Difference between revisions of "Thesis"
| Line 55: | Line 55: | ||
=Experimental Methods= | =Experimental Methods= | ||
==[[Linac Run Plan April 2018, Dr. McNulty]]== | ==[[Linac Run Plan April 2018, Dr. McNulty]]== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Nothing below is final and will be changed. | ||
| + | |||
| + | =Date= | ||
| + | |||
| + | 85 useable OSLs | ||
| + | |||
| + | Machine: 24b Linac | ||
| + | |||
| + | Beam Energy: 8 MeV | ||
| + | |||
| + | Rep Rate: Max (180Hz)? | ||
| + | |||
| + | :{| border="2" style="text-align:center;" |cellpadding="20" cellspacing="0 | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | Shot # ||Start Time || End Time || Number of OSLs || Distance to end of beampipe || Beam Current || Aluminum Brick || Background Subtracted PMT Counts | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | 1 ||7am || 7:15am || 1 || 25cm || amps || Out || | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | 2 ||7:20am || 7:35am || 1 || 25cm || amps || Out || | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | 3 || 7:40am || 7:55am || 1 || 25cm || amps || Out || | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | 4 || 8:00 || 8:20 || 1 || 25cm || amps || Out || | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | 5 || || || 1 || 25cm || amps || Out || | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | 6 || || || 1 || 25cm || amps || In || | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | 7 || || || 1 || 25cm || amps || In || | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | 8 || || || 1 || 25cm || amps || In || | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | 9 || || || 1 || 25cm || amps || In || | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | 10 || || || 1 || 25cm || amps || In || | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | 11 || || || 10 || 25cm || amps || Out || | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | 12 || || || 10 || 25cm || amps || Out || | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | 13 || || || 10 || 25cm || amps || Out || | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | 14 || || || 10 || 25cm || amps || Out || | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | 15 || || || 10 || 25cm || amps || Out || | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | 16 || || || 10 || 25cm || amps || In || | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | 17 || || || 15 || 25cm || amps || In || | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | |} | ||
=Data Analysis= | =Data Analysis= | ||
Revision as of 19:22, 16 April 2018
Writing
Introduction
Here, we use an old machine (allegedly known as “TRIMeV”) which fires short pulses of a butt-load of tiny little particles – most likely electrons – at supersonic speeds towards a measuring apparatus which is capable of profiling the flux of these particles on a plane perpendicular to the beam by means of a bunch of tiny weird OSL thingies.
TLDR: fuck it just skip this section and dive right in!
Theory
For the sake of brevity and elegance, the reader is referred to the internet, where in due time he or she can find a fantastically large supply of papers pertaining to this study, some of which may contain content covering the necessary theory.
Related Papers/Links
see above.
TriMev_Simulations
Literally fake news.
Why does 114.5 R = 100 rad?
This is why: Roentgen to Rad Conversion. Checkmate subsection ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
Note that 1Gy = 100 Rad
Absorbed Dose Information
Apparatus
OSLs
Accelerators
TriMeV Description
Detectors
Nanodot Calibration
First Board for Beam Profile
Experimental Methods
Linac Run Plan April 2018, Dr. McNulty
Nothing below is final and will be changed.
Date
85 useable OSLs
Machine: 24b Linac
Beam Energy: 8 MeV
Rep Rate: Max (180Hz)?
Shot # Start Time End Time Number of OSLs Distance to end of beampipe Beam Current Aluminum Brick Background Subtracted PMT Counts 1 7am 7:15am 1 25cm amps Out 2 7:20am 7:35am 1 25cm amps Out 3 7:40am 7:55am 1 25cm amps Out 4 8:00 8:20 1 25cm amps Out 5 1 25cm amps Out 6 1 25cm amps In 7 1 25cm amps In 8 1 25cm amps In 9 1 25cm amps In 10 1 25cm amps In 11 10 25cm amps Out 12 10 25cm amps Out 13 10 25cm amps Out 14 10 25cm amps Out 15 10 25cm amps Out 16 10 25cm amps In 17 15 25cm amps In
Data Analysis
Nothing to say here since good data analyzes itself, and my data is good af.
OSL Reader
TriMeV Shot Log
Error Analysis
Forest Error Analysis for the Physical Sciences