Difference between revisions of "Analysis"

Latest revision as of 18:49, 13 January 2009

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-=Particle Identification=
+[[Particle Identification]]<br>
-==Electron==
+[[Quality Checks]]<br>
-==Pion==
-=Quality Checks=
-==Rates==
-==Asymmetries==
-== Cuts ==
+[[EG1_Teleconferences_DeltaDoverD]]
- <math>EC_{tot}>0.2*p</math>
+[[http://wiki.iac.isu.edu/index.php/Delta_D_over_D Back to Delta_D_over_D]]
-[[Image:Etotal_over_P_using_tot_cut.gif]]<br>
+[[ phi angle in CM frame for different runs]]<br>
-Without any cuts we have 181018 entries. After using the following cut <math>EC_{tot}>0.2*p</math> we are getting 127719 entries, which is about 70.55% of 181018. <br>
+[[some things]]
-[[Image:Einner_over_P_using_tot_cut.gif]]<br>
- <math>EC_{inner}>0.08*p</math>
-[[Image:Etotal_over_P_using_inner_cut.gif]]<br>
-After the cut on the energy deposited into inner part of electron calorimeter, number of entries decreases by 22%.<br>
-[[Image:Einner_over_P_using_inner_cut.gif]]<br>
- Both cuts are applied<br>
-[[Image:Etotal_over_P_using_both_cuts.gif]]<br>
-In case of using the cuts of the total deposited energy and the enregy deposited into inner calorimeter number of entries decreases ~36% <br>
-[[Image:Einner_over_P_using_both_cuts.gif]]<br>