Difference between revisions of "QADC spectrum"
Line 51: | Line 51: | ||
|voltage (kV) || channel number for three runs|| charge calibration factor || Charge (nC) || Average Charge from the figure (nC) | |voltage (kV) || channel number for three runs|| charge calibration factor || Charge (nC) || Average Charge from the figure (nC) | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | 2.75 || 1143+_3 ,1274+_3 , 1026+_3 || 0.0393 || 45. | + | | 2.75 || 1143+_3 ,1274+_3 , 1026+_3 || 0.0393 || 45.11 || 50 |
|- | |- | ||
− | | 2. | + | | 2.80 || 1078+_2, 1015+_2, 1110+_1 || 0.051 || 54.45 || 50 |
|} | |} | ||
Revision as of 01:10, 5 November 2013
QDC Analysis
The first test for the detector signal after installing U-233 is by using CAEN V792 Q-ADC (Analog charge to digital converter). The aim of this test is to test the shutter ability to help in distinguishing the emitted particles from U-233 source based on liberated charge from their ionization in gas.
A Non-linear increase in the charge collected by the Q-ADC as the voltage increases for GEM HV-circuit, also the figures show the change in the charge spectrum as the shutter position changed, shutter open's charge spectra show more collected charge than that of shutter close.
|
First Peak in Shutter open spect
voltage (kV) | channel number for three runs | charge calibration factor | Charge (nC) | Average Charge from the figure (nC) |
2.75 | 1143+_3 ,1274+_3 , 1026+_3 | 0.0393 | 45.11 | 50 |
2.80 | 1078+_2, 1015+_2, 1110+_1 | 0.051 | 54.45 | 50 |
The table above shows a comparison between the averaging 3 charge spectra to find the channel number for the first peak as the shutter is open (last column), and a gaussian fitting for each peak for each run separately to find the average, then calculating the average for the three peaks' channel number (column 3). The comparison shows that the first peak is still considered saturated.
GO BACK [1]