Difference between revisions of "Bull"

From New IAC Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
  
  
*Do you think it is real that electron can be simultaneously in several places, like QM told to us?  
+
*It is real that electron can be simultaneously in several places, like QM told to us?  
 
+
*Why electron does not radiate when it orbits around the atomic nuclei?
*Do we really understand why electron does not radiate when it orbits around the atomic nuclei?
+
*Why the laws of classical electrodynamics  does not apply to atom?
 
 
*Do we really understand why the low of classical electrodynamics  does not apply to atom?
 
 
 
 
*Will electron radiate when it travels in curved space-time?
 
*Will electron radiate when it travels in curved space-time?
  
Line 18: Line 15:
  
 
'''measurements'''
 
'''measurements'''
 
 
The all troubles in physics comes because people talk in different languages (Tower of Babel)
 
The all troubles in physics comes because people talk in different languages (Tower of Babel)
  
Line 28: Line 24:
  
  
'''physics law'''
+
'''physics laws'''
 
 
 
*Nature -> measurements (people are doing) -> incomplete information -> physics
 
*Nature -> measurements (people are doing) -> incomplete information -> physics
 
*There is nature which does not care about physics. The physics law reflect the incomplete information which  people have through measurements about nature
 
*There is nature which does not care about physics. The physics law reflect the incomplete information which  people have through measurements about nature

Latest revision as of 19:43, 26 September 2013

go back


  • It is real that electron can be simultaneously in several places, like QM told to us?
  • Why electron does not radiate when it orbits around the atomic nuclei?
  • Why the laws of classical electrodynamics does not apply to atom?
  • Will electron radiate when it travels in curved space-time?


wave function?

  • QM interpretation: w.f. describes the particle (probability to find the particles in certain place and certain time etc...)
  • Bayesian interpretation: w.f. describes the incomplete information about the particle


measurements The all troubles in physics comes because people talk in different languages (Tower of Babel)

[math] y = \Theta + x [/math]

  • [math]\Theta[/math] - phenomenon, nature;
  • x - noise
  • y - measurement


physics laws

  • Nature -> measurements (people are doing) -> incomplete information -> physics
  • There is nature which does not care about physics. The physics law reflect the incomplete information which people have through measurements about nature