Difference between revisions of "Progress reports"
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
| − | 2.) The | + | 2.) The Max deflections decreases from 13 mm to less than 1 mm if carbon fiber rods are place along the front edge of the endplates. The back plate hinges are both fixed. |
| − | 3.) A max deflection of 22 microns is predicted from our current ANSYS model when both carbon fiber rods and a hexcell backing sheet are used. Only the left hinge is constrained. No gravity and no differential gas pressure. Effective Youngs modulus is used. The carbon fiber rods and the hexcell backing sheet are the only materials not made from the poly foam composite. Poly foam used on endplates, back plate, and nose plate. No Al frame around endplate. | + | |
| + | [[Image:Deflection_Rod_NoHexel_2fixedMounts.avi]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | 3.) The image below shows a max end plate deflection of 0.3 mm when hexcell backing sheet is used and No carbon fiber rods. | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[Image:Deflection_Hexel_2fixedMounts.jpg]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | 4.) A max deflection of 22 microns is predicted from our current ANSYS model when both carbon fiber rods and a hexcell backing sheet are used. Only the left hinge is constrained. No gravity and no differential gas pressure. Effective Youngs modulus is used. The carbon fiber rods and the hexcell backing sheet are the only materials not made from the poly foam composite. Poly foam used on endplates, back plate, and nose plate. No Al frame around endplate. | ||
[[Image:R3_3D_AnsysModel_Deflection_3-12-08.png | 200 px]] | [[Image:R3_3D_AnsysModel_Deflection_3-12-08.png | 200 px]] | ||
Revision as of 20:19, 14 March 2008
R3 design Progress report
3/11/08
Progress modeling the R3 drift chamber has been held back by both software and hardware problems. This past week we installed ANSYS on a faster computer ( 2 GHz Intel with 3Meg RAM) and were able to render the design in 30 minutes instead of 2 hours. The turnaround for debugging the geometrical design is now faster and ANSY does not currently crash. We plan on doing the same test using a new computer (2 GHz Intel with 8 Meg RAM) once it has been assembled (2 weeks or less).
The image below represent the current Model which has been implemented in ANSYS.
3/18/08
1.) Movies showing deflections as a function of applying the max load and then releasing it. The max deflection is about 13 mm. The two movies below show the two endplate deflections with no rods for either 1 fixed or 2 fixed mount points.
This movie shows the endplate deflection as the wire load is applied and then released. The top two mounting brackets on the back plate are fixed.
File:Deflection NoRod NoHexel 2fixedMounts.avi
The movie below is under similar conditions except the right bracket is allowed to move.
File:Deflection NoRod NoHexel 1fixedMounts.avi
2.) The Max deflections decreases from 13 mm to less than 1 mm if carbon fiber rods are place along the front edge of the endplates. The back plate hinges are both fixed.
File:Deflection Rod NoHexel 2fixedMounts.avi
3.) The image below shows a max end plate deflection of 0.3 mm when hexcell backing sheet is used and No carbon fiber rods.
4.) A max deflection of 22 microns is predicted from our current ANSYS model when both carbon fiber rods and a hexcell backing sheet are used. Only the left hinge is constrained. No gravity and no differential gas pressure. Effective Youngs modulus is used. The carbon fiber rods and the hexcell backing sheet are the only materials not made from the poly foam composite. Poly foam used on endplates, back plate, and nose plate. No Al frame around endplate.
