Difference between revisions of "QADC spectrum"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 49: | Line 49: | ||
{| border="1" cellpadding="4" | {| border="1" cellpadding="4" | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | |voltage (kV) || channel number || Charge (nC) || Average Charge from the figure (nC) | + | |voltage (kV) || channel number for three runs|| charge calibration factor || Charge (nC) || Average Charge from the figure (nC) |
|- | |- | ||
− | | 2.75 || 1143+_3 ,1274+_3 , 1026+_3 | + | | 2.75 || 1143+_3 ,1274+_3 , 1026+_3 || 0.0393 || 45.1 || 50 |
|- | |- | ||
− | | 2.8 || 1078+_2, 1015+_2, 1110+_1 | + | | 2.8 || 1078+_2, 1015+_2, 1110+_1 || 0.051 || 54.5 || 50 |
Revision as of 01:01, 5 November 2013
QDC Analysis
The first test for the detector signal after installing U-233 is by using CAEN V792 Q-ADC (Analog charge to digital converter). The aim of this test is to test the shutter ability to help in distinguishing the emitted particles from U-233 source based on liberated charge from their ionization in gas.
A Non-linear increase in the charge collected by the Q-ADC as the voltage increases for GEM HV-circuit, also the figures show the change in the charge spectrum as the shutter position changed, shutter open's charge spectra show more collected charge than that of shutter close.
|
First Peak in Shutter open spect
voltage (kV) | channel number for three runs | charge calibration factor | Charge (nC) | Average Charge from the figure (nC) |
2.75 | 1143+_3 ,1274+_3 , 1026+_3 | 0.0393 | 45.1 | 50 |
2.8 | 1078+_2, 1015+_2, 1110+_1 | 0.051 | 54.5 | 50
|
GO BACK [1]