Difference between revisions of "Theoretical analysis of 2n accidentals rates"
| Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
==Accidentals== | ==Accidentals== | ||
The probability of detecting two specific uncorrelated neutrons in a given pulse, denoted by <math>p(d_{n_1}d_{n_2})</math>, is independent of how many other neutrons are emitted in that same pulse. These two neutrons could be among, say, 8 other neutrons which were emitted in the same pulse, and <math>d_{n_1}d_{n_2}</math> would refer to the event that both (and only both) neutrons are detected. | The probability of detecting two specific uncorrelated neutrons in a given pulse, denoted by <math>p(d_{n_1}d_{n_2})</math>, is independent of how many other neutrons are emitted in that same pulse. These two neutrons could be among, say, 8 other neutrons which were emitted in the same pulse, and <math>d_{n_1}d_{n_2}</math> would refer to the event that both (and only both) neutrons are detected. | ||
| − | This is only an approximation, however, since each detector can register at most one hit per pulse, and so the effective efficiency of the entire array drops as the number of particles emitted increases. In other words, it is being assumed that neutrons do not "compete" against each other for a chance to be detected. | + | This is only an approximation, however, since each detector can register at most one hit per pulse, and so the effective efficiency of the entire array drops as the number of particles emitted increases. In other words, it is being assumed that neutrons do not "compete" against each other for a chance to be detected. This approximation is justified because each detector covers only 0.5% out of <math>4\pi</math> sr, and the rate of detected two-neutron coincidences per pulse is on the order of 10E-5, and no triple neutron events were recorded. |
I am making a point to address this because it accounts for the fact that the SP/DP accidental ratio is significantly greater than 1/2 for photons. | I am making a point to address this because it accounts for the fact that the SP/DP accidental ratio is significantly greater than 1/2 for photons. | ||
Revision as of 04:52, 22 January 2018
Introduction
A given photon pulse may cause multiple neutron-producing reactions, ranging from zero to "infinity" reactions. The number of neutron-producing reactions actually occurring in a given pulse is denoted by the random variable , and is assumed to follow the Poissonian distribution. Each neutron-producing interaction is said to produce correlated neutrons, where the random variable is the distribution of the number of neutrons produced in a single neutron-producing reaction. Each of the are independent and identically distributed random variables, so the purpose of the subscript is to distinguish between several distinct neutron-producing interactions which may occur in a single pulse.
The beam has a Bremsstrahlung end point of 10.5 MeV, which energetically allows for only two possible neutron-producing interactions, 1n-knochout and photofission. Thus, is equal to the photofission neutron multiplicity, plus a contribution at from 1n-knockout events. The analysis that follows does not need to distinguish between 1n-knockout events and photofission events that emit a single neutron, since in both cases, a single neutron is emitted that is uncorrelated with all other neutrons.
Variable reference
| variable | Description |
|---|---|
| A random variable for the number of neutron producing reactions occurring in a single pulse. | |
| A random variable for the number of correlated neutrons produced by a single neutron-producing reaction in a given pulse. | |
| A random variable with the same distribution as . The index only distinguishes between distinct and independent instances of . | |
| Poissonian mean for the number of neutron-producing interactions per pulse. |
Section Title
The rate of detected accidentals can be estimated from the two-neutron "coincidence" rate of different pulse (DP) events. Under suitable conditions, the rate of accidentals is very close to 1/2 of two-neutron rate in DP events.
During the derivation of this result, a pulse is considered in which there are neutron-producing interactions, where each individual reaction produces correlated neutrons, where ranges from 1 to . This event is denoted as, , and its probability by the expression, .
Accidentals
The probability of detecting two specific uncorrelated neutrons in a given pulse, denoted by , is independent of how many other neutrons are emitted in that same pulse. These two neutrons could be among, say, 8 other neutrons which were emitted in the same pulse, and would refer to the event that both (and only both) neutrons are detected. This is only an approximation, however, since each detector can register at most one hit per pulse, and so the effective efficiency of the entire array drops as the number of particles emitted increases. In other words, it is being assumed that neutrons do not "compete" against each other for a chance to be detected. This approximation is justified because each detector covers only 0.5% out of sr, and the rate of detected two-neutron coincidences per pulse is on the order of 10E-5, and no triple neutron events were recorded. I am making a point to address this because it accounts for the fact that the SP/DP accidental ratio is significantly greater than 1/2 for photons.