Difference between revisions of "June, 6, 2007 Scintillator Signals from source"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | Today Oleksiy, Tamuna, and Tony looked at the scintillator response to a californium neutron source. | + | Today Oleksiy, Tamuna, and Tony looked at the scintillator response to a californium neutron source. Two types of PMTs were use each with different scintillators. PMTs were (i) ORTEC 266 and (ii) PHOTONIS VD 119. A voltage of 700 Volts (the base drew 500 <math>\mu</math>A) was applied to the ORTEC PMT and 1200 Volts (the base drew 800 <math>\mu</math>A)to the PhotonisuA. |
The Cf-252 was placed first at the distance ~0 cm to the front edge of scintillators. (i) Signal amplitude was ~8 mV at the threshold set on the oscilloscope 2.4 mV. (ii) Signal amplitude was ~20 mV. | The Cf-252 was placed first at the distance ~0 cm to the front edge of scintillators. (i) Signal amplitude was ~8 mV at the threshold set on the oscilloscope 2.4 mV. (ii) Signal amplitude was ~20 mV. | ||
Revision as of 23:31, 6 June 2007
Today Oleksiy, Tamuna, and Tony looked at the scintillator response to a californium neutron source. Two types of PMTs were use each with different scintillators. PMTs were (i) ORTEC 266 and (ii) PHOTONIS VD 119. A voltage of 700 Volts (the base drew 500 A) was applied to the ORTEC PMT and 1200 Volts (the base drew 800 A)to the PhotonisuA.
The Cf-252 was placed first at the distance ~0 cm to the front edge of scintillators. (i) Signal amplitude was ~8 mV at the threshold set on the oscilloscope 2.4 mV. (ii) Signal amplitude was ~20 mV.
In the case the distance between Cf-252 and scintillators was ~3 m we had only cosmic rays events in both channels.
Material of scintillator used in case (i) was BC-420.
To be continued...