Difference between revisions of "2NCorr Photon flux estimate"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | =Overview= | |
| − | The measured neutron rate from D2O depends on the following | + | An estimated lower bound for the photon flux throughout the experiment can be calculated from the data of a D2O target. |
| + | The measured neutron rate from D2O depends on the following: the (G,n) cross-section as a function of energy, the energy distribution of the brem photons, target geometry, detector efficiency, and photon flux. The (G,n) cross-sections are known and the brem energy distribution can be taken from an MCNP simulation. The only remaining unknown variables are photon flux and detector efficiency. By setting detector efficiency to 100%, and considering only geometric effects (i.e. solid angle), a lower bound can be placed on the photon flux incident on the targets. | ||
neutron rate <math>= N_{\gamma}*\int_0^{10.5}\! \epsilon(E)*P(n_0|E)*P(E)\,dE</math> | neutron rate <math>= N_{\gamma}*\int_0^{10.5}\! \epsilon(E)*P(n_0|E)*P(E)\,dE</math> | ||
Revision as of 04:34, 4 January 2018
Overview
An estimated lower bound for the photon flux throughout the experiment can be calculated from the data of a D2O target. The measured neutron rate from D2O depends on the following: the (G,n) cross-section as a function of energy, the energy distribution of the brem photons, target geometry, detector efficiency, and photon flux. The (G,n) cross-sections are known and the brem energy distribution can be taken from an MCNP simulation. The only remaining unknown variables are photon flux and detector efficiency. By setting detector efficiency to 100%, and considering only geometric effects (i.e. solid angle), a lower bound can be placed on the photon flux incident on the targets.
neutron rate