Difference between revisions of "R3833 Efficiency1"

From New IAC Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 8: Line 8:
 
[[File:r3833_1WireHitsRow-vs-Column.png | 200 px]]
 
[[File:r3833_1WireHitsRow-vs-Column.png | 200 px]]
  
Most of the hits are in row 9 (I was only looking at 16 sense wires)
+
Most of the hits are in row 9.
  
  
Line 18: Line 18:
  
 
[[File:r3833_1WireHitsCol9N.png | 200 px]]
 
[[File:r3833_1WireHitsCol9N.png | 200 px]]
 +
 +
 +
If I now require that Wires 1-3 and 5-6 from column 9 have hits and then ask how many hits did wire 4 have I get an efficiency of about 98%.
 +
 +
[[File:r3833_1WireHitsCol9n5wires.png | 200 px]]
 +
 +
 +
Using run 3834, the efficiency increase to 99% when the discriminator is increased from -30 mV to -60 mV
 +
 +
[[File:r3834_1WireHitsCol9n5wires.png | 200 px]]
 +
  
 
[[CLAS12_R1_S1_QA]]
 
[[CLAS12_R1_S1_QA]]

Latest revision as of 21:01, 7 March 2013

My first attempt at an efficiency measurement compares wire hits when you require that the first (wire 1) and last (wire 6) wires in a single super layer are hit.

First I looked at which wires were hit when I require that there is a hit on wire 1 and wire 2.

HV was G:F:S = 536:-750:1500 Volts


R3833 1WireHitsRow-vs-Column.png

Most of the hits are in row 9.


If I histogram all wire hits requiring a hit in both wire 1, wire 6 and row 9 I see the following

R3833 1WireHitsCol9.png

Now I divide by the number of hits seen by both wire 1 and wire 6

R3833 1WireHitsCol9N.png


If I now require that Wires 1-3 and 5-6 from column 9 have hits and then ask how many hits did wire 4 have I get an efficiency of about 98%.

R3833 1WireHitsCol9n5wires.png


Using run 3834, the efficiency increase to 99% when the discriminator is increased from -30 mV to -60 mV

R3834 1WireHitsCol9n5wires.png


CLAS12_R1_S1_QA