Difference between revisions of "Double Peak Analysis"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
The point is to determine why we have all these peaks around the spot the gamma flash is supposed to be. First, I will do an analysis to see exactly where the gamma flash is. Then, we should be able to do some tracking down of what the other peaks are from by converting the TDC spectrum into a distance scale to see how far away the other peaks are, assuming they are from gammas. | The point is to determine why we have all these peaks around the spot the gamma flash is supposed to be. First, I will do an analysis to see exactly where the gamma flash is. Then, we should be able to do some tracking down of what the other peaks are from by converting the TDC spectrum into a distance scale to see how far away the other peaks are, assuming they are from gammas. | ||
| − | =Calibration Runs== | + | ==Calibration Runs== |
The lead in front of the neutron detectors was removed. Run 1930 shows the results with no physics target, and 1931 has a D2O target. | The lead in front of the neutron detectors was removed. Run 1930 shows the results with no physics target, and 1931 has a D2O target. | ||
Revision as of 16:52, 18 April 2011
Gamma Peak Analysis
The point is to determine why we have all these peaks around the spot the gamma flash is supposed to be. First, I will do an analysis to see exactly where the gamma flash is. Then, we should be able to do some tracking down of what the other peaks are from by converting the TDC spectrum into a distance scale to see how far away the other peaks are, assuming they are from gammas.
Calibration Runs
The lead in front of the neutron detectors was removed. Run 1930 shows the results with no physics target, and 1931 has a D2O target.
