Difference between revisions of "Comparison of GEANT Simulation to Whitney Data"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
| Total Moller event rate per barn (<math>b^{-1}</math>)|| 1.68E6 || 1.68E6 || 1.26E6 ||1.27E7 || 1.27E7 | | Total Moller event rate per barn (<math>b^{-1}</math>)|| 1.68E6 || 1.68E6 || 1.26E6 ||1.27E7 || 1.27E7 | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | Detector Event Cross-Section (b) || | + | | Detector Event Cross-Section (b) || 0.18 || 0.18|| 0.18 || || |
|- | |- | ||
− | | Detector Moller Cross-Section (b) || ||0.17 || || || | + | | Detector Moller Cross-Section (b) ||0.17 ||0.17 ||0.17 || || |
|- | |- | ||
− | | Detector Individual Moller Cross-Section (b) || | + | | Detector Individual Moller Cross-Section (b) || 5.86E-7 || 5.86E-8 || 7.81E-7|| || |
|- | |- | ||
− | | Detector Moller event rate per barn (<math>b^{-1}</math>)|| | + | | Detector Moller event rate per barn (<math>b^{-1}</math>)|| 1.71E6 || 1.71E7|| 1.28E6|| || |
|} | |} | ||
Revision as of 18:50, 29 March 2018
Simulation | GEANT4(1cm target) | GEANT4(1cm target) | GEANT4(5cm target) | GEANT4(5cm target) | Whitney |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Length of Target (cm) | 1 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
4E7 | 4E8 | 6E6 | 6E7 | 6E7 | |
1026940 | 10270829 | 771161 | 4826141 | 1001700 | |
305570 | 3054080 | 229266 | |||
975593 | 9757288 | 732603 | 4584834 | 951138 | |
290291 | 2901376 | 217803 | 1362098 | ||
(s) | 1.3E-5 | 1.3E-4 | 9.57E-6 | 9.62E-5 | 9.54E-5 |
Total Event Cross-Section (b) | 0.61 | 0.61 | 0.61 | 0.38 | 0.079 |
Total Moller Cross-Section (b) | 0.58 | 0.58 | 0.58 | 0.361 | 0.075 |
Total Individual Moller Cross-Section (b) | 5.95E-7 | 5.94E-8 | 7.92E-7 | 7.87E-8 | 7.88E-8 |
Total Moller event rate per barn ( | )1.68E6 | 1.68E6 | 1.26E6 | 1.27E7 | 1.27E7 |
Detector Event Cross-Section (b) | 0.18 | 0.18 | 0.18 | ||
Detector Moller Cross-Section (b) | 0.17 | 0.17 | 0.17 | ||
Detector Individual Moller Cross-Section (b) | 5.86E-7 | 5.86E-8 | 7.81E-7 | ||
Detector Moller event rate per barn ( | )1.71E6 | 1.71E7 | 1.28E6 |
Total dectector events occur for about 2.5% of the incident electrons on a LH2 target. We can assume that the Moller rate is 95% of the total event rate. We can assume the number of Moller events that occur within the DC range to be around 30% of the total Moller events occuring for the number of incident electrons for LH2 as well. Since the differential cross-section over the angel theta is proportional to the differtial cross-section over wire number we can dividing the Moller differential cross-section by the product of the density and length of the target material
If we were to integrate the Moller Differential Cross Section