Neutron Polarimeter: Difference between revisions

From New IAC Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Shaproma (talk | contribs)
Shaproma (talk | contribs)
 
(9 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
[http://wiki.iac.isu.edu/index.php/PhotoFission_with_Polarized_Photons_from_HRRL Go Back]
[https://wiki.iac.isu.edu/index.php/Roman_calculation Go Back]




= Four-vector Algebra =
= Four-vector Algebra =


Consider two bode reaction <math>D(\gamma, n)p</math>:
Consider two body reaction <math>D(\gamma, n)p</math>:


[[File:Collision01.png | 450 px]]
[[File:Collision01.png | 450 px]]
Line 116: Line 116:
And in the plot below I have overlay my error calculations using the formulas above:
And in the plot below I have overlay my error calculations using the formulas above:


[[File:Tgamma_1ns.png | 1000 px]]
[[File:Tgamma_1ns_01.png | 900 px]]




Line 126: Line 126:
[[File:table_3ns.png | 800 px]]
[[File:table_3ns.png | 800 px]]


[[File:Tgamma_3ns.png | 1000 px]]
[[File:Tgamma_3ns_01.png | 900 px]]


=<math>\Theta</math>  dependence=
=<math>\Theta</math>  dependence=
Line 149: Line 149:




Let's do some plots using the equation derived above. Below is presented the photon energy as function of neutron angle for several values of neutron energy:
[[File:Tgamma_angle.png | 900 px]]
And below are the photon energy as function of neutron angle and neutron energy:
[[File:Tgamma_3D_01.png | 900 px]]






[http://wiki.iac.isu.edu/index.php/PhotoFission_with_Polarized_Photons_from_HRRL Go Back]
[http://wiki.iac.isu.edu/index.php/PhotoFission_with_Polarized_Photons_from_HRRL Go Back]

Latest revision as of 05:17, 27 February 2013

Go Back


Four-vector Algebra

Consider two body reaction [math]\displaystyle{ D(\gamma, n)p }[/math]:


Write down four-momentum vectors before and after reaction:

[math]\displaystyle{  p_{\gamma} = \left( T_{\gamma},\ T_{\gamma},\ 0,\ 0  \right)  }[/math] 
[math]\displaystyle{  p_D     = \left( m_D,\ 0,\ 0,\ 0  \right)  }[/math] 
[math]\displaystyle{  p_{n} = \left( E_n,\ \ p_n\cos \Theta_n,\ \ p_n\sin \Theta_n,\ \ 0  \right)  }[/math] 
[math]\displaystyle{  p_{p} = \left( E_p,\ \ p_p\cos \Theta_p,\ \ p_p\sin \Theta_p,\ \ 0  \right)  }[/math] 

Now apply the law of conservation of four-momentum vectors:

[math]\displaystyle{  p^{\mu}_{\gamma} + p^{\mu}_D = p^{\mu}_p + p^{\mu}_n\ \ \Rightarrow \ \  p^{\mu}_p = p^{\mu}_{\gamma} + p^{\mu}_D - p^{\mu}_n }[/math]

Squaring both side of equation above and using the four-momentum invariants [math]\displaystyle{ (p^{\mu})^2 = m^2 }[/math] we have:

[math]\displaystyle{  m_p^2 = m_D^2 + m_n^2 +  2T_{\gamma}\cdot m_D  - 2m_D\cdot E_n - 2\left( T_{\gamma}E_n - T_{\gamma}p_n\cos\Theta_n\right)  }[/math]

Detector located at [math]\displaystyle{ \Theta = 90^o }[/math] case

Detector is located at [math]\displaystyle{ \Theta_n = 90^o }[/math], and the formula above is simplified:

[math]\displaystyle{  m_p^2 = m_D^2 + m_n^2 +  2\ T_{\gamma}\cdot m_D  - 2\ m_D\cdot E_n - 2\ T_{\gamma}E_n  }[/math]


We can easily solve the equation above with respect to incident photon energy:

[math]\displaystyle{ T_{\gamma} = \frac {m_p^2 - m_n^2 - m_D^2 + 2\ m_D E_n}{2\ (m_D - E_n)}
                  = \frac {m_p^2 - m_n^2 - m_D^2 + 2\ m_D (T_n+m_n)}{2\ (m_D - (T_n+m_n))}  }[/math]


For non-relativistic neutrons [math]\displaystyle{ T_n \ll m_n = 939.5\ MeV }[/math] and the formula above is become:

[math]\displaystyle{ T_{\gamma} = \frac {m_p^2 - m_n^2 - m_D^2 + 2\ m_D m_n + 2\ m_D T_n}{2\ (m_D - m_n)}  }[/math]


Substituting the corresponding masses, we get finally:

[math]\displaystyle{ T_{\gamma}\ [MeV] = 2.003\ T_n\ [MeV] + 1.715\ [MeV]\ \ \ \ [1] }[/math]

and visa versa:

[math]\displaystyle{ T_n\ [MeV] = 0.499\cdot T_{\gamma}\ [MeV] - 0.856\ [MeV]\ \ \ \ [2] }[/math]


Here I derived the formula [2] just inversing the formula [1]. I can as well start from exact solution above, solve this equation with respect to neutron energy, do the non-relativistic approximation and get exactly the same formula [2]. But anyway we ended up with two useful non-relativistic formulas we can analyze now:


1) from formula [1] above we can predict the threshold of [math]\displaystyle{ ^2D(\gamma, n) }[/math] reaction in [math]\displaystyle{ \Theta_n = 90^o }[/math] direction:

[math]\displaystyle{ E_{\gamma} = 1.715\ MeV }[/math]

comment: it's not true because by momentum conservation there are no neutron with zero kinetic energy.

2) from formula [1] above we can predict the incident photon energy based on the detected neutron energy (neutron polarimeter).

3) from formula [2] above we can predict the detected neutron energy based on the incident photon energy.

 -  for the incident photons up to [math]\displaystyle{ 25\ MeV }[/math] we can detect neutrons up to  [math]\displaystyle{ 11.62\ MeV }[/math]
 -  for the incident photons up to [math]\displaystyle{ 44\ MeV }[/math] we can detect neutrons up to  [math]\displaystyle{ 21.10\ MeV }[/math]

4) we can do the error calculations.

Example of error calculation

simple error calculation

Say, we have, 10 MeV neutron with uncertainty 1 MeV, the corresponding uncertainly for photons energy is:

[math]\displaystyle{  \delta T_{\gamma} = 2.003\ \delta T_n = 2.003\times 1\ MeV = 2.003\ MeV  }[/math]

photon kinetic energy error [math]\displaystyle{ \delta T_{\gamma} }[/math] as function of TOF uncertainty [math]\displaystyle{ \delta t }[/math]

In the calculations below I attempted to predict the uncertainty in photons energy based on uncertainty in neutrons time of flight.


The neutron kinetic energy as function of time of flight is:

[math]\displaystyle{ T_n = m_n (\gamma - 1) = m_n\left[ \frac{1}{\sqrt{1-\left(\frac{l}{c\ t}\right)^2}} - 1 \right] }[/math]

By taking derivative of the expression above we can find the relative error for neutron energy:

[math]\displaystyle{ \delta T_n \left(\delta t\right) = -\ \frac{m\ l^2}{\left(1-\left(\frac{l}{c\ t}\right)^2\right)^{3/2}c^2 t^3} \cdot  \delta t }[/math]

In that formula for [math]\displaystyle{ \delta T_n }[/math] we need to know the neutron time of flight which is:

[math]\displaystyle{ t:=\frac{l}{c\ \beta_n} = \frac{l}{c\ (p_n/E_n)} =
         \frac{l\ (T_n + m_n)}{c\sqrt{T_n^2+2m_nT_n}} }[/math]


And now we can calculate the relative error for photon energy using the formula derived before:

[math]\displaystyle{ \delta T_{\gamma} = 2.003\ \delta T_n }[/math]


Say, the detector is 1.5 m away and neutron's time of flight uncertainty is:

[math]\displaystyle{ \delta t = 1\ ns }[/math]

And below are y numerical calculations and plot with error bars:

And in the plot below I have overlay my error calculations using the formulas above:


Now say, the detector is 1.5 m away and neutron's time of flight uncertainty is:

[math]\displaystyle{ \delta t = 3\ ns }[/math]

[math]\displaystyle{ \Theta }[/math] dependence

Starting from general kinematic relations:

[math]\displaystyle{  m_p^2 = m_D^2 + m_n^2 +  2T_{\gamma}\cdot m_D  - 2m_D\cdot E_n - 2\left( T_{\gamma}E_n - T_{\gamma}p_n\cos\Theta_n\right)  }[/math]

we can solve the equation above with respect to [math]\displaystyle{ T_{\gamma} }[/math] as function of neutron energy [math]\displaystyle{ T_n }[/math] and neutron angle [math]\displaystyle{ \Theta_n }[/math]

[math]\displaystyle{ T_{\gamma} = \frac{m_p^2-m_n^2-m_D^2+2m_D E_n}{2(m_D-E_n-p_n\cos\Theta_n)} }[/math]

and using

[math]\displaystyle{ E_n = T_n+m_n }[/math]
[math]\displaystyle{ p_n = \sqrt{E_n^2-m_n^2} = \sqrt{T_n^2+2T_n m_n} }[/math]

finally

[math]\displaystyle{ T_{\gamma} = \frac{m_p^2-m_n^2-m_D^2+2m_D (T_n+m_n)}{2\left(m_D-m_n-T_n-\sqrt{T_n^2+2T_n m_n}\cos\Theta_n\right)} }[/math]


Let's do some plots using the equation derived above. Below is presented the photon energy as function of neutron angle for several values of neutron energy:



And below are the photon energy as function of neutron angle and neutron energy:



Go Back