Emittance Test

From New IAC Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Design

Emittance Desien.png

New deisign: We changed to use just one magnet.


Emittance Desien new.png

File:Emittance Test Optim File.txt

HRRL had steer magnets on itself. We don't need external steer magnets. But Dr. Chouffani said that we might need them after quads, if the quads are not on axis. He will think about it.

Beam Line design on 27th, Jul. 2010:

Emittance Desien 27th Jul 2010.png

Optim File on 27th, Jul. 2010:

File:Emittance Test Optim File 27th Jul 2010.txt



File:HRRL Emittance.pdf

Faraday Cup

Farady Cap For HRRL Positorns 1.jpg Farady Cap For HRRL Positorns 2.jpg Farady Cap For HRRL Positorns 3.jpg Farady Cap For HRRL Positorns 4.jpg Farady Cap For HRRL Positorns 5.jpg Farady Cap For HRRL Positorns 6.jpg Farady Cap For HRRL Positorns 7.jpg Farady Cap For HRRL Positorns 8.jpg

Old Beam Line

HRRL Old BeamLine 1.jpg HRRL Old BeamLine 2.jpg HRRL Old BeamLine 3.jpg HRRL Old BeamLine 4.jpg HRRL Old BeamLine 5.jpg HRRL Old BeamLine 6.jpg

Beam Line Parts

Beam Line Parts HRRL Positorns 1.jpg Beam Line Parts HRRL Positorns 2.jpg Beam Line Parts HRRL Positorns 3.jpg Beam Line Parts HRRL Positorns 4.jpg Beam Line Parts HRRL Positorns 5.jpg Beam Line Parts HRRL Positorns 6.jpg Beam Line Parts HRRL Positorns 7.jpg Beam Line Parts HRRL Positorns 8.jpg Beam Line Parts HRRL Positorns 9.jpg Beam Line Parts HRRL Positorns 10.jpg Beam Line Parts HRRL Positorns 11.jpg Beam Line Parts HRRL Positorns 12.jpg

Constructed Beam Line for Emittance Test

Vacuum pressure on the beam line is less than [math] 10^{-8} [/math] torr (on 2010-July-7th).

Constructed Beam Line for Emittance Test 1.jpg Constructed Beam Line for Emittance Test 2.jpg Constructed Beam Line for Emittance Test 3.jpg

Leveling Survey

Downstream of the beam up by 2.6 mm.

Constructed Beam Line for Emittance Test Leveling Survey.jpg



How to do Leveling Survey and Alignment with Theodolite on e- Beam Line

A. Leveling Beam Pipe

1. Put the theodolite as high as the center of the beam line at upstream. Turn theodolite up and down. If the up angle is equal to down angle from the center of the pipe, theodolite is exactly as high as beam pipe. If not, adjust theodolite, until up and down angles are equal.

2. Once first step finished, then rotate theodolite horizontally to down stream. Turn it up and down, if up and down angles are not equal, adjust the stand till they are equal.


B. How to Make Sure the Quad is Perpendicular to the Beam Line

If the distances between quads and end of cavity at any given points are equal, then quad and end of cavity are parallel. Pipe is perpendicular to the end of the cavity, thus, magnet would also be perpendicular to the pipe.

I will find at lest three random points quads and three corresponding points at the end of the cavity, make sure they are equal, then I can say, magnet is perpendicular to the beam line.

I am planning to stick a metal ruler two, so two faces are parallel.


C. Centering the Quad Magnet with Theodolite

Vertical Centering

1. Finish the step 1 in A.

2. Then turn up the theodolite from the upper edge of the pipe to the magnet hole, call this angle upper angle. Do the same at lower part, call it lower angle. If the this two angles are not equal adjust the stand till they are equal.


Horizantal Centering

We know the diameter of the pipe [math] d_p [/math]. So, we can calculate from the pipe to the edge of the quad as:

Calculate from the Pipe to the edge of the Quad.jpg

We need to make sure this distance is same when measure it horizontally, so that our quad is centered on the pipe. I am going to use a ruler to ...(thinking)


July 2010 Run

Initial Accelerator Settings

E = 10 MeV [math]\Rightarrow[/math] Control Voltage= 4.09 V

Pulse Width <= 50 ns

Average Beam Current = least amount needed to light up YaG crystal, start at 1 mA and Rep rate of 100 Hz.

At the same time we want to do radiation test on HRRL. This is for predicting the radiation after shifting cavity to new position. Radiation test run plan is at: [1]

7/26/10

Alignment check

1.) Survey the Quad to be sure it is centered on the beam pipe

2.) survey the flag to determine if target is centered on the beam pipe

Transmission tuning

1.) Using the quads and accelerator coils, focus the beam on the YaG crystal to as fine a spot as possible. Monitor the FC during the focusing.

changed control Voltage from

Control Voltage= 4.9 V [math]\Rightarrow[/math] E = 16 MeV

to


4.09 V [math]\Rightarrow[/math] E = 10 MeV


Tune the 4 accelerator coils for max transmission.

We want to maximize the current reach the Farady Cup. This can be determined by the ratio on Channels of FC and Gun Current.

Gun current is the current on the pick up coil, which is input current for cavity. Current on Farady cup is the current reach the end of the beam line (FC is at the end of the beam line). We want to maximize the the ratio of Farady cup current to Gun current (FCC/GC), so there are more electrons will make it to the target. Thus, we enlarge our positron yield.

Basic principle: Fix three coils, change one till it maximized.


Coil 1 upstream left/right (mA) Coil 2 upstream UP/down (mA) Coil 3 downstream up/down Coil 4 downstream left right Scope Picture Gun Current FC current Transmission [math]\equiv[/math] Gun / FC
10 Run1 2-26-10.png 15 +/- 0.65 nV s -5.4[math]\pm[/math]1.8 nV s 36 [math]\pm[/math] 12 %


The HRRL went down after 2 hours of operation.

7/27/10

No HRRL beam time today. Chad tested the Thermatron module and believes it is not the problem. Chad will continue debugging tomorrow.


Filament

HRRL Emitt Test Filament On Without Light.jpg HRRL Emitt Test Filament On Yag 1.jpg HRRL Emitt Test Filament On Yag 2.jpg HRRL Emitt Test Filament On Yag 3.jpg HRRL Emitt Test Filament On Yag 4.jpg HRRL Emitt Test Filament On Yag 5.jpg HRRL Emitt Test Filament On Yag 6.jpg

BMP format:

Wiki won't allow me to upload with bmp extension. So, I used png extension to upload. After download files, you will find they are still with bmp extension.

HRRL Emitt Test Filament On Yag Without Light.png HRRL Emitt Test Filament On Yag With Light 1.png HRRL Emitt Test Filament On Yag With Light 2.png HRRL Emitt Test Filament On Yag With Light 3.png HRRL Emitt Test Filament On Yag With Light 4.png HRRL Emitt Test Filament On Yag With Light 5.png

7/28/10

The HRRL came back around 3pm today. A capacitor in the bank was found to be the problem.


Maximize Transmission

Maximized setup according to the accelerator operator.

Beam Energy: 16 MeV

Rep Rate: 95 Hz

Pulse Width: 100 ns

Coil 1 upstream left/right (A) Coil 2 upstream UP/down (A) Coil 3 downstream up/down (A) Coil 4 downstream left right (A) Scope Picture Gun Current FC current Ratio Spot Size
0.1 0.5 3.1 0.7 HRRL Emit Test Run1 7-28-10Spot Size.jpg


Reversed the polarities on coil # 3 and coil # 4. Rep rate: 3Hz

Coil 1 upstream left/right (A) Coil 2 upstream UP/down (A) Coil 3 downstream up/down (A) Coil 4 downstream left right (A) Scope Picture Gun Current FC current Ratio Spot Size
1.2 1.2 0.0 3 HRRL Emit Test Run1 7-28-10Spot Size2.jpg


After image manipulation in GIMP to remove spot from the filament, Arne obtained reasonable projections for horizontal and vertical beam sizes ( < 2 mm). The quad was off, low rep rate to avoid saturation, 10MeV. This was the spot for the initial setup on Wednesday. Image fit snapshot 20100728 1720.jpg


Electron beam deflection due to Earth's B-field.

It appears the the image from electrons hitting the YaG crystal is offset (to the right) compare to the image from the filament which appears near the center of the cross hairs.

Is the earths Magnetic field causing the electrons to move this far beam right?

[math]B_{Earth}[/math] = 0.00005 Tesla ( [math]\frac{ \mbox{kg}}{\mbox{C}\cdot \mbox{s}}[/math]) = 0.5 Gauss

E_{electron} = 10 MeV = Pc [math]\Rightarrow[/math] P = 10 MeV/c

Estimation using Classical Lorentz Force (forget about angle of B and V)

[math]\vec{F} = q \vec{v} \times \vec{B}[/math]

assuming [math]v[/math] and [math]B[/math] are orthogonal then we get the cyclotron radius


[math]F= qvB = m\frac{v^2}{r} \Rightarrow r = \frac{qB}{mv}[/math]

[math]r = \frac{(1.6 \times 10^{-19} \mbox{C}) \times ( 5 \times 10^{-5}\frac{\mbox{kg}}{\mbox{C} \cdot \mbox{s}})}{mv}[/math]

[math]mv = P = 10 \frac{ \mbox{MeV}}{\mbox{c}} = 5.6 \times 10^{-21} \frac{\mbox{kg} \cdot \mbox{m} }{\mbox{s}} [/math]


[math]\Rightarrow r = 700 \mbox{m}[/math]


Now some Geometry.

Assuming the orbit is a circle with a 700 m radius, then the question becomes how far does the electron move to maintain the orbit if it travels 1 m in a straight line.

let

[math]r[/math]= radius of circle

[math]l[/math]= distance along the beam line

[math]d[/math] = deflection due to gravity

Note
[math]l[/math] is a tangent to the orbit

one can construct a right angle triangle with side of length d, the [math]l[/math] as the base and [math]r+d[/math] as the hypotenuse.

Then Pythagorean's theorem gives

[math]r^2 + l^2 = (r+d)^2[/math]

Giving

[math]d^2+ (2r)d +l^2 =0[/math]

using quadratic formula you get

[math]2d = -(2r)/2 \pm \sqrt{(2r)^2 + 4\frac{l^2}{r^2}}/2[/math]


since l/r is very small (1/700) we can approximate this as

[math]d = -r \pm r \sqrt{1+ \frac{l^2}{r^2}} \approx \frac{l^2}{r} = \frac{l^2}\frac{P}{qB}= \frac{qBl^2}{P}[/math]

for 10 MeV and a 1 m long beam pipe

[math]d = (l\mbox {m})^2 \frac{(1.6 \times 10^{-19} \mbox{C}) \times ( 5 \times 10^{-5}\frac{\mbox{kg}}{\mbox{C} \cdot \mbox{s}})}{ 5.6 \times 10^{-21} \frac{\mbox{kg} \cdot \mbox{m} }{\mbox{s}} } = l^2 \times 1.42 \mbox{mm}[/math] where [math]l[/math] is in units of m

Radiation Footprint Measurements

Spent the remaining beam time doing radiation footprint measurements.

HRRL_radiation_tests#Run_Plan

7/29/10

Today we first tune up the beam for max transmission.

If the above calculation is correct we can expect the electron beam to move at least 2 mm away from the center of the FC. We could test it the Earth's B-field is the cause of the deflection by watch the deflection as a function of the beam energy. If we had enough [math]\mu[/math]-metal we could wrap the beam pipe in it and see if the deflection goes away.

Quad Scan

First Scan

HRRL Emit test Quad Scan First beam current.png HRRL Emit test Quad Scan First current pulse width fwhm.png

HRRL Emit test Quad Scan First 0Amp.jpg HRRL Emit test Quad Scan First 1Amp.jpg HRRL Emit test Quad Scan First 2Amp.jpg HRRL Emit test Quad Scan First 3Amp.jpg HRRL Emit test Quad Scan First 4Amp.jpg HRRL Emit test Quad Scan First 5Amp.jpg HRRL Emit test Quad Scan First 6Amp.jpg HRRL Emit test Quad Scan First 7Amp.jpg HRRL Emit test Quad Scan First 8Amp.jpg HRRL Emit test Quad Scan First 9Amp.jpg HRRL Emit test Quad Scan First 10Amp.jpg HRRL Emit test Quad Scan First 0Amp.jpg HRRL Emit test Quad Scan First 11Amp.jpg HRRL Emit test Quad Scan First 12Amp.jpg HRRL Emit test Quad Scan First 13Amp.jpg HRRL Emit test Quad Scan First 14Amp.jpg HRRL Emit test Quad Scan First 15Amp.jpg HRRL Emit test Quad Scan First 16Amp.jpg HRRL Emit test Quad Scan First 17Amp.jpg HRRL Emit test Quad Scan First 18Amp.jpg HRRL Emit test Quad Scan First 19Amp.jpg HRRL Emit test Quad Scan First 20Amp.jpg

Second Scan (Polarity Changed)

HRRL Emit test Quad Scan First beam current.png

HRRL Emit test Quad Scan First current pulse width fwhm.png

HRRL Emit test Quad Scan Second 0Amp.jpg HRRL Emit test Quad Scan Second 1Amp.jpg HRRL Emit test Quad Scan Second 2Amp.jpg HRRL Emit test Quad Scan Second 3Amp.jpg HRRL Emit test Quad Scan Second 4Amp.jpg HRRL Emit test Quad Scan Second 5Amp.jpg HRRL Emit test Quad Scan Second 6Amp.jpg HRRL Emit test Quad Scan Second 7Amp.jpg HRRL Emit test Quad Scan Second 8Amp.jpg HRRL Emit test Quad Scan Second 9Amp.jpg HRRL Emit test Quad Scan Second 10Amp.jpg HRRL Emit test Quad Scan Second 0Amp.jpg HRRL Emit test Quad Scan Second 11Amp.jpg HRRL Emit test Quad Scan Second 12Amp.jpg HRRL Emit test Quad Scan Second 13Amp.jpg HRRL Emit test Quad Scan Second 14Amp.jpg HRRL Emit test Quad Scan Second 15Amp.jpg HRRL Emit test Quad Scan Second 16Amp.jpg HRRL Emit test Quad Scan Second 17Amp.jpg HRRL Emit test Quad Scan Second 18Amp.jpg HRRL Emit test Quad Scan Second 19Amp.jpg HRRL Emit test Quad Scan Second 20Amp.jpg

Radiation Footprint Measurements

spent noon to 3pm on radiation measurements below

HRRL_radiation_tests#29_Jul_2010

Earth's B-field effect

It the above calculation on the effects of the Earth's Magnetic field on a the electron beam is correct then we should see the amount of deflection depend inversely on the electron's momentum (1/P).

So lets take a few pictures at the energy exterma to see how far the electron spot moves away from the filament image on the crystal.

Maximize Transmission

Change the linac coils to determine a setting which delivers the maximum current to the FC and has a reasonable spot size on the YaG viewer.


Coil 1 upstream left/right (A) Coil 2 upstream UP/down (A) Coil 3 downstream up/down Coil 4 downstream left right Scope Picture Gun Current FC current Ratio YaG Image
0 0.6 1.8 2.7


Coil 1 upstream left/right (A) Coil 2 upstream UP/down (A) Coil 3 downstream up/down Coil 4 downstream left right Scope Picture Gun Current FC current Ratio YaG Image
0 0.6 1.8 2.7 100px 100px



a.) Does a small beam spot size on the crystal give maximum FC signal?

b.) Is there a point where the spot size changes and you can't resolve a change in the FC output?

c.) Remove the YaG target and determine if above observations are unchanged.

Pickup Coil Calibration

2.) After tuning the beam to deliver the Maximum beam current to the FC, measure the FC and green pickup coil output as a function of current by integrating the pulse with an oscilloscope.

FC output Green Pickup Coil output
(mA) (mA)
10
20
30
40
50
60
70

a.) does the FC output change with rep rate? It should not but maybe there is loss at high rates?

Quad scan

Tune the beam so a change in the quad B-field does not cause a deflection.

First attempt to measure the spot size change as a function of Quad current

Quad Current Beam Spot RMS (0 degrees= Left/right) Beam Spot RMS (90 degrees= Up/Down)
(Amps) (mm) (mm)


Shall we do both polarities?

Imaging

Background subtraction

The filament produces at least a 2 mm diameter spot on the YaG crystal. Beam dominates the image.

7/30/10

Open day to finish leftover tasks

HRRL_radiation_tests#Run_Plan


Consider emittance measurements at different energies.

Imaging scratch area

After image manipulation in GIMP to remove spot from filament. Obtained reasonable projections for horizontal and vertical beam sizes. The quad was off, low rep rate to avoid saturation, 10MeV. This was the spot for the initial setup on Wednesday. Image fit snapshot 20100728 1720.jpg

Go back Positrons

Retrieved from "https://wiki.iac.isu.edu/index.php?title=Emittance_Test&oldid=52062"