Difference between revisions of "Reproducibility Shots July 2017"
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
[[File:Shot_1_Front_Back_Y_Overlay.png|450px|thumb|center|*Unknown calibration on OSL reader]] | [[File:Shot_1_Front_Back_Y_Overlay.png|450px|thumb|center|*Unknown calibration on OSL reader]] | ||
| − | [[File: | + | [[File:Shot169%Diff.png|400px|thumb|left|*Unknown calibration on OSL reader]] |
[[File:Shot169_Current.png|400px|thumb|center|]] | [[File:Shot169_Current.png|400px|thumb|center|]] | ||
Revision as of 20:39, 1 August 2017
In this experiment, I picked 17 different points on my OSL board to test agreement between two OSLs at the same physical location for the same shot from TriMeV.
I have overlaid X and Y profiles as well as created 3D renderings of the beam profile for the front and back sets of OSLs. Note that it is flat due to the distance at which the board was placed from the end of the accelerator.
Diode diameter: 2"
Diode gap: 1.5"
Al vacuum plate thickness: 5/8"
Ta thickness: 0.020"
Distance to Board: 109 cm
Calculated amount of charge: -2.106e07 C
In this experiment, I picked 17 different points on my OSL board to test agreement between two OSLs at the same physical location for the same shot from TriMeV.
I have overlaid X and Y profiles as well as created 3D renderings of the beam profile for the front and back sets of OSLs. Note that it is flat due to the distance at which the board was placed from the end of the accelerator.
Diode diameter: 2"
gap: 2.5"
Al vacuum plate thickness: 1/8"
Ta thickness: 0.020"
Distance to Board: 102 cm
Calculated amount of charge: -1.679E07
