Difference between revisions of "Cos(Theta) between two correlated neutrons. Unpolarized case."

From New IAC Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 5: Line 5:
  
  
Below is <math>cos(\Theta)</math> between two correlated neutron. No energy cut was made. Integrated over all energy spectrum.
+
Below is <math>cos(\Theta)</math> between two correlated neutrons. No energy cut was made. Integrated over all energy spectrum.
  
 
[[File:Cos theta 2n correlated.png | 700 px]]
 
[[File:Cos theta 2n correlated.png | 700 px]]

Revision as of 17:33, 10 June 2011

Below is the energy spectrum of two correlated neutrons in LAB frame. 10 million events. Sampled up to 10 MeV.

Sum 2n energy correlated.png


Below is [math]cos(\Theta)[/math] between two correlated neutrons. No energy cut was made. Integrated over all energy spectrum.

Cos theta 2n correlated.png



And with energy cut.

Cos theta 2n correlated energy cut.png


The calculated asymmetry between correlated neutrons emitted [math]\leftleftarrows[/math] and [math]\leftrightarrows[/math] is:

[math]\mbox{Asymmetry} = \frac{\mbox{counts}\ \leftrightarrows}{\mbox{counts}\ \leftleftarrows} = \frac{209,578}{3,219} = 65.10655[/math]

here:

  • [math]\mbox{counts}\ \leftrightarrows[/math] are all events with angle between two neutrons is [math]\Theta \approx (180\pm25)^o[/math]
  • [math]\mbox{counts}\ \leftleftarrows[/math] are all events with angle between two neutrons is [math]\Theta \approx (0\pm25)^o[/math]

that corresponds the 90 cm long detector located about 2 m away from target that is pretty good for time of flight technique.


Also my Yields are:

[math]\mbox{Energy}\ \mbox{Cut}\ \mbox{Yield} = \frac{\mbox{counts}\ \mbox{with}\ \mbox{cut}}{\mbox{total}\ \mbox{counts}} = \frac{1,227,505}{10,000,000} = 0.12277[/math]
[math]\mbox{Asymmetry}\ \mbox{Yield} = \frac{(\mbox{counts}\ \leftrightarrows) + (\mbox{counts}\ \leftleftarrows)}{\mbox{total}\ \mbox{counts}} = \frac{209,578 + 3,219}{10,000,000} = 0.02128[/math]


Looks good, but we need big statistics!