Difference between revisions of "Reproducibility Shots July 2017"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
Distance to Board: 109 cm | Distance to Board: 109 cm | ||
| + | |||
| + | Calculated amount of charge: -2.106e07 C | ||
[[File:Shot 1 Front Jul2017.png|400px|thumb|left|*Unknown calibration on OSL reader]] | [[File:Shot 1 Front Jul2017.png|400px|thumb|left|*Unknown calibration on OSL reader]] | ||
| Line 25: | Line 27: | ||
[[File:TriMeV Reproducibility Shot1 07-2017.png|400px|thumb|left|*Unknown calibration on OSL reader]] | [[File:TriMeV Reproducibility Shot1 07-2017.png|400px|thumb|left|*Unknown calibration on OSL reader]] | ||
| − | + | [[File:TriMeV Shot169_Current.png|400px|thumb|center|]] | |
[[TriMeV Shot Log]] | [[TriMeV Shot Log]] | ||
Revision as of 18:44, 28 July 2017
Shot 169
In this experiment, I picked 17 different points on my OSL board to test agreement between two OSLs at the same physical location for the same shot from TriMeV.
I have overlaid X and Y profiles as well as created 3D renderings of the beam profile for the front and back sets of OSLs. Note that it is flat due to the distance at which the board was placed from the end of the accelerator.
Diode diameter: 2"
Diode gap: 1.5"
Al vacuum plate thickness: 5/8"
Ta thickness: 0.020"
Distance to Board: 109 cm
Calculated amount of charge: -2.106e07 C
