Difference between revisions of "2NCorr Photon flux estimate"

From New IAC Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 1: Line 1:
 
=Overview=
 
=Overview=
 
An estimated lower bound for the photon flux throughout the experiment can be calculated from the data of a D2O target.  
 
An estimated lower bound for the photon flux throughout the experiment can be calculated from the data of a D2O target.  
The measured neutron rate from D2O depends on the following: the (G,n) cross-section as a function of energy, the energy distribution of the brem photons, target geometry, detector efficiency, and photon flux. The (G,n) cross-sections are known and the brem energy distribution can be taken from an MCNP simulation. The only remaining unknown variables are photon flux and detector efficiency. By setting detector efficiency to 100%, and considering only geometric effects (i.e. solid angle), a lower bound can be placed on the photon flux incident on all targets.
+
The measured neutron rate from D2O depends on the following: the (G,n) cross-section as a function of energy, the energy distribution of the brem photons, target geometry, detector efficiency, and photon flux. The (G,n) cross-sections are known and the brem energy distribution can be taken from an MCNP simulation. The only remaining unknown variables are photon flux and detector efficiency. By setting detector efficiency to 100%, and considering only geometric effects (i.e. solid angle), a lower bound can be placed on the photon flux incident on all targets.
 
 
 
 
[[File:2NcorrBremFit.png|thumb|500px|Energy distribution of collimated bremsstrahlung photons from the passage of 10.5 MeV electrons through 1" of Al. Data is taken from an MCNP simulation.]]
 
  
 
=calculation=
 
=calculation=

Revision as of 05:01, 4 January 2018

Overview

An estimated lower bound for the photon flux throughout the experiment can be calculated from the data of a D2O target. The measured neutron rate from D2O depends on the following: the (G,n) cross-section as a function of energy, the energy distribution of the brem photons, target geometry, detector efficiency, and photon flux. The (G,n) cross-sections are known and the brem energy distribution can be taken from an MCNP simulation. The only remaining unknown variables are photon flux and detector efficiency. By setting detector efficiency to 100%, and considering only geometric effects (i.e. solid angle), a lower bound can be placed on the photon flux incident on all targets.

calculation

The measured neutron rate is given by:

[math]N_{\gamma}*\int_0^{10.5}\! \epsilon(E)*P(n_0|E)*P(E)\,dE[/math]
[math]N_{\gamma}[/math] is the number of photons between 2.3 MeV (the threshold for photo-disintegration of D2O), and 10.5 MeV (the end-point energy)
[math]E[/math] is the photon energy
[math]\epsilon(E)[/math] is the detector efficiency
P(n_0|E) is the probability of a photo-disintegration given a photon energy E
P(E) is the probability of a photon having energy E.