Difference between revisions of "R3833 Efficiency1"

From New IAC Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with " My first attempt at an efficiency measurement compares wire hits when you require that the first (wire 1) and last (wire 6) wires in a single super layer are hit. First I looke…")
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
 
My first attempt at an efficiency measurement compares wire hits when you require that the first (wire 1) and last (wire 6) wires in a single super layer are hit.
 
My first attempt at an efficiency measurement compares wire hits when you require that the first (wire 1) and last (wire 6) wires in a single super layer are hit.
  
 
First I looked at which wires were hit when I require that there is a hit on wire 1 and wire 2.
 
First I looked at which wires were hit when I require that there is a hit on wire 1 and wire 2.
 +
 +
HV was G:F:S = 536:-750:1500 Volts
  
  

Revision as of 00:34, 7 March 2013

My first attempt at an efficiency measurement compares wire hits when you require that the first (wire 1) and last (wire 6) wires in a single super layer are hit.

First I looked at which wires were hit when I require that there is a hit on wire 1 and wire 2.

HV was G:F:S = 536:-750:1500 Volts


R3833 1WireHitsRow-vs-Column.png

Most of the hits are in row 9 (I was only looking at 16 sense wires)


If I histogram all wire hits requiring a hit in both wire 1, wire 6 and row 9 I see the following

R3833 1WireHitsCol9.png

Now I divide by the number of hits seen by both wire 1 and wire 6

R3833 1WireHitsCol9N.png

CLAS12_R1_S1_QA