Difference between revisions of "Forest ModernPhysics"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 58: | Line 58: | ||
; Note <math>\beta = \frac{pc}{E_{tot}} = \frac{17.5 \mbox{keV}}{511 \mbox{keV}} = 0.03 \Rightarrow</math> classical physics may be used for electrons below 50 keV | ; Note <math>\beta = \frac{pc}{E_{tot}} = \frac{17.5 \mbox{keV}}{511 \mbox{keV}} = 0.03 \Rightarrow</math> classical physics may be used for electrons below 50 keV | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | + | ; Clinton Davisson and Lest Germer in 1927 published conclusive evidence for the diffraction of electron waves using 54 eV electrons impinging a crystal made of nickel. | |
+ | |||
+ | One problem to overcome for the experiment was that such a low energy electron scatters in air. The had to do the experiment in a vacuum. | ||
+ | |||
From hyperphysics: | From hyperphysics: |
Revision as of 02:53, 30 September 2009
Matter Waves (Wave Particle Duality)
Special relativity said that
if m=0
Plank said he could fit the Black Body radiation data assuming that that
where = Plank's constant
Combining the two we have
photons have momentum like a particle (mv)
Do particles reciprocate and behave like photons?
De Broglie's Hypothesis
If photons can behave like particles by having momentum
Then can a particle behave like a wave by having wavelength
or
de Broglie Hypothesis
Davisson and Germer
We know that X-rays having a wavelength of
make an interference patter on an aluminum foil.
Another way to calculate
- What would be the energy of an electron with the same wavelength as the above X-ray?
relativistic total energy relation
- = 511.3 keV
relativistic kinetic energy
- Note classical physics may be used for electrons below 50 keV
- Clinton Davisson and Lest Germer in 1927 published conclusive evidence for the diffraction of electron waves using 54 eV electrons impinging a crystal made of nickel.
One problem to overcome for the experiment was that such a low energy electron scatters in air. The had to do the experiment in a vacuum.
From hyperphysics: