Difference between revisions of "Analysis"

From New IAC Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 1: Line 1:
 
=Particle Identification=
 
=Particle Identification=
 
==Electron==
 
==Electron==
==Pion==
 
=Quality Checks=
 
==Rates==
 
==Asymmetries==
 
  
 
== Cuts ==
 
== Cuts ==
Line 11: Line 7:
  
  
[[Image:Etotal_over_P_using_tot_cut.gif]]<br>
+
[[Image:Etotal_over_P_using_tot_cut.gif | 50 px]]<br>
 
Without any cuts we have 181018 entries. After using the following cut <math>EC_{tot}>0.2*p</math> we are getting 127719 entries, which is about 70.55% of 181018. <br>
 
Without any cuts we have 181018 entries. After using the following cut <math>EC_{tot}>0.2*p</math> we are getting 127719 entries, which is about 70.55% of 181018. <br>
  
  
 
[[Image:Einner_over_P_using_tot_cut.gif]]<br>
 
[[Image:Einner_over_P_using_tot_cut.gif]]<br>
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
  
Line 43: Line 28:
  
 
[[Image:Einner_over_P_using_both_cuts.gif]]<br>
 
[[Image:Einner_over_P_using_both_cuts.gif]]<br>
 +
 +
==Pion==
 +
=Quality Checks=
 +
==Rates==
 +
==Asymmetries==

Revision as of 15:44, 6 August 2007

Particle Identification

Electron

Cuts

[math]EC_{tot}\gt 0.2*p[/math]


Etotal over P using tot cut.gif
Without any cuts we have 181018 entries. After using the following cut [math]EC_{tot}\gt 0.2*p[/math] we are getting 127719 entries, which is about 70.55% of 181018.


Einner over P using tot cut.gif


[math]EC_{inner}\gt 0.08*p[/math]

Etotal over P using inner cut.gif

After the cut on the energy deposited into inner part of electron calorimeter, number of entries decreases by 22%.
Einner over P using inner cut.gif

Both cuts are applied

Etotal over P using both cuts.gif

In case of using the cuts of the total deposited energy and the eneregy deposited into inner calorimeter number of entries decreases ~36%

Einner over P using both cuts.gif

Pion

Quality Checks

Rates

Asymmetries