Difference between revisions of "Single neutron angular distribution"

From New IAC Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(46 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
 
It was observed the angle between single neutron trajectory hitting the detector surface in different x-coordinates and incident photon direction for each of the plastic paddle detectors. This geometry is presented below:
 
It was observed the angle between single neutron trajectory hitting the detector surface in different x-coordinates and incident photon direction for each of the plastic paddle detectors. This geometry is presented below:
  
[[File:detector_layout_wrt_photon.png]]
+
[[File:detector_layout_wrt_photon2.png]]
  
 
Below each detector there is calculated (using the geometry) value of the angle between the photon beam and the neutron central trajectory hitting the detector.
 
Below each detector there is calculated (using the geometry) value of the angle between the photon beam and the neutron central trajectory hitting the detector.
  
The single neutron angular distribution for each detector extracted from the experimental data and simulation is presented below.
+
The single neutron angular distribution for each detector extracted from the experimental data and simulation is presented below. In the simulation 3E+6 neutrons were sampled from the point source placed at the positipon of the target isotropically in 4pi.
 +
 
 +
----
  
 
Detector E:
 
Detector E:
Line 20: Line 22:
 
| [[File:Simsingle_n_angle_Ewores.png|500px|Region 3]]
 
| [[File:Simsingle_n_angle_Ewores.png|500px|Region 3]]
 
|- align="center"
 
|- align="center"
| Experiment|| Simulation w/ y-resolution; Solid angle = 0.093 sr||Simulation w/o y-resolution; Solid angle = sr
+
| Experiment|| Simulation w/ y-resolution; Solid angle = 0.093 sr||Simulation w/o y-resolution; Solid angle = 0.092 sr
 
|}
 
|}
  
 +
After the normalization of simulated single neutron angular distribution (w/o y-resolution) to the total number of neutrons sampled and division of the experimental single neutron angular distribution by the normalized simulation data it was obtained the following single neutron angular distribution for Det E:
  
 +
[[File:Simsingle_n_angle_E_overnorm.png | 600px]]
 +
 +
----
  
 
Detector M:
 
Detector M:
Line 36: Line 42:
 
| [[File:Simsingle_n_angle_Mwores.png|500px|Region 3]]
 
| [[File:Simsingle_n_angle_Mwores.png|500px|Region 3]]
 
|- align="center"
 
|- align="center"
| Experiment|| Simulation w/ y-resolution; Solid angle = 0.104 sr||Simulation w/o y-resolution; Solid angle = sr
+
| Experiment|| Simulation w/ y-resolution; Solid angle = 0.104 sr||Simulation w/o y-resolution; Solid angle = 0.104 sr
 
|}
 
|}
  
 +
After the normalization of simulated single neutron angular distribution (w/o y-resolution) to the total number of neutrons sampled and division of the experimental single neutron angular distribution by the normalized simulation data it was obtained the following single neutron angular distribution for Det M:
 +
 +
[[File:Simsingle_n_angle_M_overnorm.png | 600px]]
 +
----
  
  
Line 52: Line 62:
 
| [[File:Simsingle_n_angle_Fwores.png|500px|Region 3]]
 
| [[File:Simsingle_n_angle_Fwores.png|500px|Region 3]]
 
|- align="center"
 
|- align="center"
| Experiment|| Simulation w/ y-resolution; Solid angle = 0.085 sr||Simulation w/o y-resolution; Solid angle = sr
+
| Experiment|| Simulation w/ y-resolution; Solid angle = 0.085 sr||Simulation w/o y-resolution; Solid angle = 0.086 sr
 
|}
 
|}
  
 +
After the normalization of simulated single neutron angular distribution (w/o y-resolution) to the total number of neutrons sampled and division of the experimental single neutron angular distribution by the normalized simulation data it was obtained the following single neutron angular distribution for Det F:
 +
 +
[[File:Simsingle_n_angle_F_overnorm.png | 600px]]
 +
----
  
  
Line 61: Line 75:
 
{| cellpadding="2" style="border: 1px solid darkgray;"
 
{| cellpadding="2" style="border: 1px solid darkgray;"
 
! width="400" | Experiment
 
! width="400" | Experiment
 +
! width="400" | Simulation
 
! width="400" | Simulation
 
! width="400" | Simulation
 
|- border="0"
 
|- border="0"
 
| [[File:single_n_angle_G.png|400px|Region 1]]
 
| [[File:single_n_angle_G.png|400px|Region 1]]
 
| [[File:Simsingle_n_angle_G.png|500px|Region 2]]
 
| [[File:Simsingle_n_angle_G.png|500px|Region 2]]
 +
| [[File:Simsingle_n_angle_Gwores.png|500px|Region 3]]
 
|- align="center"
 
|- align="center"
| Experiment|| Simulation w/ y-resolution; Solid angle = sr
+
| Experiment|| Simulation w/ y-resolution; Solid angle = 0.058 sr||Simulation w/o y-resolution; Solid angle = 0.057 sr
 
|}
 
|}
  
 +
After the normalization of simulated single neutron angular distribution (w/o y-resolution) to the total number of neutrons sampled and division of the experimental single neutron angular distribution by the normalized simulation data it was obtained the following single neutron angular distribution for Det G:
 +
 +
[[File:Simsingle_n_angle_G_overnorm.png | 600px]]
 +
----
  
 
Detector H:
 
Detector H:
Line 74: Line 94:
 
{| cellpadding="2" style="border: 1px solid darkgray;"
 
{| cellpadding="2" style="border: 1px solid darkgray;"
 
! width="400" | Experiment
 
! width="400" | Experiment
 +
! width="400" | Simulation
 
! width="400" | Simulation
 
! width="400" | Simulation
 
|- border="0"
 
|- border="0"
 
| [[File:single_n_angle_H.png|400px|Region 1]]
 
| [[File:single_n_angle_H.png|400px|Region 1]]
 
| [[File:Simsingle_n_angle_H.png|500px|Region 2]]
 
| [[File:Simsingle_n_angle_H.png|500px|Region 2]]
 +
| [[File:Simsingle_n_angle_Hwores.png|500px|Region 3]]
 
|- align="center"
 
|- align="center"
| Experiment|| Simulation w/ y-resolution; Solid angle = 0.023 sr
+
| Experiment|| Simulation w/ y-resolution; Solid angle = 0.023 sr||Simulation w/o y-resolution; Solid angle = 0.031 sr
 
|}
 
|}
  
 +
After the normalization of simulated single neutron angular distribution (w/o y-resolution) to the total number of neutrons sampled and division of the experimental single neutron angular distribution by the normalized simulation data it was obtained the following single neutron angular distribution for Det H:
  
 +
[[File:Simsingle_n_angle_H_overnorm.png | 600px]]
 +
 +
----
  
  
Line 89: Line 115:
 
{| cellpadding="2" style="border: 1px solid darkgray;"
 
{| cellpadding="2" style="border: 1px solid darkgray;"
 
! width="400" | Experiment
 
! width="400" | Experiment
 +
! width="400" | Simulation
 
! width="400" | Simulation
 
! width="400" | Simulation
 
|- border="0"
 
|- border="0"
 
| [[File:single_n_angle_K.png|400px|Region 1]]
 
| [[File:single_n_angle_K.png|400px|Region 1]]
 
| [[File:Simsingle_n_angle_K.png|500px|Region 2]]
 
| [[File:Simsingle_n_angle_K.png|500px|Region 2]]
 +
| [[File:Simsingle_n_angle_Kwores.png|500px|Region 3]]
 
|- align="center"
 
|- align="center"
| Experiment|| Simulation w/ y-resolution; Solid angle = 0.018 sr
+
| Experiment|| Simulation w/ y-resolution; Solid angle = 0.018 sr||Simulation w/o y-resolution; Solid angle = 0.018 sr
 
|}
 
|}
 +
 +
After the normalization of simulated single neutron angular distribution (w/o y-resolution) to the total number of neutrons sampled and division of the experimental single neutron angular distribution by the normalized simulation data it was obtained the following single neutron angular distribution for Det K:
 +
 +
[[File:Simsingle_n_angle_K_overnorm.png | 600px]]
 +
----
  
  
Line 102: Line 135:
 
{| cellpadding="2" style="border: 1px solid darkgray;"
 
{| cellpadding="2" style="border: 1px solid darkgray;"
 
! width="400" | Experiment
 
! width="400" | Experiment
 +
! width="400" | Simulation
 
! width="400" | Simulation
 
! width="400" | Simulation
 
|- border="0"
 
|- border="0"
 
| [[File:single_n_angle_I.png|400px|Region 1]]
 
| [[File:single_n_angle_I.png|400px|Region 1]]
 
| [[File:Simsingle_n_angle_I.png|500px|Region 2]]
 
| [[File:Simsingle_n_angle_I.png|500px|Region 2]]
 +
| [[File:Simsingle_n_angle_Iwores.png|500px|Region 3]]
 
|- align="center"
 
|- align="center"
| Experiment|| Simulation w/ y-resolution; Solid angle = 0.011 sr
+
| Experiment|| Simulation w/ y-resolution; Solid angle = 0.011 sr||Simulation w/o y-resolution; Solid angle = 0.011 sr
 
|}
 
|}
 +
 +
After the normalization of simulated single neutron angular distribution (w/o y-resolution) to the total number of neutrons sampled and division of the experimental single neutron angular distribution by the normalized simulation data it was obtained the following single neutron angular distribution for Det I:
 +
 +
[[File:Simsingle_n_angle_I_overnorm.png | 600px]]
 +
 +
As can be seen there is no overlap in the single neutron angular distributions for the neutron detectors and the normalization of simulated single neutron angular distribution (w/o y-resolution) to the total number of neutrons sampled and division of the experimental single neutron angular distribution by the normalized simulation data shows that the angular distribution is close to be flat for all the neutron detectors.
 +
 +
 +
[[File:All_in_one_scale.png | 600px]]
 +
 +
==Single neutron energy spectra==
 +
 +
Det E
 +
 +
[[File:adjusted_tof_spectra_detE.png | 500px]]
 +
 +
[[File:adjusted_SUMtof_spectra_detE.png | 500px]]
 +
 +
[[File:xcoordinate_spectra_detE.png | 500px]]
 +
 +
[[File:neutronE_spectra_detE.png | 500px]]
 +
 +
Det F
 +
 +
[[File:adjusted_tof_spectra_detF.png | 500px]]
 +
 +
[[File:adjusted_SUMtof_spectra_detF.png | 500px]]
 +
 +
[[File:xcoordinate_spectra_detF.png | 500px]]
 +
 +
[[File:neutronE_spectra_detF.png | 500px]]
 +
 +
===Single neutron energy bank===
 +
 +
After processing of all data obtained via the rest of the detectors the following single neutron energy spectra were obtained:
 +
 +
[[File:nene_spectra_databank.png | 700px]]
 +
 +
==Relative detection efficiency==
 +
 +
The relative neutron detection efficiency was calculated in the following way. Det H was chosen to be the reference detector. The neutron energy spectra were binned and the ratio of the neutron number detected by the neutron detector under consideration to the neutron number detected by Det H was calculated for the specific neutron energy bin. Also a cut at 1 MeV was applied to remove the noise in the neutron energy spectra.
 +
 +
So the relative efficiency plot should be understood as follows: the dots on the plots represent the high energy cut value and the full energy range where the number of single neutrons was counted is from 1 MeV up to the point on the plot.
 +
 +
Error bars in the relative efficiency plots represent propagated statistical uncertainties on the neutron number in the specific energy range.
 +
 +
[[File:ndetection_effcy_relDetH.png | 700px]]
 +
 +
When the minimum neutron energy was changed from 1 MeV to 2 then the relative neutron detection efficiency had the following neutron energy dependence:
  
  
As can be seen there is no overlap in the single neutron angular distributions for the neutron detectors.
+
[[File:ndetection_effcy_relDetH2_20range.png | 700px]]

Latest revision as of 20:43, 20 September 2013

The data on the single neutron angular distribution were extracted from the experimental data. All production runs with DU target were processed.

It was observed the angle between single neutron trajectory hitting the detector surface in different x-coordinates and incident photon direction for each of the plastic paddle detectors. This geometry is presented below:

Detector layout wrt photon2.png

Below each detector there is calculated (using the geometry) value of the angle between the photon beam and the neutron central trajectory hitting the detector.

The single neutron angular distribution for each detector extracted from the experimental data and simulation is presented below. In the simulation 3E+6 neutrons were sampled from the point source placed at the positipon of the target isotropically in 4pi.


Detector E:

Experiment Simulation Simulation
Region 1 Region 2 Region 3
Experiment Simulation w/ y-resolution; Solid angle = 0.093 sr Simulation w/o y-resolution; Solid angle = 0.092 sr

After the normalization of simulated single neutron angular distribution (w/o y-resolution) to the total number of neutrons sampled and division of the experimental single neutron angular distribution by the normalized simulation data it was obtained the following single neutron angular distribution for Det E:

Simsingle n angle E overnorm.png


Detector M:

Experiment Simulation Simulation
Region 1 Region 2 Region 3
Experiment Simulation w/ y-resolution; Solid angle = 0.104 sr Simulation w/o y-resolution; Solid angle = 0.104 sr

After the normalization of simulated single neutron angular distribution (w/o y-resolution) to the total number of neutrons sampled and division of the experimental single neutron angular distribution by the normalized simulation data it was obtained the following single neutron angular distribution for Det M:

Simsingle n angle M overnorm.png



Detector F:

Experiment Simulation Simulation
Region 1 Region 2 Region 3
Experiment Simulation w/ y-resolution; Solid angle = 0.085 sr Simulation w/o y-resolution; Solid angle = 0.086 sr

After the normalization of simulated single neutron angular distribution (w/o y-resolution) to the total number of neutrons sampled and division of the experimental single neutron angular distribution by the normalized simulation data it was obtained the following single neutron angular distribution for Det F:

Simsingle n angle F overnorm.png



Detector G:

Experiment Simulation Simulation
Region 1 Region 2 Region 3
Experiment Simulation w/ y-resolution; Solid angle = 0.058 sr Simulation w/o y-resolution; Solid angle = 0.057 sr

After the normalization of simulated single neutron angular distribution (w/o y-resolution) to the total number of neutrons sampled and division of the experimental single neutron angular distribution by the normalized simulation data it was obtained the following single neutron angular distribution for Det G:

Simsingle n angle G overnorm.png


Detector H:

Experiment Simulation Simulation
Region 1 Region 2 Region 3
Experiment Simulation w/ y-resolution; Solid angle = 0.023 sr Simulation w/o y-resolution; Solid angle = 0.031 sr

After the normalization of simulated single neutron angular distribution (w/o y-resolution) to the total number of neutrons sampled and division of the experimental single neutron angular distribution by the normalized simulation data it was obtained the following single neutron angular distribution for Det H:

Simsingle n angle H overnorm.png



Detector K:

Experiment Simulation Simulation
Region 1 Region 2 Region 3
Experiment Simulation w/ y-resolution; Solid angle = 0.018 sr Simulation w/o y-resolution; Solid angle = 0.018 sr

After the normalization of simulated single neutron angular distribution (w/o y-resolution) to the total number of neutrons sampled and division of the experimental single neutron angular distribution by the normalized simulation data it was obtained the following single neutron angular distribution for Det K:

Simsingle n angle K overnorm.png



Detector I:

Experiment Simulation Simulation
Region 1 Region 2 Region 3
Experiment Simulation w/ y-resolution; Solid angle = 0.011 sr Simulation w/o y-resolution; Solid angle = 0.011 sr

After the normalization of simulated single neutron angular distribution (w/o y-resolution) to the total number of neutrons sampled and division of the experimental single neutron angular distribution by the normalized simulation data it was obtained the following single neutron angular distribution for Det I:

Simsingle n angle I overnorm.png

As can be seen there is no overlap in the single neutron angular distributions for the neutron detectors and the normalization of simulated single neutron angular distribution (w/o y-resolution) to the total number of neutrons sampled and division of the experimental single neutron angular distribution by the normalized simulation data shows that the angular distribution is close to be flat for all the neutron detectors.


All in one scale.png

Single neutron energy spectra

Det E

Adjusted tof spectra detE.png

Adjusted SUMtof spectra detE.png

Xcoordinate spectra detE.png

NeutronE spectra detE.png

Det F

Adjusted tof spectra detF.png

Adjusted SUMtof spectra detF.png

Xcoordinate spectra detF.png

NeutronE spectra detF.png

Single neutron energy bank

After processing of all data obtained via the rest of the detectors the following single neutron energy spectra were obtained:

Nene spectra databank.png

Relative detection efficiency

The relative neutron detection efficiency was calculated in the following way. Det H was chosen to be the reference detector. The neutron energy spectra were binned and the ratio of the neutron number detected by the neutron detector under consideration to the neutron number detected by Det H was calculated for the specific neutron energy bin. Also a cut at 1 MeV was applied to remove the noise in the neutron energy spectra.

So the relative efficiency plot should be understood as follows: the dots on the plots represent the high energy cut value and the full energy range where the number of single neutrons was counted is from 1 MeV up to the point on the plot.

Error bars in the relative efficiency plots represent propagated statistical uncertainties on the neutron number in the specific energy range.

Ndetection effcy relDetH.png

When the minimum neutron energy was changed from 1 MeV to 2 then the relative neutron detection efficiency had the following neutron energy dependence:


Ndetection effcy relDetH2 20range.png