Difference between revisions of "05/11/2011 n's detector threshold calibration"

From New IAC Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with '[https://wiki.iac.isu.edu/index.php/N%27s_detector_calibration Go Back] Because is something wrong I decided to measure the counts rate as function of threshold energy. Maybe m…')
 
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
[https://wiki.iac.isu.edu/index.php/N%27s_detector_calibration Go Back]
+
[https://wiki.iac.isu.edu/index.php/Roman_measurements go back]
  
  
 
Because is something wrong I decided to measure the counts rate as function of threshold energy. Maybe my threshold was incorrect.
 
Because is something wrong I decided to measure the counts rate as function of threshold energy. Maybe my threshold was incorrect.
  
Below are my results for n's detector with HAMAMATSU PMT (-1500 V):
+
Below are my results for n's detector with HAMAMATSU PMT (-1500 V).  The signal is cosmic.
  
 
[[File:Det1 callibration.png | 1000 px]]
 
[[File:Det1 callibration.png | 1000 px]]

Latest revision as of 19:01, 24 May 2012

go back


Because is something wrong I decided to measure the counts rate as function of threshold energy. Maybe my threshold was incorrect.

Below are my results for n's detector with HAMAMATSU PMT (-1500 V). The signal is cosmic.

Det1 callibration.png


So it looks like my previous threshold value (-500 mV) was not good. Let's set it up the -200 mV. And let's see does the n's detector sensitive to the source. The same set up and distances as before.

counts/sec (5 min test), no source counts/sec (5 min test), with source on the top of PS1
n's 19.89[math]\pm[/math]0.26 (total 5966 cnts) 58.84[math]\pm[/math]0.29 (total 17652 cnts)

So now we see the source. The ratio are:

[math]\frac{Rate_{source}}{Rate_{w/source}} = \frac{58.84}{19.89} = 2.96 [/math]