Difference between revisions of "Niowave Report 11-30-2015"

From New IAC Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 7: Line 7:
  
 
==Optimal Thickness==
 
==Optimal Thickness==
A 10 MeV electron beam with a 1cm radius uniform cylindrical spatial distribution impinges a windowless PbBi target.  The target thickness is changed to determine the optimal thickness to emmitt positrons from the downstream surface of the PbBi target.   
+
One method to produce positrons relies on the creation of positron-electron pairs from the bremsstrahlung photons that are produced when electrons traverse a dense material.  While thicker material encourages the production of these photons, the increased thickness will also cause the produced positrons to annihilate within the material before they can escape.  As a result, there is an optimal thickness which will balance the two processes to maximize positron production.  A simulation was performed to determine the optimal thickness using a 10 MeV electron beam with a 1cm radius uniform cylindrical spatial distribution impinging a windowless PbBi target.  The target thickness was changed to determine the optimal thickness to emmitt positrons from the downstream surface of the PbBi target.   
  
 
[[File:PbBi_5-1-15_Ppositron.png | 200 px]][[File:PbBi_5-1-15_Pelectron.png | 200 px]]
 
[[File:PbBi_5-1-15_Ppositron.png | 200 px]][[File:PbBi_5-1-15_Pelectron.png | 200 px]]

Revision as of 19:25, 28 November 2015

Overview

10 MeV electron beam

3.48 cm diameter beam pipe

Target optimization

Optimal Thickness

One method to produce positrons relies on the creation of positron-electron pairs from the bremsstrahlung photons that are produced when electrons traverse a dense material. While thicker material encourages the production of these photons, the increased thickness will also cause the produced positrons to annihilate within the material before they can escape. As a result, there is an optimal thickness which will balance the two processes to maximize positron production. A simulation was performed to determine the optimal thickness using a 10 MeV electron beam with a 1cm radius uniform cylindrical spatial distribution impinging a windowless PbBi target. The target thickness was changed to determine the optimal thickness to emmitt positrons from the downstream surface of the PbBi target.

PbBi 5-1-15 Ppositron.pngPbBi 5-1-15 Pelectron.png


G4Bl-vs-MCNPX 5-5-2015.png

Optimal Solenoidal Field

Beam Pipe heating

The energy deposited by electrons scattered into a 3.48 diameter stainless steel beam pipe (1.65 mm thick) from a PbBi target as a function of a uniform Solenoidal magnetic field.

The histogram is binned in 100 (10 cm) bin widths. The surface area becomes [math]10 cm \times 2 \pi 3.48/2 = 109.33 cm^2[/math]


To convert From Mev/ e- to kW/cm^2 assuming a current of 1mA (10^-3 C/s) you

[math]\left( \frac{\mbox{MeV}}{\mbox{cm}^2 \mbox{e}^-}\right) \times \left( \frac{ \mbox{e}^-}{1.6 \times 10^{-19}\mbox{C}} \right ) \times \left( \frac{1 \times 10^{-3} \mbox{C}}{\mbox{s}} \right ) \times \left( \frac{1.6 \times 10^{-13}\mbox{W} \cdot \mbox{ s}}{\mbox{MeV} }\right )[/math]

[math]\left( \frac{\mbox{keV}}{\mbox{cm}^2 \mbox{e}^-}\right) = \left( \frac{\mbox{W} }{\mbox{cm}^2 } \right )[/math]


BeamPipeDepEmev-vs-B.png BeamPipeDepPower-vs-B.png
Energy deposited (MeV) along a 1 m long beam pipe of stainless steel 1.65 mm thick.

Solenoid Description

A 10 MeV electron beam with a radius of 0.5 cm was incident on a 2 mm thick PbBi target. The target is positioned at Z = -901 mm.


TF Niowave SolenoidDesign 9-11-15.png


G4Beamline_PbBi#Reports