|
|
(853 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
− | == Overview == | + | ==Class Admin== |
| | | |
− | === Particle Detection ===
| |
− | A device detects a particle only after the particle transfers energy to the device.
| |
| | | |
− | Energy intrinsic to a device depends on the material used in a device
| + | [[TF_SPIM_ClassAdmin]] |
| | | |
− | Some device of material with an average atomic number (<math>Z</math>) is at some temperature (<math>T</math>). The materials atoms are in constant thermal motion (unless T = zero degrees Klevin).
| + | == Homework Problems== |
| + | [[HomeWork_Simulations_of_Particle_Interactions_with_Matter]] |
| | | |
− | Statistical Thermodynamics tells us that the canonical energy distribution of the atoms is given by the Maxwell-Boltzmann statistics such that
| + | =Introduction= |
| | | |
− | <math>P(E) = \frac{1}{kT} e^{-\frac{E}{kT}}</math>
| + | [[TF_SPIM_Intro]] |
| | | |
− | <math>P(E)</math> represents the probability of any atom in the system having an energy <math>E</math> where
| + | = Energy Loss = |
| | | |
− | <math>k= 1.38 \times 10^{-23} \frac{J}{mole \cdot K}</math>
| + | [[TF_SPIM_StoppingPower]] |
| | | |
− | Note: You may be more familiar with the Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution in the form
| + | Ann. Phys. vol. 5, 325, (1930) |
− | | |
− | <math>N(\nu) = 4 \pi N \left ( \frac{m}{2\pi k T} \right ) ^{3/2} v^2 e^{-mv^2/2kT}</math>
| |
− | | |
− | where <math>N(v) \Delta v</math> would represent the molesules in the gas sample with speeds between <math>v</math> and <math>v + \Delta v</math>
| |
− | | |
− | ==== Example 1: P(E=5 eV) ====
| |
− | | |
− | ;What is the probability that an atom in a 12.011 gram block of carbon would have and energy of 5 eV?
| |
− | | |
− | First lets check that the probability distribution is Normailized; ie: does <math>\int_0^{\infty} P(E) dE =1</math>?
| |
− | | |
− | | |
− | <math>\int_0^{\infty} P(E) dE = \int_0^{\infty} \frac{1}{kT} e^{-\frac{E}{kT}} dE = \frac{1}{kT} \frac{1}{\frac{1}{-kT}} e^{-\frac{E}{kT}} \mid_0^{\infty} = - [e^{-\infty} - e^0]= 1</math>
| |
− | | |
− | <math>P(E=5eV)</math> is calculated by integrating P(E) over some energy interval ( ie:<math> N(v) dv</math>). I will arbitrarily choose 4.9 eV to 5.1 eV as a starting point.
| |
− | | |
− | | |
− | <math>\int_{4.9 eV}^{5.1 eV} P(E) dE = - [e^{-5.1 eV/kT} - e^{4.9 eV/kT}]</math>
| |
− | | |
− | <math>k= (1.38 \times 10^{-23} \frac{J}{mole \cdot K} ) = (1.38 \times 10^{-23} \frac{J}{mole \cdot K} )(6.42 \times 10^{18} \frac{eV}{J})= 8.614 \times 10^{-5} \frac {eV}{mole \cdot K}</math>
| |
− | | |
− | assuming a room empterature of <math>T=300 K</math>
| |
− | | |
− | then<math>kT = 0.0258 \frac{eV}{mole}</math>
| |
− | | |
− | and
| |
− | | |
− | <math>\int_{4.9 eV}^{5.1 eV} P(E) dE = - [e^{-5.1/0.0258} - e^{4.9/0.0258}] = 4.48 \times 10^{-83} - 1.9 \times 10^{-86} \approx 4.48 \times 10^{-83}</math>
| |
− | | |
− | or in other words the precise mathematical calculation of the probability may be approximated by just using the distribution function alone
| |
− | | |
− | <math>P(E=5eV) = e^{-5/0.0258} \approx 10^{-85}</math>
| |
− | | |
− | This approximation breaks down as <math>E \rightarrow 0.0258 eV</math>
| |
− | | |
− | Since we have 12.011 grams of carbon and 1 mole of carbon = 12.011 g = <math>6 \times 10^{23} </math>carbon atoms
| |
− | | |
− | We do not expect to see a 5 eV carbon atom in a sample size of <math>6 \times 10^{23} </math> carbon atoms when the probability of observing such an atom is <math>\approx 10^{-85}</math>
| |
− | | |
− | The energy we expect to see would be calculated by
| |
− | | |
− | <math><E> = \int_{0}^{\infty} E \cdot P(E) dE</math>
| |
− | | |
− | If you used this block of carbon as a detector you would easily notice an event in which a carbon atom absorbed 5 eV of energy as compared to the energy of a typical atom in the carbon block.
| |
− | | |
− | ----
| |
− | | |
− | ;Silicon detectors and Ionization chambers are two commonly used devices for detecting radiation.
| |
− | | |
− | approximately 1 eV of energy is all that you need to create an electron-ion pair in Silicon
| |
− | | |
− | <math>P(E=1 eV) = e^{-1/0.0258} \approx 10^{-17}</math>
| |
− | | |
− | approximately 10 eV of energy is needed to ionize an atom in a gas chamber
| |
− | | |
− | <math>P(E=10 eV) = e^{-10/0.0258} \approx 10^{-169}</math>
| |
− | | |
− | | |
− | | |
− | The low probability of having an atom with 10 eV of energy means that an ionization chamber would have a better Signal to Noise ratio (SNR) for detecting 10 eV radiation than a silicon detector
| |
− | | |
− | But if you cool the silicon detector to 200 degrees Kelvin (200 K) then
| |
− | | |
− | <math>P(E=1 eV) = e^{-1/0.0172} \approx 10^{-26} << 10^{-17}</math>
| |
− | | |
− | So cooling your detector will slow the atoms down making it more noticable when one of the atoms absorbs energy.
| |
− | | |
− | also, if the radiation flux is large, more electron-hole pairs are created and you get a more noticeable signal.
| |
− | | |
− | Unfortunately, with some detectore, like silicon, you can cause radiation damage that diminishes it's quantum efficiency for absorbing energy.
| |
− | | |
− | === The Monte Carlo method ===
| |
− | ; Stochastic
| |
− | : from the greek word "stachos"
| |
− | : a means of, relating to, or characterized by conjecture and randomness.
| |
− | | |
− | | |
− | A stochastic process is one whose behavior is non-deterministic in that the next state of the process is partially determined.
| |
− | | |
− | Physics has many such non-deterministic systems:
| |
− | | |
− | *Quantum Mechanics
| |
− | *Thermodynamics
| |
− | | |
− | | |
− | Basically the monte-carlo method uses a random number generator (RNG) to generate a distribution (gaussian, uniform, Poission,...) which is used to solve a stochastic process based on an astochastic description.
| |
− | | |
− | | |
− | ==== Example 2 Calculation of <math>\pi</math>====
| |
− | | |
− | ;Astochastic description:
| |
− | : <math>\pi</math> may be measured as the ratio of the area of a circle of radius <math>r</math> divided by the area of a square of length <math>2r</math>
| |
− | | |
− | [[Image:PI_from_AreaRatio.jpg]]<math>\frac{A_{circle}}{A_{square}} = \frac{\pi r^2}{4r^2} = \frac{\pi}{4}</math>
| |
− | | |
− | You can measure the value of <math>\pi</math> if you physically measure the above ratios.
| |
− | | |
− | ; Stochastic description:
| |
− | : Construct a dart board representing the above geometry, throw several darts at it, and look at a ratio of the number of darts in the circle to the total number of darts thrown (assuming you always hit the dart board).
| |
− | | |
− | ; Monte-Carlo Method
| |
− | :Here is an outline of a program to calulate <math>\pi</math> using the Monte-Carlo method with the above Stochastic description
| |
− | [[Image:MC_PI_fromAreaRatio.jpg]]
| |
− | begin loop
| |
− | x=rnd
| |
− | y=rnd
| |
− | dist=sqrt(x*x+y*y)
| |
− | if dist <= 1.0 then numbCircHits+=1.0
| |
− | numbSquareHist += 1.0
| |
− | end loop
| |
− | print PI = 4*numbCircHits/numbSquareHits
| |
− | | |
− | === A Unix Primer ===
| |
− | To get our feet wet using the UNIX operating system, we will try to solve example 2 above using a RNG under UNIX
| |
− | | |
− | ==== List of important Commands====
| |
− | | |
− | # ls
| |
− | # pwd
| |
− | # cd
| |
− | # df
| |
− | # ssh
| |
− | # scp
| |
− | # mkdir
| |
− | # printenv
| |
− | # emacs, vi, vim
| |
− | # make, gcc
| |
− | # man
| |
− | # less
| |
− | # rm
| |
− | | |
− | ----
| |
− | Most of the commands executed within a shell under UNIX have command line arguments (switches) which tell the command to print information about using the command to the screen. The common forms of these switches are "-h", "--h", or "--help"
| |
− | | |
− | ls --help
| |
− | ssh -h
| |
− | | |
− | '' the switch deponds on your flavor of UNIX''
| |
− | | |
− | if using the switch doesn;t help you can try the "man" (sort for manual) pages (if they were installed).
| |
− | Try
| |
− | man -k pwd
| |
− | | |
− | the above command will search the manual for the key word "pwd"
| |
− | | |
− | ==== Example 3: using UNIX ====
| |
− | | |
− | Step
| |
− | # login to inca.<br> [http://physics.isu.edu/~tforest/Classes/NucSim/Day1/XwindowsOnWindows.html click here for a description of logging in if using windows]
| |
− | # mkdir src
| |
− | # cd src
| |
− | # cp -R ~tforest/NucSim/Day1 ./
| |
− | # ls
| |
− | # cd Day1
| |
− | # make
| |
− | #./rndtest
| |
− | | |
− | [http://physics.isu.edu/~tforest/Classes/NucSim/Day1/RNG/Marsaglia/noviceExample/ Here is a web link to the source files you can copy in case the above doesn't work]
| |
− | | |
− | === A Root Primer ===
| |
− | ==== Example 1: Create Ntuple and Draw Histogram====
| |
| | | |
− | === Cross Sections === | + | =Interactions of Electrons and Photons with Matter= |
− | ==== Definitions ====
| |
− | ;Total cross section
| |
− | :<math>\sigma</math> = <math>\equiv \frac{\# particles\; scattered} {\frac{ \# incident \; particles}{Area}}</math>
| |
| | | |
− | ;Differential cross section
| + | [[TF_SPIM_e-gamma]] |
− | :<math>\sigma(\theta)</math> = <math> \frac{d \sigma}{d \Omega} \equiv \frac{\frac{\# particles\; scattered}{solid \; angle}} {\frac{ \# incident \; particles}{Area}}</math>
| |
| | | |
− | ; Solid Angle
| + | = Hadronic Interactions = |
− | :[[Image:SolidAngleDefinition.jpg]]
| |
− | : <math>\Omega</math>= surface area of a sphere covered by the detector
| |
− | : ie;the detectors area projected onto the surface of a sphere
| |
− | :A= surface area of detector
| |
− | :r=distance from interaction point to detector
| |
− | :<math>\Omega = \frac{A}{r^2} </math>sterradians
| |
− | : <math>A_{sphere} = 4 \pi r^2</math> if your detector was a hollow ball
| |
− | :<math>\Omega_{max} = \frac{4 \pi r^2}{r^2} = 4\pi</math>sterradians
| |
| | | |
− | ;Units
| + | [[TF_SPIM_HadronicInteractions]] |
− | :Cross-sections have the units of Area
| |
− | :1 barn = <math>10^{-28} m^2</math>
| |
− | ; [units of <math>\sigma(\theta)</math>] =<math>\frac{\frac{[particles]}{[sterradian]}} {\frac{ [ particles]}{[m^2]}} = m^2</math>
| |
| | | |
| + | = Final Project= |
| | | |
− | [[Image:FixedTargetScatteringCrossSection.jpg]]
| + | A final project will be submitted that will be graded with the following metrics: |
− | ; Fixed target scattering
| |
− | : <math>N_{in}</math>= # of particles in = <math>I \cdot A_{in}</math>
| |
− | :: <math>A_{in}</math> is the area of the ring of incident particles
| |
− | :<math>dN_{in} = I \cdot dA = I (2\pi b) db</math>= # particles in a ring of radius <math>b</math> and thickness <math>db</math> | |
| | | |
− | You can measure <math>\sigma(\theta)</math> if you measure the # of particles detected <math>d N</math> in a known detector solid angle <math>d \Omega</math> from a known incident particle Flux (<math>I</math>) as
| + | 1.) The document must be less than 15 pages. |
| | | |
− | <math>\sigma(\theta) = \frac{\frac{d N}{ d \Omega}}{I}</math>
| + | 2.) The document must contain references in a bibliography (5 points) . |
| | | |
− | Alternatively if you have a theory which tells you <math>\sigma(\theta)</math> which you want to test experimentally with a beam of flux <math>I</math> then you would measure counts (particles)
| + | 3.) A comparison must be made between GEANT4's prediction and either the prediction of someone else or an experimental result(30 points). |
| | | |
− | <math>dN = I \sigma(\theta) d \Omega = I \sigma(\theta) \frac{d A}{r^2} = I \sigma(\theta) \frac{r^2 \sin(\theta) d \theta d \phi}{r^2}</math>
| + | 4.) The graphs must be of publication quality with font sizes similar or larger than the 12 point font (10 points). |
| | | |
− | ;Units
| + | 5.) The document must be grammatically correct (5 points). |
− | : <math>[d N] = [\frac {particles}{m^2}][m^2] [sterradian] </math> = # of particles
| |
− | : or for a count rate divide both sides by time and you get beam current on the RHS
| |
− | : integrate and you have the total number of counts
| |
| | | |
− | ;Classical Scattering
| + | 6.) The document format must contain the following sections: An abstract of 5 sentences (5 points) , an Introduction(10 points), a Theory section (20 points) , if applicable a section describing the experiment that was simulated, a section delineating the comparisons that were made, and a conclusion( 15 points). |
− | : In classical scattering you get the same number of particle out that you put in (no capture, conversion,..)
| |
− | : <math>d N_{in} = dN</math> | |
− | :<math>d N_{in} = I dA = I (2\pi b) db</math>
| |
− | : <math>d N = I \sigma(\theta) d \Omega = I \sigma(\theta) \sin(\theta) d \theta d \phi = I \sigma(\theta) \sin(\theta) d \theta (2 \pi )</math>
| |
− | :<math> I (2\pi b) db = I \sigma(\theta) \sin(\theta) d \theta (2 \pi )</math>
| |
− | :<math> b db = \sigma(\theta) \sin(\theta) d \theta </math>
| |
− | :<math>\sigma(\theta) = \frac{b}{\sin(\theta)}\frac{db}{d \theta}</math>
| |
− | :<math>\frac{db}{d \theta}</math> tells you how the impact parameter <math>b</math> changes with scattering angle <math>\theta</math>
| |
| | | |
− | ==== Example : Elastic Scattering ==== | + | =Resources= |
− | This example is an example of classical scattering.
| |
| | | |
− | Our goal is to find <math>\sigma(\theta)</math> for an elastic collision of 2 impenetrable spheres of diameter <math>a</math>. To solve this elastic scattering problem we will describe the collision using the Center of Mas (C.M.) coordinate system in terms of the reduced mass. As we shall see, by using C.M. coordinate system the 2-body collision becomes a 1-body problem. Then we will describe the motion of the reduced mass in the C.M. Frame.
| + | [http://geant4.web.cern.ch/geant4/ GEANT4 Home Page] |
| | | |
− | [[Image:SPIM_ElasCollis_Lab_CM_Frame.jpg]] | + | [http://root.cern.ch ROOT Home page] |
| | | |
− | ; Variable definitions
| + | [http://conferences.fnal.gov/g4tutorial/g4cd/Documentation/WorkshopExercises/ Fermi Lab Example] |
− | :<math>b</math>= impact parameter ; distance of closest approach | |
− | :<math>m_1</math>= mass of incoming ball
| |
− | :<math>m_2</math>= mass of target ball
| |
− | :<math>u_1</math>= iniital velocity of incoming ball in Lab Frame
| |
− | :<math>v_1</math>= final velocity of <math>m_1</math> in Lab Frame
| |
− | :<math>\psi</math>= scattering angle of <math>m_1</math> in Lab frame after collision
| |
− | :<math>u_1^{\prime}</math>= iniital velocity of <math>m_1</math> in C.M. Frame
| |
− | :<math>v_1^{\prime}</math>= final velocity of <math>m_1</math> in C.M. Frame
| |
− | :<math>u_2^{\prime}</math>= iniital velocity of <math>m_2</math> in C.M. Frame
| |
− | :<math>v_2^{\prime}</math>= final velocity of <math>m_2</math> in C.M. Frame
| |
− | :<math>\theta</math>= scattering angle of <math>m_1</math> in C.M. frame after collision
| |
| | | |
| | | |
− | ;Determining the reduced mass:
| + | [http://physics.nist.gov/PhysRefData/Star/Text/ESTAR.html NIST Range Tables] |
| | | |
| + | [http://ie.lbl.gov/xray/ X-ray specturm] |
| | | |
− | [[Image:SPIM_2Body-1BodyCoordSystem.jpg]] | + | [[Installing_GEANT4.9.3_Fsim]] |
| | | |
− | ; vector definitions
| + | == Saving/restoring Random number seed== |
− | :<math>\vec{r}_1</math> = a position vector pointing to the location of <math>m_1</math>
| |
− | :<math>\vec{r}_2</math> = a position vector pointing to the location of <math>m_2</math>
| |
− | :<math>\vec{R}</math> = a position vector pointing to the center of mass of the two ball system
| |
− | :<math>\vec{r} \equiv \vec{r}_1 - \vec{r}_2</math> = the magnitude of this vector is the distance between the two masses
| |
| | | |
− | In the C.M. reference frame the above vectors have the following relationships
| + | You save the current state of the random number generator with the command |
| | | |
− | # <math>\vec{R} = 0 = \frac{m_1 \vec{r}_1 + m_2 \vec{r}_2}{m_1 + m_2} \Rightarrow m_2 \vec{r}_1 = -m_2 \vec{r}_2</math>
| + | /random/setSavingFlag 1 |
− | # <math>\vec{r}_1 - \vec{r}_2 = \vec{r}</math>
| |
| | | |
− | solving the above equations for <math>\vec{r_1}</math> and <math>\vec{r_2}</math> and defining the reduced mass <math>\mu</math> as
| + | /run/beamOn 100 |
| | | |
− | :<math>\mu = \frac{m_1 \cdot m_2}{m_1 + m_2} \equiv</math> reduced mass
| + | /random/saveThisRun |
| | | |
− | leads to
| + | A file is created called |
| | | |
− | : <math>\vec{r}_1 = \frac{\mu}{m_1} \vec{r}</math>
| + | currentEvent.rndm |
− | : <math>\vec{r}_2 = \frac{\mu}{m_2} \vec{r}</math>
| |
| | | |
− | We can use the above reduced mass relationships to construct the Lagrangian in terms of <math>\vec{r}</math> instead of <math>\vec{r}_1</math> and <math> \vec{r}_2</math> thereby reducing the problem from a 2-body problem to a 1-body problem.
| + | /control/shell mv currentEvent.rndm currentEvent10.rndm |
| | | |
− | ; Construct the Lagrangian
| |
| | | |
− | The Lagrangian is defined as:
| + | You can restore the random number generator and begin generating random number from the last save time |
| | | |
| + | /random/resetEngineFrom currentEvent.rndm |
| | | |
− | <math>\mathcal{L} = T - U</math>
| + | ==Building GEANT4.11== |
| | | |
− | where
| + | ===4.11.2=== |
| + | [[TF_GEANT4.11]] |
| | | |
− | <math>T \equiv</math> kinetic energy of the system
| + | ==Building GEANT4.10== |
| | | |
− | <math>U \equiv</math> Potential energy of the system which describes the interaction
| |
| | | |
| + | ===4.10.02=== |
| | | |
− | <math>\mathcal{L} = \frac{1}{2} |\vec{\dot{r}}_1|^2 + \frac{1}{2} |\vec{\dot{r}}_2|^2 - U</math>
| + | [[TF_GEANT4.10.2]] |
− | := <math>\frac{1}{2} m_1 \left (\frac{m_2}{m1+m_2} \right )^2 |\vec{\dot{r}}|^2 + \frac{1}{2} m_2 \left (\frac{m_1}{m1+m_2} \right )^2 |\vec{\dot{r}}|^2 -U(\vec{r})</math>
| + | ===4.10.01=== |
| | | |
− | after substituting derivative of the expressions for <math>\vec{r_1}</math> and <math>\vec{r}_2</math>
| + | [[TF_GEANT4.10.1]] |
| | | |
− | : = <math>\frac{1}{2} \mu |\vec{\dot{r}}|^2 -U(\vec{r})</math> The 2-body problem is now described by a 1-body Lagrangian
| + | ==Building GEANT4.9.6== |
| | | |
− | Lagranges equations of motion are given by
| + | [[TF_GEANT4.9.6]] |
− | : <math>\frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial q} = \frac{d}{dt} \frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\dot{q}}</math>
| |
− | where <math>q</math> represents on of the coordinate (cannonical variables).
| |
| | | |
− | To get the classical scattering cross section we are interested in finding an expression for the dependence of the impact parameter on the scattering angle,<math>\frac{d b}{d \theta}</math>.
| + | ==Building GEANT4.9.5== |
| | | |
− | Now lets redraw the collision in terms of a reference frame fixed on <math>m_2</math> (before collision its the Lab Frame but not after collision).
| + | [[TF_GEANT4.9.5]] |
| | | |
− | [[Image:SPIM_ElasCollis_CMFrame.jpg]] [[Media:SPIM_ElasColls_CMFrame_xfig.txt]]
| + | An old version of Installation notes for versions prior to 9.5 |
| | | |
− | The C.M. Frame rides along the center of mass, the above coordinate system though has its origin on <math>m_2</math> and only overlaps in space with the CM frame at the collision point sufficiently to illustrate <math>\theta</math>. If <math>b > a</math> then there is no collision (<math>\theta=0</math>), otherwise a collision happens when r=a (the distance between the balls is equal to their diameter). A head on collision is defined as <math>b=0</math> (<math>\theta=\pi</math>).
| + | [http://brems.iac.isu.edu/~tforest/NucSim/Day3/ Old Install Notes] |
| | | |
− | ;Observation
| |
− | : as <math>\theta</math> gets smaller, <math>b</math> gets bigger
| |
− | : <math>\frac{d b}{d \theta} < 0</math>
| |
| | | |
− | Using plane polar coordinates (<math>r, \phi</math>) we can describe the problem in the lab frame as:
| + | Visualization Libraries: |
| | | |
− | <math>\vec{v} = \dot{R} \hat{e}_r + r \dot{\phi} \hat{e}_{\phi}</math>
| + | [http://www.opengl.org/ OpenGL] |
| | | |
− | <math>T = \frac{1}{2} \mu ( \dot{r)}^2 + r^2 \dot{\phi}^2)</math>
| + | [http://geant4.kek.jp/~tanaka/DAWN/About_DAWN.html DAWN] |
| | | |
| | | |
− | <math>U(r) = \left \{ {0 \; r > a \atop \infty \; r \le a} \right .</math>
| + | [http://doc.coin3d.org/Coin/ Coin3D] |
| | | |
− | <math>\mathcal{L} = T -U = \frac{1}{2} \mu ( \dot{r}^2 + r^2 \dot{\phi}^2) - U(r)</math>
| + | ==Compiling G4 with ROOT== |
| | | |
− | Lagranges Equation of Motion:
| + | These instruction describe how you can create a tree within ExN02SteppingVerbose to store tracking info in an array (max number of steps in a track is set to 100 for the desired particle) |
− | | |
− | <math>\frac{\partial \mathcal {L}}{\partial \phi} = \frac{d}{d t} \frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial \dot{\phi}}</math>
| |
− | <math>0 = \frac{d}{d t} [ \mu r^2 \dot{\phi}] \Rightarrow</math> there is a constant of motion ( Constant angular momentum)
| |
− | | |
− | <math>\ell \equiv \mu r^2 \dot{\phi} = \vec{r} \times \vec{p} = \vec{r} \times \mu \vec{v} = r^2 \mu \dot{\phi}</math>
| |
− | | |
− | substitute <math>\ell</math> into <math>\mathcal{L}</math>
| |
− | | |
− | <math>\mathcal{L} = \frac{1}{2} ( \mu \dot{r}^2 + \frac{\ell}{\mu r^2} ) - U(r)</math>
| |
− | | |
− | The two equations above are in terms of <math>r</math> and <math>\phi</math> whereas our goal is to find an expression for <math>\frac{ d b}{ d \theta}</math>. Since <math>r</math> is related to <math>b</math> and <math>\phi</math> is related to<math> \theta</math> (<math>\theta = \pi - 2\phi</math>; see figure above) we should try and find expressions for <math>d \phi</math> in terms of <math>r(b)</math>
| |
− | | |
− | ;Trick
| |
− | : <math>\dot{\phi} = \frac{d \phi}{d t} = \frac{d \phi}{d r} \frac{d r}{d t}</math>
| |
− | :<math>\Rightarrow \ell = \mu r^2 \frac{d \phi}{d r} \dot{r}</math>
| |
− | :or
| |
− | : <math>d \phi = \frac{\ell}{\mu r^2 \dot{r}} dr</math>
| |
− | | |
− | We now need an expression for <math>\dot{r}</math> in order to integrate the above equation to determine the functional dependence of <math>\phi</math> and hence<math> \theta</math>.
| |
− | | |
− | Since Energy is conserved (Elastic Scattering), we may define the Hamiltonian as
| |
− | | |
− | <math>H = T + U = \frac{1}{2} (mu \dot{r}^2 + \frac{\ell}{\mu r^2}) + U(r) = constant \equiv E</math>
| |
− | | |
− | solving for <math>\dot{r}</math>
| |
− | | |
− | <math>\dot{r} = \pm \sqrt{\frac{2(E-U(r))}{\mu} - \frac{\ell^2}{\mu^2 r^2}}</math>
| |
− | | |
− | substituting the above into the equation for <math>d \phi</math> and integrating:
| |
− | | |
− | <math>\phi = \int d \phi = \int_{r_{min}}^{r_{max}} \frac{\ell}{\mu r^2 \dot{R}} dr</math>
| |
− | | |
− | <math>r_{min} = a \; \; \; r_{max}= \infty \; \; \; U(r) = 0 : a \le r \le \infty</math>
| |
− | | |
− | <math>\phi = \int_a^{\infty} \frac{\ell} {r^2 \sqrt{2 \mu E - \frac{\ell^2}{r^2}} }dr</math>
| |
− | | |
− | For <math>a \le r \le \infty</math> : <math>E = \frac{1}{2} \mu v^2_{cm} \Rightarrow v_{cm} = \sqrt{\frac{2E}{\mu}}</math>
| |
− | | |
− | <math>\vec{\ell} = \vec{r} \times \vec{p} \Rightarrow |\vec{\ell}| = |\vec{r}| |\vec{p}| \sin(\phi) = r \mu v_{cm} \sin(\phi) = r \mu \left ( \sqrt{\frac{2E}{\mu}} \right) \sin(\phi) = \sqrt{2 \mu E} r\sin(\phi) =\sqrt{2 \mu E} b</math>
| |
− | | |
− | substituting this expression for <math>\ell</math> into the last expression for <math>\phi</math> above :
| |
− | | |
− | <math>\phi =\int_a^{\infty} \frac{b dr}{r\sqrt{(r^2-b^2)}}</math>
| |
− | | |
− | ;Integral Table
| |
− | : <math>\int \frac{dx}{x\sqrt{(\alpha x^2+\beta x+\gamma)}} = \frac{-1}{\sqrt{-\gamma}} \sin^{-1} \left (\frac{\beta x+2\gamma}{|x|\sqrt{\beta^2-4\alpha \gamma}} \right )</math>
| |
− | | |
− | let <math>x=r \;\; \alpha=1 \;\; \beta=0 \;\; \gamma=-b^2</math>
| |
− | | |
− | then
| |
− | | |
− | <math>\phi = \left . b \frac{1}{\sqrt{-(-b^2)}} \sin^{-1} \left (\frac{-2b^2}{r\sqrt{0-4(1)(-b^2) } }\right ) \right |_a^{\infty} = \sin^{-1} (0)- \sin^{-1}(-\frac{b}{a})</math>
| |
− | | |
− | or
| |
− | | |
− | <math>\sin(\phi) = \frac{b}{a} = \sin \left ( \frac{\pi}{2} - \frac{\theta}{2} \right ) = \cos \left ( \frac{\theta}{2} \right )</math>
| |
− | | |
− | :<math>\Rightarrow b = a \cos \left( \frac{\theta}{2} \right)</math>
| |
− | | |
− | | |
− | ; Now substitue the above into the expression for <math>\sigma(\theta)</math>
| |
− | | |
− | <math>\sigma(\theta) = \frac{b}{\sin(\theta)} \frac{d b}{d \theta} = \frac{a \cos(\theta/2)}{sin(\theta)} a[-\sin(\theta/2)]\frac{1}{2}
| |
− | = \frac{a^2}{2} \frac{\cos(\theta/2) \sin(\theta/2)}{\sin(\theta)}</math>
| |
− | | |
− | drop the negative sign, sqrt in denominator allows this, and use the trig identity
| |
− | | |
− | :<math>\sin \left (\frac{\theta}{2} + \frac{\theta}{2} \right ) = \cos \left (\frac{\theta}{2} \right) \sin \left (\frac{\theta}{2} \right ) + \cos \left ( \frac{\theta}{2} \right ) \sin \left (\frac{\theta}{2} \right )</math>
| |
− | :<math>\sin(\theta) = 2 \cos \left (\frac{\theta}{2} \right ) \sin \left (\frac{\theta}{2} \right )</math>
| |
− | | |
− | <math>\sigma(\theta) = \frac{a^2}{2} \frac{1}{2} = \frac{a^2}{4}</math>
| |
− | | |
− | <math>\sigma = \int \sigma(\theta) d \Omega = \frac{a^2}{2} \frac{1}{2} 4 \pi = \pi a^2</math>
| |
− | | |
− | | |
− | ;compare with result from definition
| |
− | | |
− | :<math>\sigma</math> = scattering cross-section <math>\equiv \frac{\# particles\; scattered} {\frac{ \# incident \; particles}{Area}}</math>
| |
− | :number of particles scattered = number of incident particles
| |
− | : Area = <math> \pi a^2</math> = The area profile in which a collision occurs[[Image:ClassicalEffectiveScatteringArea.jpg | 200 px]]
| |
− | | |
− | <math>\sigma = \frac{{N}}{\frac{ N}{\pi a^2}} = \pi a^2</math>
| |
− | | |
− | ==== Lab Frame Cross Sections ====
| |
− | | |
− | The C.M. frame is often chosen to theoretically calculate cross-sections even though experiments are conducted in the Lab frame. In such cases you will need to transform cross-sections between two frames.
| |
− | | |
− | The total cross-section should be frame independent
| |
− | | |
− | :<math>\sigma_{C.M.} = \sigma_{Lab}</math>
| |
− | | |
− | or
| |
− | | |
− | : <math>\sigma(\theta) d \Omega = \sigma(\psi) d \Omega^{\prime}</math>
| |
− | | |
− | where
| |
− | | |
− | <math>\theta</math> is in the CM frame and <math>\psi</math> is in the Lab frame.
| |
− | | |
− | | |
− | ;A non-relativistic transformation:
| |
− | | |
− | : <math>\sigma(\theta) d \Omega = \sigma(\psi) d \Omega^{\prime}</math>
| |
− | : <math>\sigma(\theta) 2 \pi \sin(\theta) d \theta = \sigma(\psi) 2 \pi \sin (\psi) d \psi</math>
| |
− | : <math>\Rightarrow \sigma(\psi) = \frac{\sin(\theta)}{\sin(\psi)} \frac{d \theta}{d \psi} \sigma(\theta)</math>
| |
− | | |
− | The transformation is governed by the dependence of <math>\theta</math> on <math> \psi</math> <math> \left( \frac{d \theta}{d \psi} \right )</math>
| |
− | | |
− | Lets return back to our picture of the scattering Process
| |
− | | |
− | [[Image:SPIM ElasCollis Lab CM Frame.jpg]]
| |
− | | |
− | if we superimpose the vectors <math>\vec{v}_1</math> and <math>\vec{v}_1^{\prime}</math> we have
| |
− | | |
− | [[Image:SPIM ElasCollis Lab CM Frame_Velocities.jpg]]
| |
− | | |
− | Trig identities (non-relativistic Gallilean transformation) tell us
| |
− | | |
− | <math>v_1 \sin(\psi) = v_1^{\prime} \sin(\theta)</math>
| |
− | | |
− | | |
− | <math>v_1 cos(\psi) = v_{cm} + v_1^{\prime} \cos(\theta)</math>
| |
− | | |
− | solving for <math>\psi</math>
| |
− | | |
− | <math>\tan(\psi) = \frac{\sin(\psi)}{\cos(\psi)} = \frac{v_1^{\prime} \sin(\theta)/v_1}{\frac{v_{CM}}{v_1} + \frac{v_1^{\prime} \cos(\theta)}{v_1} }
| |
− | = \frac{\sin(\theta)}{\cos(\theta) + \frac{v_{CM}}{v_1^{\prime}}}</math>
| |
− | | |
− | For an elastic collision only the directions change in the CM Frame: <math>u_1^{\prime}= v_1^{\prime}</math> & <math>u_1^{\prime}= v_2^{\prime}</math>
| |
− | | |
− | ;From the definition of the C.M.
| |
− | ;<math>\vec{v}_{CM} = \frac{m_1 \vec{u}_1 + m_2 \vec{u}_2}{m_1+m_2} = \frac{m_1}{m_1+m_2} \vec{u}_1</math>
| |
− | | |
− | ;conservation of momentum in CM Frame <math>\Rightarrow</math> :
| |
− | :<math>m_1 u_1^{\prime} = - m_2 u_2{\prime}</math>
| |
− | | |
− | :<math> \Rightarrow v_1^{\prime} = u_1^{\prime} = \frac{-m_2}{m_1} u_2^{\prime}</math>
| |
− | | |
− | ; Gallilean Coordinate transformation:
| |
− | ;<math>\vec{u}_1 = \vec{u}_1^{\prime} + \vec{v}_{CM} = \vec{u}_1^{\prime} + \frac{m_1}{m_1+m_2} \vec{u}_1</math>
| |
− | :<math>\Rightarrow u_1{\prime} = \left [ 1 - \frac{m_1}{m_1 + m_2} \right ] u_1 = \frac{m_2}{m_1+m_2}u_1</math>
| |
− | :<math>\Rightarrow v_1^{\prime} = u_1^{\prime} =\frac{m_2}{m_1+m_2} u_1</math>
| |
− | | |
− | ; another experission for <math>\psi</math>
| |
− | | |
− | using the above gallilean transformation we can do the following
| |
− | | |
− | :<math>\frac{v_{CM}}{v_1^{\prime}}= \frac{\frac{m_1}{m_1+m_2} u_1}{\frac{m_2}{m_1+m_2} u_1} = \frac{m_1}{m_2}</math>
| |
− | | |
− | or
| |
− | | |
− | : <math>\tan(\psi) = \frac{\sin(\theta)}{\cos(\theta) + \frac{m_1}{m_2}}</math>
| |
− | | |
− | after a little trig substitution
| |
− | | |
− | <math>\Rightarrow \frac{m_1}{m_2} = \frac{sin(\theta - \psi)}{\sin(\psi)} =</math> constant
| |
− | | |
− | now use the chain rule to find <math>\frac{d \theta}{d \psi}</math>
| |
− | | |
− | : <math>f \equiv \frac{sin(\theta - \psi)}{\sin(\psi)} =</math> constant
| |
− | :<math>df = 0 = \frac{ \partial f}{\partial \psi} d \psi + \frac{ \partial f}{\partial \theta} d \theta </math>
| |
− | : <math>\Rightarrow \frac{d \theta}{d \psi} = \frac{-\frac{ \partial f}{\partial \psi} }{\frac{ \partial f}{\partial \theta} }</math>
| |
− | | |
− | :<math>-\frac{ \partial f}{\partial \psi} = \frac{\cos(\theta - \psi)}{\sin(\psi)} + \frac{\sin(\theta - \psi)}{\sin(\psi)}</math>
| |
− | :<math>\frac{ \partial f}{\partial \theta }= 1 + \frac{\sin(\theta - \psi) \cos(\psi)}{\cos(\theta - \psi) \sin(\psi)}</math>
| |
− | | |
− | after substitution:
| |
− | : <math>\sigma(\psi) = \frac{\sin(\theta)}{\sin(\psi)} \frac{d \theta}{d \psi} \sigma(\theta)</math>
| |
− | : <math>=\frac{\sin(\theta)}{\sin(\psi)} \left [ 1 + \frac{\sin(\theta - \psi) \cos(\psi)}{\cos(\theta - \psi) \sin(\psi)} \right ] \sigma(\theta)</math>
| |
− | | |
− | For the above equation to be more useful one would prefer to recast it in terms of only <math>\psi</math> and masses.
| |
− | | |
− | :<math>\sigma(\psi) = \frac{\left [ \frac{m_1}{m_2}\cos(\psi) + \sqrt{1-\left ( \frac{m_1 \sin(\psi) }{m_2} \right )^2 }\right ]}{\sqrt{1 - \left ( \frac{m_1 \sin(\psi)}{m_2}\right )^2 }}</math>
| |
− | | |
− | == Stopping Power ==
| |
− | Ann. Phys. vol. 5, 325, (1930)
| |
− | === Bethe Equation ===
| |
− | ====Classical Energy Loss ====
| |
| | | |
− | Consider the energy lost when a particle of charge (<math>ze</math>) traveling at speed <math>v</math> is scattered by a target of charge (<math>Ze</math>). Assume only the coulomb force causes the particle to scatter from the target as shown below.
| + | [[G4CompileWRootforTracks]] |
| | | |
− | [[Image:SPIM_Bethe_ClassCoulScat.jpg]]
| + | ==Using SLURM== |
| | | |
− | ; Notice:
| + | http://slurm.schedmd.com/quickstart.html |
− | : as <math>ze</math> is scattered the horizontal component of the coulomb force (<math>F</math>) flips direction; ie no horizontal force
| |
| | | |
− | :<math>F_{vertical} = k \frac{zZe^2}{r^2} \sin(\theta) = k \frac{zZe^2}{r^2} \frac{b}{r}</math>
| |
| | | |
− | where
| + | https://rc.fas.harvard.edu/resources/documentation/convenient-slurm-commands/ |
− | : k =\frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_0} | |
− | : r = distance between incident projectile and target atom
| |
− | : b= impact parameter of collision
| |
| | | |
| + | ===simple batch script for one process job=== |
| | | |
− | Using the definition of Impulse one can determine the momentum change of <math>ze</math> as
| + | create the file submit.sbatch below |
| | | |
− | : <math>\Delta p = \int F dt</math>
| + | <pre> |
| + | #!/bin/sh |
| + | #SBATCH --time=1 |
| + | cd src/PI |
| + | ./PI_MC 100000000000000 |
| + | </pre> |
| | | |
− | Let's assume that the energy lost by the incident particle <math>ze</math> is absorbed by an electron in the target atom. This energy may be cast in terms of the incident particles momentum change as
| + | the execute |
| | | |
− | :<math>\frac{(\Delta p)^2}{2m_e}</math> | + | :sbatch submit.sbatch |
| | | |
− | By calculating the change in momentum (<math>\Delta p</math>) of the incident particle we can infer the amount of energy lost by the incident particle and absorbed one of the target materials atomic electrons.
| + | check if its running with |
| | | |
− | :<math>\Delta P = \int F dt = \int k \frac{zZe^2b}{r^3} dt</math> | + | :squeue |
| | | |
− | using <math>dt = \frac{dx}{v} = \frac{d x}{\beta c}</math> we have
| + | to kill a batch job |
| | | |
− | : <math>= k \frac{zZe^2b}{\beta c} \int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} \frac{ dx}{(x^2+b^2)^{3/2}}</math> | + | :scancel JOBID |
− | : <math>=\frac{kzZe^2b}{\beta c b^2} \int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} \frac{ dx/b}{(1+\frac{x}{b^2})^{3/2}}</math>
| |
| | | |
− | :<math>\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} \frac{ dx/b}{(1+\frac{x}{b^2})^{3/2}}=2</math>
| + | ===On minerve=== |
| | | |
− | :<math> \Delta p = \frac{2kzZe^2b}{\beta c b^2}</math>
| + | Sample script to submit 10 batch jobs. |
| | | |
− | casting this in terms of the classical atomic electron radius <math>r_e</math>
| + | the filename is minervesubmit and you run like |
| + | source minervesubmit |
| | | |
− | : <math>r_e = \frac{k e^2}{m_e v^2} \sim \frac{k e^2}{m_e c^2}</math> just equate <math>F = \frac{ke^2}{r_e^2} = m \frac{v^2}{r_e}</math>
| + | <pre> |
| + | cd /home/foretony/src/GEANT4/geant4.9.5/Simulations/N02wROOT/batch |
| + | qsub submit10mil |
| + | qsub submit20mil |
| + | qsub submit30mil |
| + | qsub submit40mil |
| + | qsub submit50mil |
| + | qsub submit60mil |
| + | qsub submit70mil |
| + | qsub submit80mil |
| + | qsub submit90mil |
| + | qsub submit100mil |
| + | </pre> |
| | | |
− | Then
| + | The file submit10mil looks like this |
| + | <pre> |
| + | #!/bin/sh |
| + | #PBS -l nodes=1 |
| + | #PBS -A FIAC |
| + | #PBS -M foretony@isu.edu |
| + | #PBS -m abe |
| + | # |
| + | source /home/foretony/src/GEANT4/geant4.9.5/geant4.9.6-install/bin/geant4.sh |
| + | cd /home/foretony/src/GEANT4/geant4.9.5/Simulations/N02wROOT/batch/10mil |
| + | ../../exampleN02 run1.mac > /dev/null |
| + | </pre> |
| | | |
− | :<math> \Delta p = \frac{2zZr_e m_e c}{\beta b}</math>
| |
| | | |
− | and
| + | use |
| | | |
− | : <math>\Delta E = \frac{(\Delta p)^2}{2m_e} = 2 \left ( \frac{r_e m_e}{\beta b}\right )^2 \frac {z^2 Z^2 c^2}{m_e}</math> : <math>Z</math> = 1 here because I shall assume the energy is lost to just the electron and the Atom is a spectator
| + | qstat |
| | | |
− | Now let's calculate an expression representing the average energy lost for an incident particle traversing a material of some thickness.
| + | to check that the process is still running |
| | | |
− | Let
| + | use |
| | | |
− | : <math>P(\Delta E)</math> = Probability of an interaction taking place which results in an energy loss <math>\Delta E</math>
| + | qdel jobID# |
| | | |
− | If we let
| + | if you want to kill the batch job, the jobID number shows up when you do stat. |
| | | |
− | Z = Atomic Number = # electrons in target Atom = number of protons in an Atom
| + | for example |
| + | <pre> |
| + | [foretony@minerve HW10]$ qstat |
| + | Job id Name User Time Use S Queue |
| + | ------------------------- ---------------- --------------- -------- - ----- |
| + | 27033.minerve submit foretony 00:41:55 R default |
| + | [foretony@minerve HW10]$ qdel 27033 |
| + | [foretony@minerve HW10]$ qstat |
| + | </pre> |
| | | |
− | N = Avagadros number = <math>6.022 \times 10^{23} \frac{Atoms}{mol}</math>
| + | ==Definitions of Materials== |
| | | |
− | A = Atomic mass = <math>\frac{g}{mole}</math>
| + | [[File:MCNP_Compendium_of_Material_Composition.pdf]] |
| | | |
− | <math>P(\Delta E)</math> = probability of hitting an atomic electron in the area of an annulus of radius (<math>b + db</math>) with an energy transfer between <math>\Delta E</math> and <math>\Delta E + d(\Delta E)</math>
| + | ==Minerve2 GEANT 4.10.1 Xterm error== |
| | | |
− | Then
| |
| | | |
− | : <math>\frac{-dE }{dx}= \int_0^{\infty} P(\Delta E) \Delta E</math> = energy lost by the incident particle per distance traversed through the material
| + | On OS X El Capitan V 10.11.4 using XQuartz |
| | | |
− | I am just adding up all the energy losses weighted by the probability of the energy loss to find the total energy loss.
| + | ~/src/GEANT4/geant4.10.1/Simulations/B2/B2a/exsmpleB2a |
| | | |
− | :<math>P(\Delta E) = \frac{N}{A} d \sigma =\frac{N}{A} (2 \pi b db) Z</math> : classically <math>\sigma = \pi b^2 ; d \sigma = 2\pi b db
| + | <pre> |
− | </math>
| |
| | | |
− | : <math>\Rightarrow \frac{-dE}{dx} = \int_0^{\infty} \frac{N}{A} (2 \pi b db) Z \Delta E = \frac{2 \pi N Z}{A} \int_0^{\infty} \Delta E b db</math> | + | # Use this open statement to create an OpenGL view: |
− | = <math>\frac{2 \pi N Z}{A} \int_0^{\infty} \left [ \frac{2 r_e^2 m_e c^2 z^2}{\beta^2 b^2}\right ] b db</math>
| + | /vis/open OGL 600x600-0+0 |
− | := <math>4 \pi N r_e^2 m_e c^2 \frac{z^2 Z}{A \beta^2} \int_0^{\infty} \frac{db}{b}</math> | + | /vis/sceneHandler/create OGL |
| + | /vis/viewer/create ! ! 600x600-0+0 |
| + | libGL error: failed to load driver: swrast |
| + | X Error of failed request: BadValue (integer parameter out of range for operation) |
| + | Major opcode of failed request: 150 (GLX) |
| + | Minor opcode of failed request: 3 (X_GLXCreateContext) |
| + | Value in failed request: 0x0 |
| + | Serial number of failed request: 25 |
| + | Current serial number in output stream: 26 |
| + | </pre> |
| | | |
− | ====Bethe-Bloch Equation ====
| |
| | | |
− | === Energy Straggling ===
| |
− | ==== Thick Absorber ====
| |
− | ====Thin Absorbers====
| |
− | === Range Straggling===
| |
− | === Electron Capture and Loss ===
| |
− | === Multiple Scattering ===
| |
| | | |
− | == Interactions of Electrons and Photons with Matter==
| |
− | === Bremsstrahlung===
| |
− | === Photo-electric effect===
| |
− | === Compton Scattering ===
| |
− | === Pair Production ===
| |
| | | |
− | == Hadronic Interactions ==
| |
− | === Neutron Interactions ===
| |
− | ==== Elastic scattering====
| |
| | | |
− | ==== Inelasstic Scattering====
| + | [[TF_SPIM_OLD]] |