Difference between revisions of "Neutron TGEM Detector Abdel"

From New IAC Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 296: Line 296:
 
|}
 
|}
  
The experiment is done on the PC-board, it was heated for an hour under 298 oC.
+
The experiment is done on the PC-board, it was heated for an hour under 298°C.
 
The result is shown by the second photo, looks that PC-board should be replaced by another material that can hold this temeperature for longer time.
 
The result is shown by the second photo, looks that PC-board should be replaced by another material that can hold this temeperature for longer time.
  

Revision as of 18:08, 6 May 2009

Haithem's logbook for developing neutron sensitive TGEM detector


1/23/09

image

Generic SideView GEMDetector.jpg

1.) Search the web for patent which coats GEM detector with neutron sensitive materials. I think it is for Thermal neutrons.


Materials of high neutron capture cross section are studied widely, an example is the following patent [[1]]


Most of the high neutron capture cross section materials were measured for different neutron energies. A comprehensive work is published in 2000. The project was supported by Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute and Brookhaven National Laboratory [[2]]

U-235 is the one of the best choices since it has a high neutron fission cross section and a long half life compared to other the other isotopes that may come under choice.

A second choice is Th-238 and U-238 which have fission cross section less than that of U-235 but still good for our experiment.[[3]]



A boron coated GEM foil is being made by the company below http://n-cdt.com/

Another method uses BF3.

We are interested in a fissionable material coated onto the copper foils that is thin enough to allow the fission fragments to escape the foil and ionize the gas in the detector.


2.) Search for companies which use either sputtering or coating technology to apply the above material to caopper PCboards with hole int them such that the material does not fill up the hole. Hole diameter = ?

The material sputter onto the copper would have thickness on the order of Angstroms.

The TGEM PCboard would have a surface area of 10 cm x 10 cm.

3.) Current neutron efficiency plots for several detector

NeutronDetectionEfficiency-vs-Energy He3 Tube PND INL.jpg

Media:NeutronDetectionEfficiency-vs-Energy_Ne-213_BaF.pdf

NeutronDetectionEfficiency-vs-Energy BC-408 Scintillator.jpg

NeutronDetectionEfficiency-vs-Energy GEM BoronCoatedFoil Neutron Efficiency.jpg

1/30/09

1.) Investigate if Thorium Oxide will be a good candidate for the fission chamber. You would use electrolysis to coat a TGEM board.

Ways to make thorium fission chamber

2.) Find reference for THGEM9, this was used to determine optimal THGEM design 2 years ago

GEM-copper plate has dimensions of 3X3cm or 10X10cm with thinkness 5 micrometer copper layers.It has holes with diameter 60-80 micrometer.(From Operation of a triple GEM detector with CsI photocathode in pure BF4)

2/6/09

Thin deposition ThO2 molecular plating


http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6TJM-4S03R9J-C&_user=489297&_rdoc=1&_fmt=&_orig=search&_sort=d&view=c&_acct=C000023739&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=489297&md5=cd4314aa4ce529c19369900da39fbbe1

2/13/09

Check if the people below can deliver Th coated Al or Cu sheets , coating thickness smaller than 5 micron, the thinner the better. http://www-wnt.gsi.de/tasca/

2/20/09

2.5 x 2.5 cm thorium coated TGEM cards coated by ISU chemistry.

chemistry Department cant not do the sputtering for safety purposes, they like to avoid radiation contamination.

Need a mask for the predrilled TGEM cards to prevent Thorium from entering holes


Radioactive waste procedure if we are allowed to sputter in chemistry.


Write report describing the process we want to do.

ThoriumPlatingTGEMproposal

Radioactiving of Thorium may be a stumbling blog because of waste generated.

If we go for non-radioactive materials look up fission X-sect for Bismuth and Dysprosium

Fission cross section for Bi starts to be effective when the neutron energy is more than the range of interest.

Neutron induced fission cross section for Bi.jpg


Dy-isotopes are very good for absorbing neutrons in the range between 0.01- 10 MeV.

Dy neutron cross sections.jpg

Media:Zaidi_RadChem_vol93_2005.pdf

2/27/09

1.) Dysprosium (Dy) makes a lot of gammas and maybe 100 less alphas


2.) Don't give up trying to make thorium coated materials

try to send e-mail to one of these authors

N. Takahashi, Zeitschrift für Physik A Hadrons and Nuclei Volume 353, Number 1 / March, 1995

3.) Fission cross-section n,f for Tb

3/13/09

1.) look for a company that does resistive evaporative coatings

This company sells the machine http://www.lesker.com/newweb/Deposition_Sources/ThermalEvaporationSources_Resistive.cfm

2.)(n,f) X-sect for Dysprosium (Dy) ?


3.) Thorium and thorium oxide thin films (19 to 61 nm thick) were RF-sputtered onto mirrors. RF sputtering onto copper plates?


The neutron fission cross sections of 92235U and 92238U between 0.3 and 12.5 MeV W W Osterhage et al 1978 J. Phys. G: Nucl. Phys. 4 587-595

http://www.inf.uu.se/Reports/publications.html

Neutron-induced fission cross sections of natPb and 197Au in the 45-180 MeV region, V.P. Eismont, A.V. Prokofiev, A.N. Smirnov, S.M. Soloviev, H. Condé, K. Elmgren, N. Olsson and P.-U. Renberg Conference Proc. ADTTA99, 1999, (in press).

Up-to-date status and problems of the experimental nucleon-induced fission cross section data base at intermediate energies, V.P. Eismont, A.V. Prokofiev, A.N. Smirnov, I.V. Ryzhov, G.A. Tutin, H. Cond, K. Elmgren, N. Olsson and P.-U. Renberg, Proc. ADTTA99, 1999, (in press).

Neutron-induced fission cross section ratios of 209Bi and 238U at 75 and 96 MeV, V.P. Eismont, A.V. Kireev, I.V. Ryzhov, S.M. Soloviev, G.A. Tutin, H. Condé, K. Elmgren, N. Olsson and P.-U. Renberg, Proc. ADTTA99, 1999, (in press).

Neutron-induced fission fragment angular distribution of 238U at 96 MeV, V.P. Eismont, A.V. Kireev, I.V. Ryzhov, S.M. Soloviev, G.A. Tutin, H. Condé, K. Elmgren, N. Olsson and P.-U. Renberg Proc. ADTTA99, 1999, (in press).

Measurements of neutron-induced fission cross sections of heavy nuclei in the intermediate energy region, V.P. Eismont, A.V. Prokofyev, A.N. Smirnov, K. Elmgren, J. Blomgren, H. Condé, J. Nilsson, N. Olsson and E. Ramström, Accelerator-Driven Transmutation Technologies and Applications, Kalmar, ed. H. Condé (Uppsala: Uppsala University, 1997) p 606-612.

4/2/09

Summury of events through the last two weeks:

1- Looking for a neutron fission cross section for Dyspromium.

2- Looking for other possile elements that can be sued beside our choices for Thorium and Dysprosium.
    these elemets should   have a high neutron cross for fission (n,f),(n,gamma),(n,p) or (n,alpha). 
3- Using Neutrons cross sections (by D. Hughes and R. Schwartz, 2nd edition, 1957) as comphensive reference for our choice.
  

Comparison between Thorium and Dysprosium

.

Thorium: chacterized by relatively high neutron fission cross for both of its isotopes (Th-232 nad Th-230) compared to the stable elements but it is one of low fission cross sections compared to radioctive actinides. A lot of efforts are spent even in coating or finding the appropriate place or group to do that, since most of people are totally disencouraged to coat radioctive elements.

Table of different neutron fission cross 11MeV - 13 MeV.jpg Th-232 fission cross section.jpg


Dysprosium: radioactively stable,it has 5 isotopes Dy-160, 161, 162, 163 and 164. It is one of the best elements for detecting the neutrons because of high neutron capture cross section in the energy range of interest.

Total and capture neutron cross sections for dy- 160 until 20 mev.jpg Total and capture neutron cross sections for dy- 161 until 20 mev.jpgTotal and capture neutron cross sections for dy- 162 until 20 mev.jpg Total and capture neutron cross sections for dy- 163 until 20 mev.jpgTotal and capture neutron cross sections for dy- 164 until 20 mev.jpg

Also dysprosium pulls out alpha paticles (σ(n,α)= 3.6 mb at 14.2 MeV).

Other Possible Elements

. Generally,the highest values for neutron cross sections (σ(n,f), σ(n,p), σ(n,γ) and σ(n,α)) are for radioactive isotopes, which are not desirable for coating. Fortunately, there are non- radioactive elements have a relatively high neutron cross sections, for example:

σ(n,γ) at 0.025 MeV (in mb): Gd-158(710(70)), Sm-152 (670(100)), Br-81 (550(55)), Sm-154 (530(70)), Ce-142 (425(45)),

Hf-180(440(70)), Ru-96(320(60)), Ru-102 (390(40)), W-186 (300(40)), Zr-96 (240(40)), Hg-202(57(13))


σ(n,γ) at 1 MeV (in mb): Re-185(180), (390(40)), Ru-102 (30), Ru-104 (31), Hg-204(100), Br-81 (17)


σ(n,γ) at 14.5 MeV (in mb): Gd-160 (19(5)), Zr-96 (<4),

Element X-sect (mb)
Re-185 180
Ru-102 390

4/3/09

1.) Derive equations for voltages at each GEM stage and the net current for our voltage network and check them with measured values for the 4kV version of the voltage network.

2.) Reference [J.C. hadler, Radiation Measurements Vol 43 (2008) pf S334-S336] says

  1. R = 14 \mu m = mean range of fission fragment6s in U_3 O_8
  2. R= 12 um for UO_3
  3. 0.1 um thickness U( Th) will reduce mean length of fission tracks by 2%

3.) Plot N -vs- d using Equation 2 of Reference [J.C. hadler, Radiation Measurements Vol 43 (2008) pf S334 The number of particles per unit area is given by the equation:

 [math]N = 2/d *(1 - d/12.07) + 1/12.07 [/math]

d : the thickness in (um)

The range of the fragments in the emulsion is 12.07 um Fragment vs thickness (Hudler).jpg


4/17/09

A call conference with Dr.Wolfe, As result, the following is considered as next step for the project:

1- Check the melting temperature that a PC boeard can hold ( the size of the chamber can hold the 10 X 10 PC board ).
   
   The experiment is done, the temperature in average was aroubd 305oC, the PC board can hold that temperature easily, 

the PC board was just burned since the medium around is O2, but there is one thing I want ot be sure of, if the PC board has a very light layer of certain material covers its surface and can't hold up that temeperature?

  An experiment is done today (4/30/09) to check the PC board behavior at 350oC.
  A peace of copper sticked by normal used glue.

PC-board 1.jpg PC-board 2.jpg

   PC boeard can't hold up the temperature 350oC.

PC board 3.jpg PC board 4.jpg PC board 5.jpg PC board 6.jpg



2- Checking from a vender for chunk bulk ThF4 with size min. 30 cc.
3- Checking the thermal properties of ThF4 specially the melting point and if Thorium is adhere to copper in that temperature.
4- A mask should be prepared from stainless steal (Al is not preferable),inaddtion to thinking of drilling process and who     
    is going to do it.


Laser machining can cut 1" stainless steel sheets

5- Dr. Forest is going to send the email after collecting all the information needed to Dr. Wolfe.

Coaing process is going to be by electron beam, thorium should be heated to 1750 C. (the melting point for pure Th).


Until this point the uniformity of the surface is not an important factor, but I think it would be important whenever we start thinking of the track and the direction for Th fission fragments.

4/23/09

1- Check the melting temperature that a PC board can hold ( the size of the chamber can hold the 10 X 10 PC board ).

Basically FR-4, FR-1, CEM-1 or CEM-3 PCB are made of polytetrafluoroethylene which has (327 °C (620.6 °F))as a melting point.

The experiment is done, the temperature in average was around 305 °C, the PC board can hold that temperature easily,the PC board was just burned since the medium contains O2, but there is one thing I want to be sure of, if the PC board has a very light layer of certain material covers its surface?


2- Checking from a vender for chunk bulk ThF4 with size min. 30 cc.

http://www.element-collection.com/RGB_Elements_OCT04_rev05.pdf

 Element-collection sells thorium with 190$/gram !

3- Will Thorium adhere to copper

Thorium flouride is used for optical purposes, according the technical applications they have a number of recommendations related to sputtering by E-beam, and other materials that helps in thorium flouride adhesion.[4]

Looks there is a little change, Dr. Forest is going to check a vendor for U-238, which has a better fission cross section (3 times higher compared to Th-232),in addition to , the high price for Th-232 and risk of having flakes after sputtering, Throium by itself does not adhere with the surfaces unless other materials are used through the sputtering process (as methioned in the case of coating glass with thorium fluoride).

5/1/09

1.) Results from PCboard heating test: Board melts at 350 but not 310 degrees Celcius (Documents suggest 327 as the melting point.)

Before heating to 350[math]^o C[/math] After Heating to 350[math]^o C[/math]
PC-board 2.jpg PC board 6.jpg
Before heating to 298[math]^o C[/math] After Heating to 298 [math]^o C[/math]
PC board before 298.jpg PC-board at 298.jpg

The experiment is done on the PC-board, it was heated for an hour under 298°C. The result is shown by the second photo, looks that PC-board should be replaced by another material that can hold this temeperature for longer time.

2.) Oak Ridge will give us 1 kg of metal Th-232. We pay for shipping and we need to do rad licenses. Dr. Forest e-mail Dr. Brey and the paper work is beginning.

Contact info

Lloyd J. Jollay Manager Nuclear Technology and Nonproliferation Y-12 National Security Complex P.O. Box 2009 Oak Ridge, TN 37831-8112 Office: 865-241-1872 Fax: 865-574-5169 Pager: 865-873-9146 Mobile: 865-206-9663

3.) Laser cutting can do up to 1" thick stainless steel sheets, we can make a mask! Need to learn CAD to create a drawing of the mask which will be uploaded to the laser cutting machine. make tolerances around 500 micron (1/2 mm).

Insert picture of our GEM PC board with a table of distances.

4.) Meting Point for U-238 =?

Melting Point: 1408 K (1135°C or 2075°F). Boiling Point: 4404 K (4131°C or 7468°F)

5.) HV distribution chain calculation. Low voltage version?

Order resistors based on power calculation, work with Tumuna on the order

6.) Thickness measurements

7.) Install GEANT4 in your Inca account, Start GEANT4 Fission model (CHIPS or GEISHA).

References

Voss and 3 russian references for Dy(n,x) cross sections

Media:Shalem_MSthesis_march2005.pdf

http://arxiv.org/abs/0903.3819 Dy photon gammas spectrum


http://www.ippe.obninsk.ru/podr/cjd/kobra13.php?SubentID=30974002

http://www.americanelements.com/thoxst.html

http://arxiv.org/pdf/physics/0404119

NIM_A535_2004_93[5]


File:NIM A590 2008 pg134 Eberhardt.pdf Prep Targets

Neutron cross sections for different elements Media:Neutron_cross_sections.pdf

http://www-nds.iaea.org/RIPL-2/

Media:n gamma cross sections at 25 keV.jpg

Media:n alpha cross section at 14.2 MeV.jpg

Media:ne cross section at 14 MeV.jpg

Media:high enegy fission x-section.jpg

Media:N_gamma_x-section_at_400_keV.jpg

Media:x-sections of reactions at 14 MeV.jpg

Media:n p x-section at 14.3MeV.jpg

Media: n gamma x-section at 14.5 MeV.jpg

Media: elastic x-section at 0.5 MeV.jpg

Media: n gamma x-section at 1 MeV.jpg

Media: n 2n x-section at 14.3 MeV.jpg

Donald James Hughes, Neutron cross sections, 2nd edition 1958, u.s.a atomic energy commission.Media:Neutron cross sections.pdf

File:NSAE 151 2005 319-334 Y.D. Lee.pdf


12 Volt power supply system.

http://www.lnf.infn.it/esperimenti/imagem/doc/NIMA_46128.pdf

http://electrontube.com.Media: rp097mono HV divier.pdf

http://www.cerac.com/pubs/proddata/thf4.htm#anchor550078

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PC_board

Go Back TGEMS