Difference between revisions of "DC hits to Moller XSection"

From New IAC Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 116: Line 116:
  
  
<center><math>\Longrightarrow 29.85^{\circ}\pm .0573^{\circ}\approx 28.88^{\circ}</math></center>
+
<center><math>\Longrightarrow 29.85^{\circ}\pm .0573^{\circ}\approx 29.88^{\circ}</math></center>
  
 
==Super Layer 1:Layer 2==
 
==Super Layer 1:Layer 2==

Revision as of 01:47, 27 October 2016

Verification using LUND and evio files

Examing the CM Frame Theta angles which correspond to Lab frame angles within 5-40 degrees, for only on degree in Phi (0 degrees)

TheoryXSect MolThetaCM 5to40Lab.png

For each degree in Theta in the Lab frame, the correct kinematic variables are written to a LUND file 1000 times. These events are read from the evio file using


The Moller Scattering angle Theta is read from the evio file, and it's weight adjusted by dividing by the number it was multiplied by (1000) to give

MolThetaCMweighted multiplied1000x.png


From the evio file, a histogram can be constructed that will only record the Moller events which result in hits in the drift chamber. A hit for this setting is the procID=90


Plotting the Moller scattering angle Theta in the Center of Mass frame just for on occurance of the CM angle gives the Moller Differential Cross-section.

DC HitsThetaCMweighted1.png


Adjusting the weight by the number of times the specific angle caused hits. We should recover the Moller differential cross-section as found previously.


DC HitsThetaCMweighted adjusted.png

Once the validity of the Moller differential cross-section is established, we can transform from the center of mass to the lab frame as shown earlier. Since the detector is in the lab frame, the hits collected will have to be used to compose a histogram for the Moller scattering angle in the lab frame. We can show that the Moller events that register as hits in the lab matches the Moller differential cross-section in the lab.

DC HitsThetaLabweighted adjusted.png

Determining wire-theta correspondance

To associate the hits with the Moller scattering angle theta, the occupancy plots of the drift chamber hits by means of wire numbers and layer must be translated using the physical constraints of the detector. Using the data released for the DC:

DC: Drift Chambers(specs)


This gives the detector with a working range of 5 to 40 degrees in Theta for the lab frame, with a resolution of 1m radian.

This sets the lower limit:

[math]\frac{5^{\circ}}{1}\frac{\pi\ radians}{180^{\circ}}=.0872664626\ radians[/math]


This sets the upper limit:

[math]\frac{40^{\circ}}{1}\frac{\pi\ radians}{180^{\circ}}=.698131700798\ radians[/math]

Taking the difference,

[math].698131700798-.0872664626\approx\ .61086523198\ radians[/math]


Dividing by 112, we find

[math]\frac{.61086523198}{112}=.005454153912\ radians\approx\ 0.0055\ radians[/math]

CED Verification

Using CED to verify the angle and wire correlation,

Super Layer 1:Layer 1

For a hit at layer 1, wire 1 we find the corresponding angle theta in the lab frame to be 4.91 degrees

Layer1Wire1Hit.png


For a hit at layer 1, wire 2 we find the corresponding angle theta in the lab frame to be 5.19 degrees

Layer1Wire2.png


Finding the difference between the two wires,

[math]5.19-4.91=.28^{\circ} \frac{\pi\ radians}{180^{\circ}}=0.004886921906\approx\ 0.00489\ radians[/math]

Examing a hit at layer 1, wire 112 we find the corresponding angle theta in the lab frame to be 40.70 degrees

Layer1Wire112.png

This sets the lower limit:

[math]\frac{4.91^{\circ}}{1}\frac{\pi\ radians}{180^{\circ}}=.085695666273\ radians\approx 0.0857\ radians[/math]


This sets the upper limit:

[math]\frac{40.70^{\circ}}{1}\frac{\pi\ radians}{180^{\circ}}=.710349005562\ radians\approx 0.710\ radians[/math]

Taking the difference,

[math].710349005562-.085695666273\approx\ .625\ radians[/math]


Dividing by 112, we find

[math]\frac{.624653339289}{112}=.005577261958\ radians\approx\ 0.00558\ radians[/math]

Noting the difference from the spacing for a single cell, to the entire detector layer

[math]0.00489-0.00558=0.00069\ \approx .001\ radians[/math]

An uncertainty of this magnitude in radians corresponds to an angular uncertainty of

[math].001\ radian\ \frac{180^{\circ}}{\pi\ radians}\approx .0573^{\circ}[/math]

Testing this for a random angle, 78 degrees we find

[math]0.00558\times 78\ = 0.43524\ radians \frac{180^{\circ}}{\pi\ radians}\approx 24.94^{\circ}[/math]

Adding this to the starting angle of 4.91 degrees

[math]4.91^{\circ}+24.94^{\circ}=29.85^{\circ}\pm .0573^{\circ}[/math]

Comparing this to CED at wire 78

Layer1Wire78.png


[math]\Longrightarrow 29.85^{\circ}\pm .0573^{\circ}\approx 29.88^{\circ}[/math]

Super Layer 1:Layer 2

Superlayer1 layer2 wire1.png


Superlayer1 layer2 wire112.png

Super Layer 1:Layer 6

Superlayer1 layer6 wire1.png



Superlayer1 layer6 wire112.png

Superlayer 2:Layer 1

Superlayer2 layer1 wire1.png



Superlayer2 layer1 wire112.png