math><br>
 
−
<math>(P_p)_\mu = (m_p, 0, 0, 0)</math><br>
 
−
<math>({P_e}^{\prime})_\mu = (4.4914861, -0.549, 0.974, 4.3501 )</math><br>
 
−
<math>({P_{\pi^-}}^{\prime})_\mu = (0.575721, 0.1052, -0.4394, 0.3282)</math><br>
 
−
 
 
−
;Plug and chug<br>
 
−
 
 
−
<math>{M_x}^2 = [( 5.736, 0, 0, 5.736 GeV) + ( m_p, 0, 0, 0 ) - (4.4914861, -0.549, 0.974, 4.3501 ) - (0.575721, 0.1052, -0.4394, 0.3282)</math>] [<math>\left (\begin{matrix} 5.736  \\ 0 \\ 0  \\ 5.736 \end{matrix} \right )</math> + <math>\left (\begin{matrix} m_p  \\ 0 \\ 0  \\ 0 \end{matrix} \right) </math> - <math>\left (\begin{matrix} 4.4914861  \\ -0.549 \\  0.974 \\ 4.3501 \end{matrix} \right) </math> - <math>\left ( \begin{matrix}0.575721  \\ 0.1052 \\  -0.4394 \\ 0.3282 \end{matrix} \right) ] = 0.981198614 GeV^2</math>
 
−
 
 
−
<math>M_x = 0.9905547 GeV</math><br>
 
−
 
 
−
=====Example of  the Missing Mass Calculation for the following reaction  <math>\vec{e}p \rightarrow (e^-)^{\prime} n \pi^+</math> =====
 
−
 
 
−
Used file dst27095_05.B00. Target <math>NH_3</math>, Beam Energy 5.735 GeV and Torus Current +2250. Event_number=3106861<br>
 
−
 
 
−
[[Image:event_number_3106861_sector_1_4.jpg|200px]]
 
−
[[Image:event_number_3106861_sector_3_6.jpg|200px]]
 
−
[[Image:event_number_3106861_calorimeter.jpg|200px]]
 
−
[[Image:event_number_3106861_particle_momentums_sectors_phi_angle.jpg|225px]]<br>
 
−
 
 
−
:<math>p_e = 5.736 Gev \sim E_e</math> : electron mass is negligible
 
−
:<math>m_p = 0.938 GeV</math> : Mass of a proton
 
−
:<math>m_n = 0.939566 GeV</math> : Mass of a neutron
 
−
:<math>\beta_{cm} = \frac{5.736}{6.674} = 0.859 < 1</math><br>
 
−
:<math>\gamma_{cm} = \frac{1}{\sqrt{1 - \beta_{cm}^2}} = \frac{1}{\sqrt{1 - 0.859^2}} = 1.9559</math><br>
 
−
 
 
−
:<math>\left ( \begin{matrix} {E_e}^{\prime} \\ p_{ex}^{\prime} \\  p_{ey}^{\prime} \\  p_{ez}^{\prime} \end{matrix} \right )= \left [ \begin{matrix} \gamma_{cm}  & 0 & 0 & -\gamma_{cm} \beta_{cm} \\ 0 & 1 &0 &0 \\ 0 &0 &1 &0 \\ -\gamma_{cm} \beta_{cm} &0 &0 &\gamma_{cm}\end{matrix} \right ] \left ( \begin{matrix} E_e=2.7165 \\ 0.8769 \\ -0.117  \\ 2.5684 \end{matrix} \right )</math><br>
 
−
 
 
−
:<math>\left ( \begin{matrix} {E_n}^{\prime} \\ p_{nx}^{\prime} \\  p_{ny}^{\prime} \\  p_{nz}^{\prime} \end{matrix} \right )= \left [ \begin{matrix} \gamma_{cm}  & 0 & 0 & -\gamma_{cm} \beta_{cm} \\ 0 & 1 &0 &0 \\ 0 &0 &1 &0 \\  -\gamma_{cm} \beta_{cm} &0 &0 & \gamma_{cm} \end{matrix} \right ] \left ( \begin{matrix} E_n =2.0218 \\ -0.4811 \\ -0.9008  \\ 1.4704 \end{matrix} \right )</math><br>
 
−
 
 
−
:<math>\left ( \begin{matrix} {E_{\pi^+}}^{\prime} \\ p_{\pi^+ x}^{\prime} \\  p_{{\pi^+} y}^{\prime} \\  p_{{\pi^+} z}^{\prime} \end{matrix} \right )= \left [ \begin{matrix} \gamma_{cm}  & 0 & 0 & -\gamma_{cm} \beta_{cm} \\ 0 & 1 &0 &0 \\ 0 &0 &1 &0 \\ -\gamma_{cm} \beta_{cm} &0 &0 & \gamma_{cm} \end{matrix} \right ] \left ( \begin{matrix} E_{\pi^+} =2.3431 \\ -0.6918 \\ 0.8242  \\ 2.0764 \end{matrix} \right )</math><br>
 
−
 
 
−
 
 
−
;Electron:<math>\left ( \begin{matrix} {E_e}^{\prime} \\ p_{ex}^{\prime} \\  p_{ey}^{\prime} \\  p_{ez}^{\prime} \end{matrix} \right )=  \left ( \begin{matrix} 2.7165 \gamma_{cm} - 2.5684 \gamma_{cm} \beta_{cm} \\ 0.8769 \\ -0.117  \\  -2.7165\gamma_{cm} \beta_{cm} + 2.5684 \gamma_{cm} \end{matrix} \right ) = \left ( \begin{matrix} 0.99569 \\ 0.8769 \\ -0.117  \\ 0.45728 \end{matrix} \right )</math><br>
 
−
 
 
−
;Neutron:<math>\left ( \begin{matrix} {E_n}^{\prime} \\ p_{nx}^{\prime} \\  p_{ny}^{\prime} \\  p_{nz}^{\prime} \end{matrix} \right )= \left ( \begin{matrix} 2.0218\gamma_{cm} - 1.4704 \gamma_{cm} \beta_{cm}  \\ -0.4811 \\ -0.9008  \\-2.0218 \gamma_{cm} \beta_{cm} + 1.4704\gamma_{cm} \end{matrix} \right ) = \left ( \begin{matrix} 1.4828 \\ -0.4811 \\ -0.9008 \\ -0.52256 \end{matrix} \right )</math><br>
 
−
 
 
−
;<math>\pi^+</math>:<math>\left ( \begin{matrix} {E_{\pi^+}}^{\prime} \\ p_{\pi^+ x}^{\prime} \\  p_{{\pi^+} y}^{\prime} \\  p_{{\pi^+} z}^{\prime} \end{matrix} \right )= \left ( \begin{matrix} 2.3431\gamma_{cm} - 2.0764 \gamma_{cm} \beta_{cm}  \\ -0.6918 \\ 0.8242  \\ -2.3431 \gamma_{cm} \beta_{cm} + 2.0764\gamma_{cm} \end{matrix} \right ) = \left ( \begin{matrix} 1.09257  \\ -0.6918 \\ 0.8242  \\ 0.1226 \end{matrix} \right )</math><br>
 
−
 
 
−
<math>\vec {P_{tot}}^{\prime} = (p_{ex}^{\prime} + p_{nx}^{\prime} + p_{\pi^+x}^{\prime})\hat{x} + (p_{ey}^{\prime} + p_{ny}^{\prime} + p_{\pi^+y}^{\prime})\hat{y} + (p_{ez}^{\prime} + p_{nz}^{\prime} + p_{\pi^+z}^{\prime})\hat{z} = -0.296 \hat{x} + -0.1936 \hat{y} + 0.0573 \hat{z} </math><br>
 
−
 
 
−
;Missing Mass Calculation
 
−
 
 
−
;Below is the conservation of the 4-momentum<br>
 
−
 
 
−
<math>(P_e)^\mu + (P_p)^\mu = ({P_e}^{\prime})^\mu + ({P_X}^{\prime})^\mu + ({P_{\pi^+}}^{\prime})^\mu</math> <br>
 
−
<math>(P_e)_\mu + (P_p)_\mu = ({P_e}^{\prime})_\mu + ({P_X}^{\prime})_\mu + ({P_{\pi^+}}^{\prime})_\mu</math> <br>
 
−
 
 
−
;Solving it for the final neutron state<br>
 
−
 
 
−
<math>{M_x}^2 = ({P_X}^{\prime})_\mu({P_X}^{\prime})^\mu = [(P_e)_\mu + (P_p)_\mu - ({P_e}^{\prime})_\mu - ({P_{\pi^+}}^{\prime})_\mu][(P_e)^\mu + (P_p)^\mu - ({P_e}^{\prime})^\mu - ({P_{\pi^+}}^{\prime})^\mu]</math><br>
 
−
 
 
−
;The 4-vectors for the particles in this event<br>
 
−
 
 
−
<math>(P_e)_\mu = ( 5.736, 0, 0, 5.736 GeV)</math><br>
 
−
<math>(P_p)_\mu = (m_p, 0, 0, 0)</math><br>
 
−
<math>({P_e}^{\prime})_\mu = (2.7164, 0.8769, -0.117, 2.5684 )</math><br>
 
−
<math>({P_{\pi^+}}^{\prime})_\mu = (2.3431, -0.6918, 0.8242, 2.0764)</math><br>
 
−
 
 
−
<math>{M_x}^2 = [( 5.736, 0, 0, 5.736 GeV) + ( m_p, 0, 0, 0 ) - ( 2.7164, 0.8769, -0.117, 2.5684 ) - ( 2.3431, -0.6918, 0.8242, 2.0764 )</math>] [<math>\left (\begin{matrix} 5.736  \\ 0 \\ 0  \\ 5.736 \end{matrix} \right )</math> + <math>\left (\begin{matrix} m_p  \\ 0 \\ 0  \\ 0 \end{matrix} \right) </math> - <math>\left (\begin{matrix} 2.7164 \\ 0.8769 \\ -0.117 \\ 2.5684 \end{matrix} \right) </math> - <math>\left ( \begin{matrix}  2.3431 \\ -0.6918 \\  0.8242 \\ 2.0764\end{matrix} \right) ] = 0.882724889 GeV^2</math>
 
−
 
 
−
<math>M_x = 0.9395344 GeV</math><br>
 
−
 
 
−
<math>\phi_{diff}^{LAB} = \phi_e^{LAB} - \phi_{\pi^+}^{LAB} = (120 + 35.3) -26.4 = 128.9</math>
 
−
 
 
−
=====<math>{\phi_{\pi}}^{CM}</math> transformation from LAB frame to CM frame=====
 
−
 
 
−
:<math>\beta_{cm} = \frac{5.736}{6.674} = 0.859 < 1</math><br>
 
−
:<math>\gamma_{cm} = \frac{1}{\sqrt{1 - \beta_{cm}^2}} = \frac{1}{\sqrt{1 - 0.859^2}} = 1.9559</math><br>
 
−
 
 
−
:<math>E_e = \sqrt{{p_e}^2 + {m_e}^2} = \sqrt{0.8769^2 + 0.117^2 + 2.56842^2} = 2.7165</math><br>
 
−
 
 
−
;Calculation of <math>{{\phi}_{\gamma}}^{CM}</math>
 
−
 
 
−
:<math>{\phi_{\gamma}}^{CM} = tan^{-1}(\frac{{p_{e z}}^{CM}}{{p_{e z}}^{ CM \prime}})</math><br>
 
−
 
 
−
:<math>{p_{e z}}^{CM} = -\gamma_{CM} \beta_{CM}{p_{e z}}^{LAB} + \gamma_{CM} {p_{e z}}^{LAB} = </math><br>
 
−
 
 
−
::<math> = -1.9559 \times 0.8594 \times 5.736 + 1.9559 \times 5.736 = 1.5773 </math><br>
 
−
 
 
−
:<math>{p_{e z}}^{CM \prime} = -\gamma_{CM} \beta_{CM} E_e + \gamma_{CM} {p_{e z}}^{LAB \prime} = </math><br>
 
−
 
 
−
::<math>= -1.9559 \times 0.8594 \times 2.7165 + 1.9559 \times 2.5684 = 0.4574 </math><br>
 
−
 
 
−
:<math>\phi_{\gamma} = tan^{-1}(\frac{1.5773}{0.4574}) = 73.83  </math><br>
 
−
 
 
−
;Calculation of <math>{\theta_x}^{CM}</math>
 
−
 
 
−
 
 
−
<math>{\theta_x}^{CM} = arccos(\frac{p_{e z}^{CM \prime} - {p_{e z}}^{CM}}{\sqrt{{p_{e x}^{CM \prime}}^2 + {p_{e y}^{CM \prime}}^2 + ({p_{e z}^{CM \prime} - {p_{e z}}^{CM}})^2}}) = </math><br>
 
−
 
 
−
::<math> = cos^{-1}(\frac{0.4574 - 1.5773}{\sqrt{0.8769^2 + (-0.117)^2 + (0.4574 - 1.5773)^2}}) = 141.69 </math><br>
 
−
 
 
−
 
 
−
;Calculation of <math>{\phi_{\pi}}^{CM}</math>
 
−
 
 
−
:<math>E_{\pi} = \sqrt{{p_{\pi}}^2 + {m_{\pi}}^2} = </math><br>
 
−
 
 
−
::<math> = \sqrt{(-0.6918)^2 + 0.8242^2 + 2.0764^2 + 0.13969^2} = 2.34282 </math><br>
 
−
 
 
−
=====Missing_Mass(experimental data)=====
 
−
 
 
−
[[Image:w_missing_mass_no_cuts_27095_experimental_data.gif|200px]]
 
−
 
 
−
The mean value of the missing mass is around 2.056 GeV.
 
−
 
 
−
<math>{M_x}^2 = ((k_i + p_i) - (k_f + q_{\pi^-}))</math><br>
 
−
 
 
−
where <math>k_i</math> and <math>k_f</math> - are the 4-momentum of the incident and final electron, <math>p_i</math> - the 4-momentum of the target(proton),  <math>q_{\pi^-}</math> - the 4-vector of the <math>\pi^-</math>.<br>
 
−
 
 
−
=====<math>\phi</math> angle=====
 
−
====== <math>\phi</math> angle for electrons and pions (<math>\pi^+</math>) in lab frame <math>\phi_{e^-}^{LAB}</math>, <math>\phi_{\pi^+}^{LAB}</math>======
 
−
 
 
−
Used file is dst27095_05.B00.Target material is <math>NH_3</math>, Torus +2250 and beam energy 5.7 GeV<br>
 
−
 
 
−
{|border="2" colspan = "4"
 
−
!For Electrons <math>e^-</math> with cuts (e_p<3, <math>EC_{tot}>0.2p</math>, <math>EC_{inner}>0.08p</math>, nphe>2.5 and sc_paddle=7) ||For Pions(<math>\pi^+</math>) with cuts for sc_paddle=7
 
−
|-
 
−
|| [[Image:the_absolute_phi_angle_for_electrons_in_lab_frame_with_all_cuts_applied_used_file_dst27095.gif|400px]]
 
−
|| [[Image:the_absolute_phi_angle_for_pions_in_lab_frame_with_all_cuts_applied_used_file_dst27095.gif|400px]]
 
−
|}<br>
 
−
 
 
−
{|border="2"
 
−
|-
 
−
! colspan="3" | For Electrons with cuts (e_p<3, <math>EC_{tot}>0.2p</math>, <math>EC_{inner}>0.08p</math>, nphe>2.5 and sc_paddle=7)
 
−
|-
 
−
! SECTOR 1 || SECTOR 2 || SECTOR 3
 
−
|-
 
−
|| [[Image:electron_phi_angle_lab_frame_with_cuts_sc_paddle_7_sector_1_file_dst27095.gif|200px]]
 
−
|| [[Image:electron_phi_angle_lab_frame_with_cuts_sc_paddle_7_sector_2_file_dst27095.gif|200px]]
 
−
|| [[Image:electron_phi_angle_lab_frame_with_cuts_sc_paddle_7_sector_3_file_dst27095.gif|200px]]
 
−
|-
 
−
! SECTOR 4 || SECTOR 5 || SECTOR 6
 
−
|-
 
−
|| [[Image:electron_phi_angle_lab_frame_with_cuts_sc_paddle_7_sector_4_file_dst27095.gif|200px]]
 
−
|| [[Image:electron_phi_angle_lab_frame_with_cuts_sc_paddle_7_sector_5_file_dst27095.gif|200px]]
 
−
|| [[Image:electron_phi_angle_lab_frame_with_cuts_sc_paddle_7_sector_6_file_dst27095.gif|200px]]
 
−
|}<br>
 
−
 
 
−
{|border="2"
 
−
|-
 
−
! colspan="3" | For pions(<math>\pi^+</math>) with cuts for sc_paddle=7
 
−
|-
 
−
! SECTOR 1 || SECTOR 2 || SECTOR 3
 
−
|-
 
−
|| [[Image:pions_plus_phi_angle_lab_frame_with_cuts_sc_paddle_7_sector_1_file_dst27095.gif|200px]]
 
−
|| [[Image:pions_plus_phi_angle_lab_frame_with_cuts_sc_paddle_7_sector_2_file_dst27095.gif|200px]]
 
−
|| [[Image:pions_plus_phi_angle_lab_frame_with_cuts_sc_paddle_7_sector_3_file_dst27095.gif|200px]]
 
−
|-
 
−
! SECTOR 4 || SECTOR 5 || SECTOR 6
 
−
|-
 
−
|| [[Image:pions_plus_phi_angle_lab_frame_with_cuts_sc_paddle_7_sector_4_file_dst27095.gif|200px]]
 
−
|| [[Image:pions_plus_phi_angle_lab_frame_with_cuts_sc_paddle_7_sector_5_file_dst27095.gif|200px]]
 
−
|| [[Image:pions_plus_phi_angle_lab_frame_with_cuts_sc_paddle_7_sector_6_file_dst27095.gif|200px]]
 
−
|}<br>
 
−
 
 
−
Determine which electron cut is removing the bumps
 
−
 
 
−
The plots below show what happens when you require the Npe from electron to be > 1 and you only look for pions in scintillator paddle 7.<br>
 
−
 
 
−
why does histogram with cuts have same number of events?  create root file to look at
 
−
{|border="2" colspan = "4"
 
−
||[[Image:phi_angle_difference_cuts_on_electrons_and_pions_no_cuts_on_sc_paddle_and_on_nphe_file_dst27095.gif|400px]]
 
−
||[[Image:phi_angle_difference_cuts_on_electrons_pions_and_nphe_no_cuts_on_sc_paddle_file_dst27095.gif|400px]]
 
−
||[[Image:phi_angle_difference_cuts_on_electrons_pions_and_nphe_no_cuts_on_sc_paddle_file_dst27095_1.gif|400px]]
 
−
|}<br>
 
−
 
 
−
Write equation for<math> \phi_{\pi}^{CM}</math> in terms of Lab frame Momentum and energy.
 
−
 
 
−
Graph <math>\phi_{\pi}^{CM}</math> for Pions hitting paddle #7.  The y-axis should be pion counting rate in units of pions per nanCoulomb.
 
−
 
 
−
======<math>\phi</math> angle in the Center of Mass Frame======
 
−
 
 
−
The variables below are in Lab Frame:<br>
 
−
 
 
−
From [http://arxiv.org/abs/0709.1946 <math>\vec{e}p \rightarrow n \pi^+</math>  from CLAS]<br>
 
−
 
 
−
{| border="0" style="background:transparent;"  align="center"
 
−
|-
 
−
|
 
−
[[Image:kinematics_single_pion_electroproduction_1.jpg|300px|thumb|Kinematics of single <math>\pi^+</math> electroproduction]]
 
−
|}<br>
 
−
<br>
 
−
 
 
−
From the above picture we can write down the momentum x,y and z components for pion in terms of angle and total momentum.<br>
 
−
 
 
−
<math>{p_{\pi x}}^{LAB{\prime}} = p_{\pi}^{LAB{\prime}} {sin {\theta}}_{\pi}^{LAB} cos {\phi}_{\pi}^{LAB}</math><br>
 
−
 
 
−
<math>{p_{\pi y}}^{LAB{\prime}} = p_{pi}^{LAB{\prime}} {sin {\theta}}_{\pi}^{LAB} sin {\phi}_{\pi}^{LAB}</math><br>
 
−
 
 
−
<math>{\phi}_{\pi}^{LAB{\prime}} = arctg(\frac{{p_{\pi y}}^{LAB{\prime}}}{{p_{\pi x}}^{LAB{\prime}}})</math><br>
 
−
 
 
−
where <math>{p_{\pi x}}^{LAB{\prime}}</math> and <math>{p_{\pi y}}^{LAB{\prime}}</math> are  the x and y components of the pion momentum.<br>
 
−
 
 
−
 
 
−
now rotate about <math>\phi</math> angle
 
−
 
 
−
  Dr. Forests notes<br>
 
−
 
 
−
[[Image:rotation_around_phi_gamma_angle.fig]]
 
−
 
 
−
 
 
−
<math>(P_e)^{\mu}</math> - Initial electron 4-momentum<br>
 
−
<math>(P_N)^{\mu}</math> - Target Nucleon 4-momentum<br>
 
−
<math>(P_e^{\prime})^{ \mu}</math> - Scattered electron 4-momentum<br>
 
−
<math>(P_h)^{\mu}</math> - Hadron final state 4-momentum<br>
 
−
<math>(P_m)^{\mu}</math> - Meson final state 4-momentum<br>
 
−
 
 
−
<math>h=n</math>, <math>m=\pi^+</math> for <math>\vec{e} (\vec{p},\vec{e}^{\prime}) \pi^+ n</math> <br>
 
−
 
 
−
 
 
−
In Inclusive <math>\vec{e} (\vec{p},\vec{e}^{\prime}) X </math><br>
 
−
 
 
−
Then The Missing Mass <math>W = (E_x ^2 - p_x ^2)</math><br>
 
−
 
 
−
 
 
−
In Exclusive <math>\vec{e} (\vec{p},\vec{e}^{\prime}) \pi^+ X</math>
 
−
 
 
−
Then Missing Mass <math> M = (E_h ^2 - p_h ^2)</math><br>
 
−
 
 
−
 
 
−
Conservation of 4-momentum gives <br>
 
−
 
 
−
<math>(P_e)^\mu + (P_N)^\mu = ({P_e}^{\prime})^\mu + {P_h}^\mu + ({P_m})^\mu</math> <br>
 
−
 
 
−
<math>{P_h}^\mu = (P_e)^\mu - ({P_e}^{\prime})^\mu + (P_N)^\mu -({P_m})^\mu</math><br>
 
−
 
−
Dr. Forest's notes
 
−
 
 
−
<math>q^\mu</math> - 4-momentum of the exchanged virtual photon(<math>\gamma</math>)<br>
 
−
 
 
−
<math>q^\mu = (P_e^{\prime})^\mu - P_e ^{\mu} = (p_e ^{\prime}, {\vec{p}_e} ^{\prime}) - (p_e, {\vec{p}_e}) = </math><br>
 
−
 
 
−
 
 
−
<math> = (p_e ^{\prime} - p_e,{\vec{p}_e} ^{\prime} - {\vec{p}_e} ) = (0(???????????),{\vec{p}_e} ^{\prime} - {\vec{p}_e}) = (0(?????????), p_{e,x}^{\prime}\hat{x} + p_{e,y}^{\prime}\hat{y} + (p_{e,z}^{\prime} - p_{e,z})\hat{z})</math><br>
 
−
 
 
−
 
 
−
<math>\phi = arctg(\frac{p_{e x}^{\prime}}{p_{e z}^{\prime}})</math><br>
 
−
 
 
−
 
 
−
<math>\theta_x = arccos(\frac{p_{e z}^{\prime} - p_{e z}}{\sqrt{{p_{e x}^{\prime}}^2 + {p_{e y}^{\prime}}^2 + ({p_{e z}^{\prime} - p_{e z}})^2}})</math><br>
 
−
 
 
−
<math>p_{e x}^{\prime} = p_{e x}^{\prime CM}</math><br>
 
−
 
 
−
<math>p_{e y}^{\prime} = p_{e y}^{\prime CM}</math><br>
 
−
 
 
−
<math>p_{e z}^{\prime CM} = -E_e \gamma_{CM} \beta_{CM} + p_{e z }^{\prime LAB} \gamma_{CM}</math> <br>
 
−
 
 
−
<math>p_{e z}^{CM} = -p_{e z}^{LAB} \gamma_{CM} \beta_{CM} + p_{e z}^{LAB} \gamma_{CM}</math><br>
 
−
 
 
−
<math>p_{e z}^{LAB} =  Beam Energy </math><br>
 
−
 
 
−
<math>\left ( \begin{matrix} p_{\pi x}^{LAB{\prime}} \\ p_{\pi y}^{LAB{\prime}} \\p_{\pi z}^{LAB{\prime}}  \end{matrix} \right )= \left [ \begin{matrix} cos {\theta}_x  & 0 & -sin {\theta_x} \\ 0  & 1 &0 \\ sin {\theta_x} &0 & cos {\theta_x}  \end{matrix} \right ] \left  [ \begin{matrix} cos {\phi}  & sin {\phi} & 0 \\ -sin {\phi}  & cos {\phi} &0 \\ 0 &0 & 1  \end{matrix} \right ] \left ( \begin{matrix} p_{\pi x}^{LAB} \\p_{\pi y}^{LAB}  \\ p_{\pi z}^{LAB}  \end{matrix} \right ) = </math> <br>
 
−
 
 
−
<math>= \left ( \begin{matrix} cos {\theta}_x (cos {\phi}  p_{\pi x}^{LAB} + sin {\phi}  p_{\pi y}^{LAB}) - sin {\theta}_x  p_{\pi z}^{LAB} \\ -sin {\phi}  p_{\pi x}^{LAB} + cos {\phi}  p_{\pi y}^{LAB} \\ sin {\theta}_x (cos {\phi}  p_{\pi x}^{LAB} + sin {\phi}  p_{\pi y}^{LAB}) + cos {\theta}_x  p_{\pi z}^{LAB}  \end{matrix} \right ) </math><br>
 
−
 
 
−
 
 
−
<math>{\phi}_{\pi}^{LAB{\prime}} = arctg(\frac{{p_{\pi y}}^{LAB{\prime}}}{{p_{\pi x}}^{LAB{\prime}}}) = arctg(\frac{-sin{\phi} \times p_{\pi x}^{LAB} + cos{\phi} \times p_{\pi y}^{LAB}}{sin{\theta_x}\times(cos{\phi} \times p_{\pi x}^{LAB} + sin{\phi} \times p_{\pi y}^{LAB}) + cos{\theta_x} \times p_{\pi z}^{LAB}})</math><br>
 
−
 
 
−
<math>{\phi}_{\pi}^{CM} = arctg(\frac{{p_{\pi y}}^{CM}}{{p_{\pi x}}^{CM}}) = arctg(\frac{-sin{\phi} \times p_{\pi x}^{CM} + cos{\phi} \times p_{\pi y}^{CM}}{sin{\theta_x}\times(cos{\phi} \times p_{\pi x}^{CM} + sin{\phi} \times p_{\pi y}^{CM}) + cos{\theta_x} \times p_{\pi z}^{CM}})</math><br>
 
−
 
 
−
 
 
−
 
 
−
<math>p_{\pi x}^{CM} = p_{\pi x}^{LAB}</math>
 
−
 
 
−
<math>p_{\pi y}^{CM} = p_{\pi y}^{LAB}</math>
 
−
 
 
−
<math>p_{\pi z}^{CM} = -E_{\pi}  \gamma_{CM}  \beta_{CM} + p_{\pi z}^{LAB} \gamma_{CM}</math>
 
−
 
 
−
angle is in radians<br>
 
−
 
 
−
{|border="2" colspan = "4"
 
−
||[[Image:phi_angle_in_CM_Frame_for_pions_using_theta_x_and_phi_gamma_angles_file_dst27095_without_cuts.gif|200px]]
 
−
||[[Image:phi_angle_in_CM_Frame_for_pions_using_theta_x_and_phi_gamma_angles_file_dst27095_without_cuts_zoomed_in.gif|200px]] 
 
−
|}<br>
 
−
 
 
−
 
 
−
  angle in degrees<br>
 
−
 
 
−
{|border="2" colspan = "4"
 
−
||[[Image:phi_angle_in_CM_Frame_for_pions_using_theta_x_and_phi_gamma_angles_file_dst27095_without_cuts_in_degrees.gif|200px]]
 
−
||[[Image:phi_angle_in_CM_Frame_for_pions_using_theta_x_and_phi_gamma_angles_file_dst27095_without_cuts_zoomed_in_in_degrees.gif|200px]] 
 
−
|}<br>
 
−
 
 
−
 
 
−
The rotation matrix, that rotates the coordinate system around y axis by <math>\theta_x</math> angle is given<br>
 
−
 
−
<math>\left ( \begin{matrix} p_{\pi x}^{LAB{\prime}} \\ p_{\pi y}^{LAB{\prime}} \\p_{\pi z}^{LAB{\prime}}  \end{matrix} \right )= \left [ \begin{matrix} cos {\theta}_x  & 0 & sin {\theta_x} \\ 0  & 1 &0 \\ -sin {\theta_x} &0 & cos {\theta_x}  \end{matrix} \right ] \left ( \begin{matrix} p_{\pi x}^{LAB} \\p_{\pi y}^{LAB}  \\ p_{\pi z}^{LAB}  \end{matrix} \right )</math><br>
 
−
 
 
−
Now, the x, y and z components of the momentum can be written in terms of the momentums of the rotated system.<br>
 
−
 
 
−
<math>p_{\pi x}^{LAB {\prime}} = cos {\theta}_x \times p_{\pi x}^{LAB} + sin {\theta_x} \times p_{\pi z}^{LAB}</math><br>
 
−
 
 
−
<math>p_{\pi y}^{LAB{\prime}} = p_{\pi y}^{LAB}</math><br>
 
−
 
 
−
<math>p_{\pi z}^{LAB{\prime}} = -sin {\theta}_x \times p_{\pi x}^{LAB} + cos {\theta_x} \times p_{\pi z}^{LAB}</math>
 
−
 
 
−
<math>{\phi}_{\pi}^{LAB} = arctg(\frac{p_{\pi y}^{LAB}}{cos {\theta}_x \times p_{\pi x}^{LAB} + sin {\theta_x} \times p_{\pi z}^{LAB}})</math><br>
 
−
 
 
−
<math>{\phi}_{\pi}^{CM} = arctg(\frac{p_{\pi y}^{LAB}}{cos {\theta}_x \times p_{\pi x}^{LAB} + sin {\theta_x} \times (- \gamma_{CM} \beta_{CM} E_{\pi}^{LAB} + \gamma_{CM} p_{\pi z}^{LAB})})</math><br>
 
−
 
 
−
where <math>\theta_x</math> is the angle between the photon and the electron. The angle can be found using the conservation of momentum and energy.<br>
 
−
Conservation of Momentum <math>\Rightarrow</math> :
 
−
 
 
−
<math>\vec{p}_e = \vec{p}_{e^{\prime}} + \vec{p}_{\gamma}</math>  <math>\Rightarrow</math>  <math>\vec{p}_{e^{\prime}} = \vec{p}_e - \vec{p}_{\gamma}</math> <br>
 
−
<math>{p_{e^{\prime}}}^2 = {p_e}^2 - 2 p_e p_{\gamma}cos {\theta_x} + {p_{\gamma}}^2</math><br>
 
−
<math>cos {\theta_x} = \frac {{p_e}^2 + {p_{\gamma}}^2 - {p_{e^{\prime}}}^2}{2 p_e p_{\gamma}}</math><br>
 
−
 
 
−
Conservation of Energy <math>\Rightarrow</math> :
 
−
 
 
−
<math> E_e = E_{e^{\prime}} + E_{\gamma}</math><br>
 
−
<math>\sqrt {(m_e c^2)^2 + (p_e c)^2} = \sqrt {(m_e c^2)^2 + (p_{e^{\prime}} c)^2} + p_{\gamma} c</math><br>
 
−
<math>p_{\gamma} c = \sqrt {(m_e c^2)^2 + (p_e c)^2} - \sqrt {(m_e c^2)^2 + (p_{e^{\prime}} c)^2}</math><br>
 
−
<math>p_{\gamma} = \sqrt {(m_e)^2 + (p_e)^2} - \sqrt {(m_e)^2 + (p_{e^{\prime}})^2}</math><br>
 
−
 
 
−
The <math>cos {\theta_x}</math> can be written in the following way<br>
 
−
<math>cos {\theta_x} = \frac {{p_e}^2 + ( \sqrt {(m_e)^2 + (p_e)^2} - \sqrt {(m_e)^2 + (p_{e^{\prime}})^2})^2 - {p_{e^{\prime}}}^2}{2 p_e ( \sqrt {(m_e)^2 + (p_e)^2} - \sqrt {(m_e)^2 + (p_{e^{\prime}})^2}) }</math> <br>
 
−
 
 
−
  angle is in radians<br>
 
−
 
 
−
{|border="2" colspan = "4"
 
−
||[[Image:phi_angle_in_CM_Frame_for_pions_using_theta_x_angle_file_dst27095_without_cuts.gif|200px]]
 
−
||[[Image:phi_angle_in_CM_Frame_for_pions_using_theta_x_angle_file_dst27095_without_cuts_zoomed_in.gif|200px]] 
 
−
|}<br>
 
−
 
 
−
==== Pion Rates -vs- Paddle for opposite sign Torus fields====
 
−
 
 
−
 
−
 
 
−
 
−
 
 
−
; using all events in which the first particle (the one which caused the trigger) is defined as an electrons and passes the
 
−
[http://www.iac.isu.edu/mediawiki/index.php/Analysis#Electron above electron cuts].
 
−
=====sc_paddle vs X_bjorken 5.7 GeV Beam Energy=====
 
−
 
 
−
{|border="2" colspan = "4"
 
−
!no cuts||cuts ||no cuts ||cuts
 
−
|-
 
−
|Electrons|| B > 0 ||  || B<0
 
−
|-
 
−
|[[Image:electrons_sc_paddle_vs_X_dst_27095_without_cuts.gif|200px]]
 
−
|| [[Image:electrons_sc_paddle_vs_X_dst_27095_with_cuts.gif|200px]]
 
−
|| [[Image:electrons_sc_paddle_vs_X_dst_26988_without_cuts.gif|200px]]
 
−
|| [[Image:electrons_sc_paddle_vs_X_dst_26988_with_cuts.gif|200px]]
 
−
|-
 
−
|<math>\pi^-</math>||B > 0 || || B<0
 
−
|-
 
−
| [[Image:pions^-_sc_paddle_vs_X_dst_27095_without_cuts.gif|200px]]
 
−
|| [[Image:pions^-_sc_paddle_vs_X_dst_27095_with_cuts.gif|200px]]
 
−
|| [[Image:pions^-_sc_paddle_vs_X_dst_26988_without_cuts.gif|200px]]
 
−
|| [[Image:pions^-_sc_paddle_vs_X_dst_26988_with_cuts.gif|200px]]
 
−
|-
 
−
|<math>\pi^+</math>||B > 0 || || B<0
 
−
|-
 
−
| [[Image:pions^plus_sc_paddle_vs_X_dst_27095_without_cuts.gif|200px]]
 
−
|| [[Image:pions^plus_sc_paddle_vs_X_dst_27095_with_cuts.gif|200px]]
 
−
|| [[Image:pions^plus_sc_paddle_vs_X_dst_26988_without_cuts.gif|200px]]
 
−
|| [[Image:pions^plus_sc_paddle_vs_X_dst_26988_with_cuts.gif|200px]]
 
−
|}
 
−
 
 
−
=====sc_paddle vs X_bjorken with cuts 5.7 GeV Beam Energy(number of events=2)=====
 
−
 
 
−
{|border="2" colspan = "4"
 
−
!<math>\pi^-</math>||<math>\pi^-</math>
 
−
|-
 
−
|B>0||B<0
 
−
|-
 
−
| [[Image:pions^-_sc_paddle_vs_X_dst_27095_with_cuts_num_events_2.gif|200px]]
 
−
|| [[Image:pions^-_sc_paddle_vs_X_dst_26988_with_cuts_num_events_2.gif|200px]]
 
−
|-
 
−
!<math>\pi^+</math>||<math>\pi^+</math>
 
−
|-
 
−
|B>0||B<0
 
−
|-
 
−
| [[Image:pions^plus_sc_paddle_vs_X_dst_27095_with_cuts_num_events_2.gif|200px]]
 
−
|| [[Image:pions^plus_sc_paddle_vs_X_dst_26988_with_cuts_num_events_2.gif|200px]]
 
−
|}
 
−
 
 
−
=====sc_paddle vs Momentum 5.7 GeV Beam Energy=====
 
−
 
 
−
There is a curvature problem.  When B > 0 then I expect the high momentum electrons to hit the lower
 
−
paddle numbers  (inbending).  I can see this when I look at the B>0 plot for electrons with cuts. 
 
−
When B < 0 then the electrons  are bending outwards which makes me expect the the higher momentum
 
−
electrons will high the higher numbered paddles.  I do not see this for B>0 with electron cuts.
 
−
 
 
−
{|border="2" colspan = "4"
 
−
!no cuts||cuts ||no cuts || cuts
 
−
|-
 
−
|Electons||B > 0  ||  || B<0
 
−
|-
 
−
|[[Image:electrons_sc_paddle_vs_momentum_dst_27095_without_cuts.gif|200px]]
 
−
||[[Image:electrons_sc_paddle_vs_momentum_dst_27095_with_cuts.gif|200px]]
 
−
|| [[Image:electrons_sc_paddle_vs_momentum_dst_26988_without_cuts.gif|200px]]
 
−
|| [[Image:electrons_sc_paddle_vs_momentum_dst_26988_with_cuts.gif|200px]]
 
−
|-
 
−
|<math>\pi^-</math>||B > 0 || || B<0
 
−
|-
 
−
| [[Image:pions^-_sc_paddle_vs_momentum_dst_27095_without_cuts.gif|200px]]
 
−
|| [[Image:pions^-_sc_paddle_vs_momentum_dst_27095_with_cuts.gif|200px]]<br>
 
−
|| [[Image:pions^-_sc_paddle_vs_momentum_dst_26988_without_cuts.gif|200px]]
 
−
|| [[Image:pions^-_sc_paddle_vs_momentum_dst_26988_with_cuts.gif|200px]]<br>
 
−
|-
 
−
|<math>\pi^+</math>||B > 0 || || B<0
 
−
|-
 
−
| [[Image:pions^plus_sc_paddle_vs_momentum_dst_27095_without_cuts.gif|200px]]
 
−
|| [[Image:pions^plus_sc_paddle_vs_momentum_dst_27095_with_cuts.gif|200px]]<br>
 
−
|| [[Image:pions^plus_sc_paddle_vs_momentum_dst_26988_without_cuts.gif|200px]]
 
−
|| [[Image:pions^plus_sc_paddle_vs_momentum_dst_26988_with_cuts.gif|200px]]<br>
 
−
|}
 
−
 
 
−
=====sc_paddle vs Momentum with cuts 5.7 GeV Beam Energy(number of events=2)=====
 
−
 
 
−
{|border="2" colspan = "4"
 
−
!<math>\pi^-</math>||<math>\pi^-</math>
 
−
|-
 
−
|B>0||B<0
 
−
|-
 
−
| [[Image:pions^-_sc_paddle_vs_momentum_dst_27095_with_cuts_num_events_2.gif|200px]]
 
−
|| [[Image:pions^-_sc_paddle_vs_momentum_dst_26988_with_cuts_num_events_2.gif|200px]]
 
−
|-
 
−
!<math>\pi^+</math>||<math>\pi^+</math>
 
−
|-
 
−
|B>0||B<0
 
−
|-
 
−
| [[Image:pions^plus_sc_paddle_vs_momentum_dst_27095_with_cuts_num_events_2.gif|200px]]
 
−
|| [[Image:pions^plus_sc_paddle_vs_momentum_dst_26988_with_cuts_num_events_2.gif|200px]]
 
−
|}
 
−
 
 
−
 
 
−
Used file dst26988_05.B00(Energy=5.7GeV and Torus=-2250)<br>
 
−
 
 
−
[[Image:f_cup_dst26988_05.gif|200px]]
 
−
[[Image:f_cup_int_dst26988_05.gif|200px]]
 
−
[[Image:number_of_pions_dst26988_05.gif|200px]]<br>
 
−
 
 
−
 
 
−
 
 
−
===== Paddle 7 Rates and statistics=====
 
−
 
 
−
The number of events per trigger is measured for the respective DST file above and then the Total number events in the data set is estimated from that.
 
−
{|border="2" colspan = "5"
 
−
!<math>X_{bj}</math>||<math>\pi^-</math>(B>0)|| || <math>\pi^+</math>(B<0)||
 
−
|-
 
−
|  ||  Total Number Events <math>(10^{3})</math> ||Number events per <math>10^6</math> triggers ||  Total Number Events <math>(10^{3})</math>|| Number events per  <math>10^6</math> trigger
 
−
|-
 
−
| 0.1 ||5.1 ||71 ||24.6 ||547
 
−
|-
 
−
| 0.2 ||6.9 ||96 ||13.7 ||305
 
−
|-
 
−
| 0.3 ||3.7 ||51 ||6.2 ||137
 
−
|-
 
−
| 0.4 ||3.3 ||45 ||2.7 ||60
 
−
|-
 
−
| 0.5 ||0.9 ||13 ||0.99 ||22
 
−
|-
 
−
|}
 
−
 
 
−
===== Paddle 17 Rates and statistics=====
 
−
 
 
−
{|border="2" colspan = "5"
 
−
!<math>X_{bj}</math>||<math>\pi^-</math>(B<0)|| || <math>\pi^+</math>(B>0)||
 
−
|-
 
−
|  ||Total Number Events  <math>(10^{3})</math>||Number events per <math>10^{6}</math> trigger  ||Total Number Events <math>(10^{3})</math>||Number events per <math>10^{6}</math> trigger 
 
−
|-
 
−
| 0.1 ||6.2 ||137 ||4.6 ||64
 
−
|-
 
−
| 0.2 ||3.5 ||79 ||4.9 ||67
 
−
|-
 
−
| 0.3 ||1.7 ||39 ||2.6 ||36
 
−
|-
 
−
| 0.4 ||0.3 ||7 ||2.1 ||29
 
−
|-
 
−
| 0.5 ||0.1 ||2 ||0.6 ||8
 
−
|-
 
−
|}
 
−
 
 
−
===== Paddle 5 and 8 Rates and statistics for electrons=====
 
−
 
 
−
{|border="2" colspan = "5"
 
−
!<math>X_{bj}</math>||<math>e^-</math> sc_paddle=5 (B>0)|| ||<math>e^-</math> sc_paddle=8 (B<0)||
 
−
|-
 
−
|  ||  Total Number Events <math>(10^{3})</math>|| Number events per <math>10^{6}</math> trigger <math>(10^{3})</math>||Total Number Events <math>(10^{3})</math>||Number events per <math>10^{6}</math> trigger  <math>(10^{4})</math>
 
−
|-
 
−
| 0.1 ||384.9 ||5.314||1665.2 ||3.706
 
−
|-
 
−
| 0.2 ||382.5 ||5.282 ||977.8 ||2.176
 
−
|-
 
−
| 0.3 ||264.9 ||3.657 ||567.1 ||1.262
 
−
|-
 
−
| 0.4 ||159.5 ||2.202 ||328.6 ||0.7313
 
−
|-
 
−
| 0.5 ||99 ||1.367 ||218.2 ||0.4856
 
−
|}
 
−
 
 
−
=====Histograms for 5.7 GeV Beam Energy=====
 
−
 
 
−
{|border="2" colspan = "4"
 
−
!Electron energy/momentum||Electron Theta (<math>\theta</math>)  ||Electron Qsqrd  ||Electron X_bjorken
 
−
|-
 
−
|B>0 and sc_paddle=5||  ||  ||
 
−
|-
 
−
|[[Image:electrons_energy_momentum_dst_27095_with_cuts.gif|200px]]
 
−
||[[Image:electrons_theta_dst_27095_with_cuts.gif|200px]]
 
−
|| [[Image:electrons_Qsqrd_dst_27095_with_cuts.gif|200px]]
 
−
|| [[Image:electrons_X_bjorken_dst_27095_with_cuts.gif|200px]]
 
−
|-
 
−
|B<0 and sc_paddle=8||  ||  ||
 
−
|-
 
−
|[[Image:electrons_energy_momentum_dst_26988_with_cuts.gif|200px]]
 
−
||[[Image:electrons_theta_dst_26988_with_cuts.gif|200px]]
 
−
|| [[Image:electrons_Qsqrd_dst_26988_with_cuts.gif|200px]]
 
−
|| [[Image:electrons_X_bjorken_dst_26988_with_cuts.gif|200px]]
 
−
|-
 
−
|}
 
−
 
 
−
=====Normalized X_bjorken for electrons=====
 
−
 
 
−
{|border="2" colspan = "4"
 
−
!B>0 and sc_paddle=5|| B<0 and sc_paddle=8   
 
−
|-
 
−
|[[Image:X_bjorken_electrons_with_cuts_sc_paddle_5_dst27095.gif|200px]]
 
−
||[[Image:X_bjorken_electrons_with_cuts__sc_paddle_8_dst26988.gif|200px]]
 
−
|}
 
−
 
 
−
==Asymmetries==
 
−
 
 
−
== Systematic Errors==
 
−
 
 
−
[[Media:SebastianSysErrIncl.pdf]] Sebastian's Writeup
 

Latest revision as of 18:49, 13 January 2009

Particle Identification
Quality Checks

EG1_Teleconferences_DeltaDoverD

[Back to Delta_D_over_D]


phi angle in CM frame for different runs

some things

Retrieved from "https://wiki.iac.isu.edu/index.php?title=Analysis&oldid=20689"