Difference between revisions of "Neutron Polarimeter"

From New IAC Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(28 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
[http://wiki.iac.isu.edu/index.php/PhotoFission_with_Polarized_Photons_from_HRRL Go Back]
+
[https://wiki.iac.isu.edu/index.php/Roman_calculation Go Back]
  
  
 
= Four-vector Algebra =
 
= Four-vector Algebra =
  
Consider two bode reaction <math>D(\gamma, n)p</math>:
+
Consider two body reaction <math>D(\gamma, n)p</math>:
  
 
[[File:Collision01.png | 450 px]]
 
[[File:Collision01.png | 450 px]]
Line 55: Line 55:
  
  
1) from formula [1] above we can predict the threshold of <math>^2D(n,\gamma)</math> reaction in  <math>\Theta_n = 90^o</math> direction:
+
1) from formula [1] above we can predict the threshold of <math>^2D(\gamma, n)</math> reaction in  <math>\Theta_n = 90^o</math> direction:
  
 
  <math>E_{\gamma} = 1.715\ MeV</math>
 
  <math>E_{\gamma} = 1.715\ MeV</math>
 +
 +
comment: it's not true because by momentum conservation there are no neutron with zero kinetic energy.
  
 
2) from formula [1] above we can predict the incident photon energy based on the detected neutron energy (neutron polarimeter).
 
2) from formula [1] above we can predict the incident photon energy based on the detected neutron energy (neutron polarimeter).
 
[[File:Tgamma03.png | 1000 px]]
 
  
 
3) from formula [2] above we can predict the detected neutron energy based on the incident photon energy.
 
3) from formula [2] above we can predict the detected neutron energy based on the incident photon energy.
Line 73: Line 73:
 
=Example of error calculation=
 
=Example of error calculation=
  
==example 1==
+
==simple error calculation==
  
 
Say, we have, 10 MeV neutron with uncertainty 1 MeV,
 
Say, we have, 10 MeV neutron with uncertainty 1 MeV,
Line 80: Line 80:
 
  <math> \delta T_{\gamma} = 2.003\ \delta T_n = 2.003\times 1\ MeV = 2.003\ MeV </math>
 
  <math> \delta T_{\gamma} = 2.003\ \delta T_n = 2.003\times 1\ MeV = 2.003\ MeV </math>
  
==example 2==
+
==photon kinetic energy error <math>\delta T_{\gamma}</math> as function of TOF uncertainty <math>\delta t</math>==
  
 
In the calculations below I attempted to predict the uncertainty in photons energy based on uncertainty in neutrons time of flight.
 
In the calculations below I attempted to predict the uncertainty in photons energy based on uncertainty in neutrons time of flight.
Line 94: Line 94:
 
  <math>\delta T_n \left(\delta t\right) = -\ \frac{m\ l^2}{\left(1-\left(\frac{l}{c\ t}\right)^2\right)^{3/2}c^2 t^3} \cdot  \delta t</math>
 
  <math>\delta T_n \left(\delta t\right) = -\ \frac{m\ l^2}{\left(1-\left(\frac{l}{c\ t}\right)^2\right)^{3/2}c^2 t^3} \cdot  \delta t</math>
  
In the formula for <math>\delta t</math> we also need to know the neutron time of flight which is:
+
In that formula for <math>\delta T_n</math> we need to know the neutron time of flight which is:
  
 
  <math>t:=\frac{l}{c\ \beta_n} = \frac{l}{c\ (p_n/E_n)} =
 
  <math>t:=\frac{l}{c\ \beta_n} = \frac{l}{c\ (p_n/E_n)} =
Line 102: Line 102:
 
And now we can calculate the relative error for photon energy using the formula derived before:
 
And now we can calculate the relative error for photon energy using the formula derived before:
  
  <math>T_{\gamma}\ [MeV] = 2.003\ T_n\ [MeV] + 1.715\ [MeV]\ \ \ \ [1]</math>
+
  <math>\delta T_{\gamma} = 2.003\ \delta T_n</math>
 +
 
  
  
Line 109: Line 110:
 
  <math>\delta t = 1\ ns</math>
 
  <math>\delta t = 1\ ns</math>
  
 +
And below are y numerical calculations and plot with error bars:
  
In the table below are presented some calculation results using the formulas above:
+
[[File:table_1ns.png | 800 px]]
  
[[File:Error table01.png | 1100 px]]
+
And in the plot below I have overlay my error calculations using the formulas above:
  
 +
[[File:Tgamma_1ns_01.png | 900 px]]
  
  
And in the plot below I have overlay my error calculations using the formulas above:
 
  
[[File:Tgamma error01.png | 1000 px]]
+
Now say, the detector is 1.5 m away and neutron's time of flight uncertainty is:
 +
 
 +
<math>\delta t = 3\ ns</math>
 +
 
 +
[[File:table_3ns.png | 800 px]]
 +
 
 +
[[File:Tgamma_3ns_01.png | 900 px]]
 +
 
 +
=<math>\Theta</math>  dependence=
 +
 
 +
Starting from general kinematic relations:
 +
 
 +
<math> m_p^2 = m_D^2 + m_n^2 +  2T_{\gamma}\cdot m_D  - 2m_D\cdot E_n - 2\left( T_{\gamma}E_n - T_{\gamma}p_n\cos\Theta_n\right) </math>
 +
 
 +
we can solve the equation above with respect to <math>T_{\gamma}</math> as function of neutron energy <math>T_n</math> and neutron angle <math>\Theta_n</math>
 
   
 
   
 +
<math>T_{\gamma} = \frac{m_p^2-m_n^2-m_D^2+2m_D E_n}{2(m_D-E_n-p_n\cos\Theta_n)}</math>
 +
 +
and using
 +
 +
<math>E_n = T_n+m_n</math>
 +
<math>p_n = \sqrt{E_n^2-m_n^2} = \sqrt{T_n^2+2T_n m_n}</math>
 +
 +
finally
 +
 +
<math>T_{\gamma} = \frac{m_p^2-m_n^2-m_D^2+2m_D (T_n+m_n)}{2\left(m_D-m_n-T_n-\sqrt{T_n^2+2T_n m_n}\cos\Theta_n\right)}</math>
 +
 +
 +
 +
Let's do some plots using the equation derived above. Below is presented the photon energy as function of neutron angle for several values of neutron energy:
 +
 +
 +
[[File:Tgamma_angle.png | 900 px]]
 +
 +
  
 +
And below are the photon energy as function of neutron angle and neutron energy:
  
  
 +
[[File:Tgamma_3D_01.png | 900 px]]
  
  
  
 
[http://wiki.iac.isu.edu/index.php/PhotoFission_with_Polarized_Photons_from_HRRL Go Back]
 
[http://wiki.iac.isu.edu/index.php/PhotoFission_with_Polarized_Photons_from_HRRL Go Back]

Latest revision as of 05:17, 27 February 2013

Go Back


Four-vector Algebra

Consider two body reaction [math]D(\gamma, n)p[/math]:

Collision01.png


Write down four-momentum vectors before and after reaction:

[math] p_{\gamma} = \left( T_{\gamma},\ T_{\gamma},\ 0,\ 0  \right) [/math] 
[math] p_D     = \left( m_D,\ 0,\ 0,\ 0  \right) [/math] 
[math] p_{n} = \left( E_n,\ \ p_n\cos \Theta_n,\ \ p_n\sin \Theta_n,\ \ 0  \right) [/math] 
[math] p_{p} = \left( E_p,\ \ p_p\cos \Theta_p,\ \ p_p\sin \Theta_p,\ \ 0  \right) [/math] 

Now apply the law of conservation of four-momentum vectors:

[math] p^{\mu}_{\gamma} + p^{\mu}_D = p^{\mu}_p + p^{\mu}_n\ \ \Rightarrow \ \  p^{\mu}_p = p^{\mu}_{\gamma} + p^{\mu}_D - p^{\mu}_n[/math]

Squaring both side of equation above and using the four-momentum invariants [math](p^{\mu})^2 = m^2[/math] we have:

[math] m_p^2 = m_D^2 + m_n^2 +  2T_{\gamma}\cdot m_D  - 2m_D\cdot E_n - 2\left( T_{\gamma}E_n - T_{\gamma}p_n\cos\Theta_n\right) [/math]

Detector located at [math]\Theta = 90^o[/math] case

Detector is located at [math]\Theta_n = 90^o[/math], and the formula above is simplified:

[math] m_p^2 = m_D^2 + m_n^2 +  2\ T_{\gamma}\cdot m_D  - 2\ m_D\cdot E_n - 2\ T_{\gamma}E_n [/math]


We can easily solve the equation above with respect to incident photon energy:

[math]T_{\gamma} = \frac {m_p^2 - m_n^2 - m_D^2 + 2\ m_D E_n}{2\ (m_D - E_n)}
                  = \frac {m_p^2 - m_n^2 - m_D^2 + 2\ m_D (T_n+m_n)}{2\ (m_D - (T_n+m_n))} [/math]


For non-relativistic neutrons [math]T_n \ll m_n = 939.5\ MeV[/math] and the formula above is become:

[math]T_{\gamma} = \frac {m_p^2 - m_n^2 - m_D^2 + 2\ m_D m_n + 2\ m_D T_n}{2\ (m_D - m_n)} [/math]


Substituting the corresponding masses, we get finally:

[math]T_{\gamma}\ [MeV] = 2.003\ T_n\ [MeV] + 1.715\ [MeV]\ \ \ \ [1][/math]

and visa versa:

[math]T_n\ [MeV] = 0.499\cdot T_{\gamma}\ [MeV] - 0.856\ [MeV]\ \ \ \ [2][/math]


Here I derived the formula [2] just inversing the formula [1]. I can as well start from exact solution above, solve this equation with respect to neutron energy, do the non-relativistic approximation and get exactly the same formula [2]. But anyway we ended up with two useful non-relativistic formulas we can analyze now:


1) from formula [1] above we can predict the threshold of [math]^2D(\gamma, n)[/math] reaction in [math]\Theta_n = 90^o[/math] direction:

[math]E_{\gamma} = 1.715\ MeV[/math]

comment: it's not true because by momentum conservation there are no neutron with zero kinetic energy.

2) from formula [1] above we can predict the incident photon energy based on the detected neutron energy (neutron polarimeter).

3) from formula [2] above we can predict the detected neutron energy based on the incident photon energy.

 -  for the incident photons up to [math]25\ MeV[/math] we can detect neutrons up to  [math]11.62\ MeV[/math]
 -  for the incident photons up to [math]44\ MeV[/math] we can detect neutrons up to  [math]21.10\ MeV[/math]

4) we can do the error calculations.

Example of error calculation

simple error calculation

Say, we have, 10 MeV neutron with uncertainty 1 MeV, the corresponding uncertainly for photons energy is:

[math] \delta T_{\gamma} = 2.003\ \delta T_n = 2.003\times 1\ MeV = 2.003\ MeV [/math]

photon kinetic energy error [math]\delta T_{\gamma}[/math] as function of TOF uncertainty [math]\delta t[/math]

In the calculations below I attempted to predict the uncertainty in photons energy based on uncertainty in neutrons time of flight.


The neutron kinetic energy as function of time of flight is:

[math]T_n = m_n (\gamma - 1) = m_n\left[ \frac{1}{\sqrt{1-\left(\frac{l}{c\ t}\right)^2}} - 1 \right][/math]

By taking derivative of the expression above we can find the relative error for neutron energy:

[math]\delta T_n \left(\delta t\right) = -\ \frac{m\ l^2}{\left(1-\left(\frac{l}{c\ t}\right)^2\right)^{3/2}c^2 t^3} \cdot  \delta t[/math]

In that formula for [math]\delta T_n[/math] we need to know the neutron time of flight which is:

[math]t:=\frac{l}{c\ \beta_n} = \frac{l}{c\ (p_n/E_n)} =
         \frac{l\ (T_n + m_n)}{c\sqrt{T_n^2+2m_nT_n}}[/math]


And now we can calculate the relative error for photon energy using the formula derived before:

[math]\delta T_{\gamma} = 2.003\ \delta T_n[/math]


Say, the detector is 1.5 m away and neutron's time of flight uncertainty is:

[math]\delta t = 1\ ns[/math]

And below are y numerical calculations and plot with error bars:

Table 1ns.png

And in the plot below I have overlay my error calculations using the formulas above:

Tgamma 1ns 01.png


Now say, the detector is 1.5 m away and neutron's time of flight uncertainty is:

[math]\delta t = 3\ ns[/math]

Table 3ns.png

Tgamma 3ns 01.png

[math]\Theta[/math] dependence

Starting from general kinematic relations:

[math] m_p^2 = m_D^2 + m_n^2 +  2T_{\gamma}\cdot m_D  - 2m_D\cdot E_n - 2\left( T_{\gamma}E_n - T_{\gamma}p_n\cos\Theta_n\right) [/math]

we can solve the equation above with respect to [math]T_{\gamma}[/math] as function of neutron energy [math]T_n[/math] and neutron angle [math]\Theta_n[/math]

[math]T_{\gamma} = \frac{m_p^2-m_n^2-m_D^2+2m_D E_n}{2(m_D-E_n-p_n\cos\Theta_n)}[/math]

and using

[math]E_n = T_n+m_n[/math]
[math]p_n = \sqrt{E_n^2-m_n^2} = \sqrt{T_n^2+2T_n m_n}[/math]

finally

[math]T_{\gamma} = \frac{m_p^2-m_n^2-m_D^2+2m_D (T_n+m_n)}{2\left(m_D-m_n-T_n-\sqrt{T_n^2+2T_n m_n}\cos\Theta_n\right)}[/math]


Let's do some plots using the equation derived above. Below is presented the photon energy as function of neutron angle for several values of neutron energy:


Tgamma angle.png


And below are the photon energy as function of neutron angle and neutron energy:


Tgamma 3D 01.png


Go Back