Difference between revisions of "Physics2017 SRP"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
#Compare the number of full time faculty in peer institutions (ISU=6, average of peer institutions=13) | #Compare the number of full time faculty in peer institutions (ISU=6, average of peer institutions=13) | ||
#delineate how the reduction in faculty has prevented regular faculty rotations through courses offered by the program, faculty are needed in upper division courses | #delineate how the reduction in faculty has prevented regular faculty rotations through courses offered by the program, faculty are needed in upper division courses | ||
| − | + | #larger class sizes are needed due to the limited number of physics faculty | |
#Identify currently faculty that are willing to assume the responsibilities of a Department Chair | #Identify currently faculty that are willing to assume the responsibilities of a Department Chair | ||
Revision as of 22:12, 6 April 2017
Physics Short Range Plan
Goals
Create a 1-2 page document that advocates the hiring of new physics faculty at the associates level.
Outline Arguments
- Compare Department performance in 2009 to current performance showing the impact of having a department with more than 6 faculty
- Compare the number of full time faculty in peer institutions (ISU=6, average of peer institutions=13)
- delineate how the reduction in faculty has prevented regular faculty rotations through courses offered by the program, faculty are needed in upper division courses
- larger class sizes are needed due to the limited number of physics faculty
- Identify currently faculty that are willing to assume the responsibilities of a Department Chair