Runs 4111(D2O)/4112(H2O)

Subtraction of stops for D2O

Subtraction of the stops for each detector in the case of D2O target. The length of the active area (scintillator) of the detector is 75.3 cm.

Subtraction of stops for H2O

Subtraction of the stops for each detector in the case of H2O target:

Subtraction of D2O and H2O ToF

Normalized superimposed timing spectra from D2O(black line)/H2O(red line) targets and bin-by-bin subtraction (green line) of D2O-H2O data:

Neutron energy analysis

Neutron energy distribution data analysis for run 4111:

File:D2O neutron spectra.pdf

Errors on the neutron energy for the case of Det M:

[math]E_n \pm U(E_n)=m_nc^2/2 \cdot 1/c^2 \cdot (l_n/t_n)^2 \cdot [1 \pm 2 \sqrt{U^2(l_n)/l^2_n + U^2(t_n)/t^2_n}][/math]

Where uncertainty in the neutron flight pass due to the finite width of the detector (14.8 cm) [math]U(l_n) = 14.8cm/2 \cdot cos(\theta)[/math] and uncertainty in zero time definition in neutron TOF spectrum [math]U(t_n)=10 ns[/math]

Correlation between the neutron energy and neutron energy uncertainty is plotted below:

The above plot may look better if you plot [math]Energy[/math] -vs- ([math]Energy \pm Energy[/math]) 
As the energy increased the uncertainty increases to the point the the error bar is as big as the magnitude of the energy.

Simulation of n-flight path. DetM.

Simulation of the flight path length uncertainty [math]U(l_n)[/math] for Det M(1,2) placed right below the target:

Cylindrical target with dimensions of real target was used. It was filled with liquid D2. 1 MeV neutrons were generated inside the target uniformly and isotropically. The shortest distance from the target to the detector surface was 97.4 cm (corresponds to zero in the plot of the Delta_L)

The whole range fit:

Central region fit:

As can be seen we have [math]U(l_n)[/math] of ~ 3.3 cm for the whole detector (no binning).

Experimental data Det M

The correlation of neutron energy [math]E_n = m_nc^2/2 \cdot 1/c^2 \cdot (l_n/t_n)^2[/math] and its uncertainty [math]U(E_n)= 2 \sqrt{(3.3cm)^2/l^2_n + (10ns)^2/t^2_n} \cdot 100\%[/math] for the case neutron ToF cut [20,65] ns:

If we consider the neutron time of flight uncertainty [math]U(t_n) = 7 ns[/math] and [math]U(l_n) = 3.3 cm[/math] then the correlation plot changes to

If we consider the neutron time of flight uncertainty [math]U(t_n) = 1 ns[/math] and [math]U(l_n) = 3.3 cm[/math] then the correlation plot changes to

It can be concluded that the neutron energy uncertainty is really sensitive to the neutron ToF uncertainty. In our case we had a long tail in photon peak which could possibly distort the zero time definition and the precision of neutron energy calculation.

Simulation of n-flight path. DetH.

Simulated neutron flight pass lenrgth distribution is presented below:

The width of the distribution is about 10 cm wide.

Experimental data: