Difference between revisions of "JB Absolute theta"

From New IAC Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
Line 9: Line 9:
 
[[File:D2O3DHistogram.png|700px|thumb|center|alt=Large | Every singles event lies in a three dimensional space consisting of a PMT top and bottom time, and a specific detector. These observables can be recast as energy, vertical z position, and detector angle (54,78,102, ect). ]]
 
[[File:D2O3DHistogram.png|700px|thumb|center|alt=Large | Every singles event lies in a three dimensional space consisting of a PMT top and bottom time, and a specific detector. These observables can be recast as energy, vertical z position, and detector angle (54,78,102, ect). ]]
  
The benefit of conducting the analysis in this 3D space, is that the photo-neutrons correlated with the beam can be normalized to uncorrelated Cf252 neutrons detected in the same detector with similar positions and energies.
+
The benefit of conducting the analysis in this 3D space, is that the neutrons correlated with the beam can be normalized to uncorrelated Cf252 neutrons detected in the same detector with similar positions and energies.

Latest revision as of 21:28, 22 November 2017

go_back

JB Absolute theta(oldmethod)

Analysis

After my first attempt at reconstructing the theta_abs distribution gave mediocre results, I decided to try again, but this time without integrating over experimental observables throught analysis, except for at the final step. To illustrate what I mean, see the histogram below:

Large
Every singles event lies in a three dimensional space consisting of a PMT top and bottom time, and a specific detector. These observables can be recast as energy, vertical z position, and detector angle (54,78,102, ect).

The benefit of conducting the analysis in this 3D space, is that the neutrons correlated with the beam can be normalized to uncorrelated Cf252 neutrons detected in the same detector with similar positions and energies.