Difference between revisions of "05/13/2011 coincidence test"

From New IAC Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 8: Line 8:
  
  
The voltages and thresholds  are as below. Note: I increased my thresholds for PS1 and PS2 from 80 mV up to 100 mV according to my previous calibration threshold line.
+
The voltages, thresholds and widths are as below. Note: I increased my thresholds for PS1 and PS2 from 80 mV up to 100 mV according to my previous calibration threshold line.
 
{| border="1" cellspacing="0" style="text-align: center; width: 800px; height: 100px;"
 
{| border="1" cellspacing="0" style="text-align: center; width: 800px; height: 100px;"
 
! scope="col" width="50" |
 
! scope="col" width="50" |

Revision as of 05:02, 14 May 2011

Go Back

Set up like that:

Detector1.png

the distance between PS and n's PMT is abot 80 cm


The voltages, thresholds and widths are as below. Note: I increased my thresholds for PS1 and PS2 from 80 mV up to 100 mV according to my previous calibration threshold line.

PMT voltage, V threshold, mV discr. width, ns
PS1 -1000 -100 50
PS1 -1000 -100 50
n's -1500 -200 10



First let's do the PS1+PS2 coincidence test

counts time counts/sec
PS1 [math]2823\pm53.1[/math] 20 min [math]2.35\pm0.04[/math]
PS2 [math]3091\pm55.6[/math] 20 min [math]2.58\pm0.05[/math]
PS1+PS2 [math]93\pm9.6[/math] 20 min [math](7.7\pm0.8)\cdot 10^{-2}[/math]


The scope picture of PS1+PS2 coincidence event like:

Cosmic coinc PS1 PS2.png



Second tet's do the PS1+PS2+n's coincidence test

counts time counts/sec
PS1 [math]3229\pm56.8[/math] 20 min [math]2.69\pm0.05[/math]
PS2 [math]3192\pm56.5[/math] 20 min [math]2.66\pm0.05[/math]
PS1+PS2+n's [math]59\pm7.7[/math] 20 min [math](4.9\pm0.6)\cdot 10^{-2}[/math]


The scope picture of PS1+PS2 coincidence event like:

Cosmic coinc PS1 PS2 n.png


The ratio of (PS+PS2) rate to (PS+PS2+n's) rate is

[math]\frac{7.7}{4.9} = 1.6[/math]