Difference between revisions of "DU data"

From New IAC Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
Current ~ 160 mA
 +
 +
Pulse width ~ 2 ns
 +
 +
Rep rate ~ 180 Hz
 +
 +
Electron energy ~ 25 MeV
 +
 +
Two thicknesses of Al brem radiator were used (A) 10 um for 10% of the beam time, (B) 25 um for 90% of the beam time.
 +
 
==Relative photon flux monitoring. Beam down. DU target==
 
==Relative photon flux monitoring. Beam down. DU target==
  

Revision as of 04:15, 9 June 2013

Current ~ 160 mA

Pulse width ~ 2 ns

Rep rate ~ 180 Hz

Electron energy ~ 25 MeV

Two thicknesses of Al brem radiator were used (A) 10 um for 10% of the beam time, (B) 25 um for 90% of the beam time.

Relative photon flux monitoring. Beam down. DU target

Flux DU r2461.png

Flux DU r2466.png

Flux DU r2475.png

Flux DU r2489.png

Flux DU r2498.png

Flux DU r2504.png

Flux DU r2507.png

Flux DU r2511.png

Flux DU r2519.png

Flux DU r2523.png

Flux DU r2524.png

Beam UP configuration

Cumulative raw ToF spectra obteined for the case of DU target and beam UP position are presented below:

DU raw cumul UP.png

The width of the photon peak (sigma) shows the IAC linac pulse width at it was mentioned above it was around 2 ns.

Neutron energy spectra reonstructed from the ToF spectra for the beam UP and DU are shown below:

DU nene cumul UP.png

The neutron detectors was placed azimuthally symmetric around the target so the distance was 135.5 cm from the center of the target to the face of each of the detector.

The uncertainty on the neutron energy depends mostly on the knowledge of the photon peak center position. The width of the photon peak gives an uncertainty in the neutron energy.

The energy uncertainty for the beam UP and DU target are shown below:

DU de nene cumul UP.png

Beam DOWN configuration

Cumulative raw ToF spectra obteined for the case of DU target and beam DOWN position are presented below:

DU raw cumul DOWN.png

The width of the photon peak (sigma) shows the IAC linac pulse width at it was mentioned above it was around 2 ns.

Neutron energy spectra reonstructed from the ToF spectra for the beam DOWN and DU are shown below:

DU nene cumul DOWN.png

The neutron detectors was placed azimuthally symmetric around the target so the distance was 135.5 cm from the center of the target to the face of each of the detector.

The uncertainty on the neutron energy depends mostly on the knowledge of the photon peak center position. The width of the photon peak gives an uncertainty in the neutron energy.

The energy uncertainty for the beam DOWN and DU target are shown below:

DU de nene cumul DOWN.png

Asymmetry. 4 channel binning of the neutron energy spectrum

DU 4ch asymm.png

Asymmetry. 8 channel binning of the neutron energy spectrum

DU 8ch asymm.png

Running asymmetry. High-to-low neutron energy binning

The asymmtry was measured starting with 8 MeV as a maximum bin number and then adding 1 MeV the asymmetry was measured for the whole neutron energy spectrum finally (point at zero MeV)

DU HtL RunAsymm.png