Difference between revisions of "Comparison of GEANT Simulation to Whitney Data"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
| <math>N_{incident}</math> || 4E7 ||4E8 || 6E6 ||6E7 || 6E7 | | <math>N_{incident}</math> || 4E7 ||4E8 || 6E6 ||6E7 || 6E7 | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | | N_{events} || 1026940 || 10270829|| ||4826141 || 1001700 | + | | <math>N_{events}</math> || 1026940 || 10270829|| ||4826141 || 1001700 |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | N_{Moller} || 975593 || 9757288|| ||4584834 || 951138 | + | | <math>N_{Moller}</math> || 975593 || 9757288|| ||4584834 || 951138 |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | t_{simulated} (s) || 1.3E-5 ||1.3E-4 || ||9.62E-5 ||9.54E-5 | + | | <math>t_{simulated}</math> (s) || 1.3E-5 ||1.3E-4 || ||9.62E-5 ||9.54E-5 |
|- | |- | ||
| Event Cross-Section (b) || 0.61 || 0.61|| ||0.38 || 0.079 | | Event Cross-Section (b) || 0.61 || 0.61|| ||0.38 || 0.079 | ||
| Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
| Individual Moller Cross-Section (b) || 5.95E-7 || 5.94E-8 || ||7.87E-8 ||7.88E-8 | | Individual Moller Cross-Section (b) || 5.95E-7 || 5.94E-8 || ||7.87E-8 ||7.88E-8 | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | | Moller event rate per barn b^{-1})|| 1.68E6 || 1.68E6 || ||1.27E7 || 1.27E7 | + | | Moller event rate per barn (<math>b^{-1}</math>)|| 1.68E6 || 1.68E6 || ||1.27E7 || 1.27E7 |
|} | |} | ||
Revision as of 21:47, 28 March 2018
| Simulation | GEANT4(1cm target) | GEANT4(1cm target) | GEANT4(5cm target) | GEANT4(5cm target) | Whitney |
| Length of Target (cm) | 1 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| 4E7 | 4E8 | 6E6 | 6E7 | 6E7 | |
| 1026940 | 10270829 | 4826141 | 1001700 | ||
| 975593 | 9757288 | 4584834 | 951138 | ||
| (s) | 1.3E-5 | 1.3E-4 | 9.62E-5 | 9.54E-5 | |
| Event Cross-Section (b) | 0.61 | 0.61 | 0.38 | 0.079 | |
| Total Moller Cross-Section (b) | 0.58 | 0.58 | 0.361 | 0.075 | |
| Individual Moller Cross-Section (b) | 5.95E-7 | 5.94E-8 | 7.87E-8 | 7.88E-8 | |
| Moller event rate per barn () | 1.68E6 | 1.68E6 | 1.27E7 | 1.27E7 |
Total dectector events occur for about 2.5% of the incident electrons on a LH2 target. We can assume that the Moller rate is 95% of the total event rate. We can assume the number of Moller events that occur within the DC range to be around 30% of the total Moller events occuring for the number of incident electrons for LH2 as well. Since the differential cross-section over the angel theta is proportional to the differtial cross-section over wire number we can dividing the Moller differential cross-section by the product of the density and length of the target material
If we were to integrate the Moller Differential Cross Section