Difference between revisions of "Comparing With Whitney Rates"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search




| Line 111: | Line 111: | ||
<center><math>N_{Moller} =R_{Moller}\cdot t_{simulated}=\frac{9.97\times 10^{9}Moller}{s} \cdot 9.54\times 10^{-5} s=951138\ Moller</math></center> | <center><math>N_{Moller} =R_{Moller}\cdot t_{simulated}=\frac{9.97\times 10^{9}Moller}{s} \cdot 9.54\times 10^{-5} s=951138\ Moller</math></center> | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
Revision as of 15:39, 14 March 2018
Using the values from Whitney:

For a 5cm target of LH2:
Using the beam current of 100nA,
Given the beam Luminosity of:
We can check to make sure the density makes sense
Using the values from Whitney :
https://wiki.iac.isu.edu/index.php/CLAS12_RateEst_byWA
| Energy | 6 GeV | 11 GeV |
| Process | (nb) | (nb) |
| Moller | 22773001 | 75008636 |
| DIS + radiative tail | 128 | 83 |
| Elastic e-p | 5511220 | 3670740 |
| Elastic radiative tail | 24705 | 12944 |
| π0 electro-production | 14802 | 17908 |
| π0 photo-production | 569 | 852 |
| π+ electro-production | 4032 | 5536 |
| π+ photo-production | 282 | 487 |
| π− electro-production | 2806 | 3843 |
| π− photo-production | 199 | 342 |
| Total | 2.83317E7 | 7.87214E7 |



Similarly,