Difference between revisions of "July 6, 2007 Neutron Capture in lead"

From New IAC Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 9: Line 9:
 
We have sharp peak on 803 keV, which is the result of the lead container. This line coressponds to thermal-neutron capture in lead Pb-206.[http://prola.aps.org/pdf/PR/v95/i6/p1482_1]. However, 388 kev and 333 kev, energy lines of Cf-249 are more dominant without lead.<br>
 
We have sharp peak on 803 keV, which is the result of the lead container. This line coressponds to thermal-neutron capture in lead Pb-206.[http://prola.aps.org/pdf/PR/v95/i6/p1482_1]. However, 388 kev and 333 kev, energy lines of Cf-249 are more dominant without lead.<br>
 
For energy line 803 keV    ( # of counts without lead / # of count with  lead ) =0.5
 
For energy line 803 keV    ( # of counts without lead / # of count with  lead ) =0.5
 +
 +
[http://arxiv.org/abs/0707.3679 (n,<math>\gamma) from Pb-206 from 1 ev to 600 keV</math>]

Latest revision as of 14:20, 26 July 2007

Paraffin wax layer of thickness 12.6 cm was used as a neutron attenuator and for cosmic rays lead of thickness 10 cm on sides of HpGe detector. The source was Cf-252 without and with lead container of 60μCi activity.

1. Energy Region 100-500 keV

With lead without CF 252 gamma spectra100 500.jpg

2. Energy Region 500-900 keV

With lead without CF 252 gamma spectra500 900.jpg
We have sharp peak on 803 keV, which is the result of the lead container. This line coressponds to thermal-neutron capture in lead Pb-206.[1]. However, 388 kev and 333 kev, energy lines of Cf-249 are more dominant without lead.
For energy line 803 keV ( # of counts without lead / # of count with lead ) =0.5

(n,[math]\gamma) from Pb-206 from 1 ev to 600 keV[/math]