Difference between revisions of "Optimization of Positron Capturing"

From New IAC Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 4: Line 4:
 
= Optimization with ELEGANT Simulation on the Region from Gun Exit to Tungsten Target =
 
= Optimization with ELEGANT Simulation on the Region from Gun Exit to Tungsten Target =
  
<math> \epsilon_{x,y} = 13 \mu m</math> (Not sure yet, need to be calculated)
+
Emittance: <math> \epsilon_{x,y} = 13~\mu m</math> (Not sure yet, need to be calculated)
 +
 
 +
Average Peak <math> Q = 14~pC </math>
 +
 
 +
Beam Energy: <math> 10~MeV </math>
 +
 
 +
Energy Spread: <math> \sigma_{\delta}=4.23% </math>
 +
 
 +
Alpha Function: <math> \alpha = </math>
 +
 
 +
Beta Function: <math> \beta = </math>
 +
 
 +
RMS longitudinal Bunch Length: <math> \sigma_{z} = 10.6~ps</math>

Revision as of 18:21, 14 April 2011

  • Thickness of the Tungsten target: 1.25 mm
  • Beam size at Tungsten target: Gaussian, [math]\sigma_{x,y} = 3~mm[/math]

Optimization with ELEGANT Simulation on the Region from Gun Exit to Tungsten Target

Emittance: [math] \epsilon_{x,y} = 13~\mu m[/math] (Not sure yet, need to be calculated)

Average Peak [math] Q = 14~pC [/math]

Beam Energy: [math] 10~MeV [/math]

Energy Spread: [math] \sigma_{\delta}=4.23% [/math]

Alpha Function: [math] \alpha = [/math]

Beta Function: [math] \beta = [/math]

RMS longitudinal Bunch Length: [math] \sigma_{z} = 10.6~ps[/math]