Difference between revisions of "June, 6, 2007 Scintillator Signals from source"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | Today Oleksiy, Tamuna, and Tony looked at the scintillator response to a Californium (< | + | Today Oleksiy, Tamuna, and Tony looked at the scintillator response to a Californium (<sup>252</sup>Cf) neutron source. Two types of PMTs were used each with different scintillators. PMTs were (i) ORTEC 266 and (ii) PHOTONIS VD 119. A voltage of 700 Volts (the base drew 500 <math>\mu</math>A) was applied to the ORTEC PMT and 1200 Volts (the base drew 800 <math>\mu</math>A)to the Photonis. |
The Cf-252 was placed first at the distance ~0 cm to the front edge of scintillators. (i) Signal amplitude was ~8 mV at the threshold set on the oscilloscope 2.4 mV. (ii) Signal amplitude was ~20 mV. | The Cf-252 was placed first at the distance ~0 cm to the front edge of scintillators. (i) Signal amplitude was ~8 mV at the threshold set on the oscilloscope 2.4 mV. (ii) Signal amplitude was ~20 mV. |
Revision as of 16:59, 7 June 2007
Today Oleksiy, Tamuna, and Tony looked at the scintillator response to a Californium (252Cf) neutron source. Two types of PMTs were used each with different scintillators. PMTs were (i) ORTEC 266 and (ii) PHOTONIS VD 119. A voltage of 700 Volts (the base drew 500
A) was applied to the ORTEC PMT and 1200 Volts (the base drew 800 A)to the Photonis.The Cf-252 was placed first at the distance ~0 cm to the front edge of scintillators. (i) Signal amplitude was ~8 mV at the threshold set on the oscilloscope 2.4 mV. (ii) Signal amplitude was ~20 mV.
In the case the distance between Cf-252 and scintillators was ~3 m we had only cosmic rays events in both channels.
Material of scintillator used in case (i) was BC-420.
Our next step is to install a scaler and attempt to measure rates.