Difference between revisions of "June, 7, 2007 Cf rate measurements using Photonics PMT"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
{| border="5" | {| border="5" | ||
| − | ! Configuration || Rate (counts/min) | + | ! Configuration || Rate (counts/min) || Error in Rate (Counts/min) |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | 1 || 0 || | + | | 1 || 0 || 0 |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | 2 || 0 | + | | 2 || 0 || 0 |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | 3 || 0 | + | | 3 || 0 || 0 |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | 4 || 0 | + | | 4 || 0 || 0 |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | 5 || 0 | + | | 5 || 0 || 0 |
|} | |} | ||
Revision as of 21:19, 7 June 2007
Cf source was placed X cm away from face of PHotonics PMT. The PMT output signal was descriminated by a Lecroy Model # YYY descriminator set to pass any voltage below -0.5 mV. The descriminated output was then sent to a scaler Model ####.
Configuration Definitions
1: Placed the Cf source ## cm from face of Scintillator. neutrons passing through scintillator would also pass through PMT
2: Inserted a ### cm thick steel shielding wall between Scintillator and Cf source. Right up against Scintillator
3: Replaced steel wall with ### cm thick lead shielding brick
4: Replaced lead brick with ### cm thick parafin block
5: Increased thickness of parafin block to #### cm
| Configuration | Rate (counts/min) | Error in Rate (Counts/min) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 2 | 0 | 0 |
| 3 | 0 | 0 |
| 4 | 0 | 0 |
| 5 | 0 | 0 |