Interim Report 5-18-08 AwardNum0653570

Participants

		Tony Forest	   Principal Investigator	Yes
		Julian Salamanca	   Graduate student	No
		Tamar Didberidze	   Graduate student	Yes
		Jordan Keough	   Undergraduate student	No
		Jeremy Lebaron	   Undergraduate student	Yes

Activities and Findings

This section will serve as your report to your program officer of your project's activities and findings. Please describe what you have done and what you have learned, broken down into four categories:

What have been your major research and education activities (experiments, observations, simulations,presentations, etc.)

Qweak Region 1 Tracking System Detector Construction

The Qweak Region 1 tracking system is one of three tracking systems designed to measure the [math]Q^2[/math] profile of elastically scattered electrons as well as the background contributions to the parity violating asymmetry. The region 1 tracking system is located behind the first collimator at a distance of about 550 cm from the main torus magnet ( 200 cm from the target) as show in the left hand figure below. The collimator divides the [math]\phi[/math] acceptance into 8 regions, octants, and reduces the azimuthal acceptance by almost 30 percent. The right hand figure below shows the elastci scattering profile overlayed on top of one of the octants. The Region 1 tracking system will measure the electron scattering angle at only 2 of the octants at a time and will rotate in [math]\phi[/math] in order to measure the electrons in the remaining octants.

The high radiation flux and the small detector footprint are two of the biggest challenges facing the Region 1 tracking system. An ionization chamber equiped with Gas Electron Multipliers (GEMs) was chosen in order to withstand the high radiation flux near the target. The GEM preamplifiers allow smaller ionization cell sizes thereby resulting in ionization chamber rise times of 50 nanoseconds or less. The ionization chamber itself is constructed from Ertalyte, a machinable plastic material which can withstand the high radiation environment. The material's strength allows the chamber to have thin walls which prevent the chamber from extending into adjacent octants.

The three major components to the Qweak Region 1 detector are the GEM preamplifiers, the charge collector, and the ionization chamber.

Preamplifier design and procurement

The figure below shows the custom designed GEM preamplifier for the Qweak Region 1 tracking system. The preamplifier is a 50 micron thick kapton foil clad on both sides with 5 microns of copper. Holes are etched into the foil such that a voltage applied across the top and bottom copper plates will create an electric field strong enough to cause charge to pass through the hole and multiply much like the avalanche region of a drift chamber. Enigneers from the Idaho Accelerator Center (IAC) designed the shape of the foils and the location of 6 tabs used for HV connections, as shown in the left hand figure below. This generic design allows one to use the part for any GEM amplification stage simply by cutting off the unused HV tabs. The actual preamp is shown on the right hand side of the figure below. Although this is a simple part, it is a clear example of how the infrastructure at the IAC can be leveraged in support of our physics mission.

Charge Collector Design

The charge collector for Qweak's region 1 tracking system is shown below. The copper charge collector strips are aligned in terms of the electron scattering angle [math]\theta[/math]. Each of the red strips shown in the right hand figure below is 400 microns wide and will measure the elastic elctron scattering angle to within 0.1 mradians. The blue lines shown in the left hand figure are representative of the [math]\phi[/math] scattering angle. A large number of graduate student hours were needed to place each strip into the correct position using the charge collector design software. Software compatibility issues with the vendor were also a major time sink of several months before the part could be accurately manufactured according to our specifications. This single part represents the bulk of a graduate students effort for the past 6 months.

Ionization Chamber Construction

The ionization chamber for the Qweak Region 1 tracking system needed to have a small profile in order to be placed a half meter after the target. A collimator in front of this detector divides the electron scattering anglular range into octants which reduce the angular acceptance range by 20 percent due the collimator material blocking The goal was to construct a chamber which did not interfere with the other octants.

Qweak readout electronics

The VFAT digitization board has been selected as the core readout electronics for the Region 1 tracking system in Qweak. The VFAT card was designed at CERN for use in the TOTEM experiment. It was designed to be used for either silicon or GEM based detectors. The board can sample it's 128 input channels at 40 MHz and store up to 128 triggered events. It has been designed to withstand up to 100 Mrad of radiation.

VFAT board

I2C communication

Readout switchyard

The lines of communication between the VFAT readout board, the Gumstick controller, and the VME FPGA I/O module are manages by a signal switchyard being designs at ISU. Brian Oborn, a technician from the IAC, is mentoring Jordan Keough's design of the signal switchyard board. Jordan is a physics undergraduate. The switchyard will divert signals between the three detector readout elements to their appropriate destination. I2C signals will travel between the Gum stick control computer to the VFAT readout card according to address switches on the switchyard board. The switchyard board will also be used to input clock signals for sampling the detector as well as a Flip Flop scan signal to check for radiation damage to the board. The switchyard will send LVDS signals containing the Detector data from the VFAT readout board to the VME FPGA I/O module.

What are your major findings from the activities identified above

Qweak readout electronics

Speed test results

The readout system for Qweak's region 1 tracking system is capable of sampling the detector at 40 MHz. Although elastically scattered electrons which traverse the entire Qweak apparatus are expected to trigger the readout system at rates of about 1 kHz, there is a large background due to moller scattering which corresponds to rates of 12 MHz/nA uniformly distributed over the entire region 1 acceptance. This moller rate on a single detector strip would be about 25 kHz/nA. This restricts the region 1 tracking system to operating currents below 400 nA since the detector rise time of 50 nanoseconds will result in signal pileup if the ionization particle flux rates exceed 10 MHz. All three components of the Qweak tracking system are expected to operate together at currents of 0.1 nAs.

On 2/15/07 Ben Royd tested the read and write speeds between the VPM backplane and the FPGA user registers. He was able to write 16 bits to USER FPGA in 330 ns.

What research and teaching skills and experience has the project helped provide to those who worked on the project

Describe the opportunities for training and development provided by your project.

As part of her graduate studies, Tamar Didberidze has been quantifying the performance of two proto-type drift chambers for Hall-B. The ionization chamber principle is similar to the GEM chambers being built for Qweak. Two ionization chamber proto-types were built by JLab and sent to ISU. They are identical except that one uses an all plastic feedthrough to hold the drift chamber wires and another has a plastic feedthrough with a metal tip where the wire makes contact with the feedthrough. The proto-type detectors will be used to evaluate the efficency of the chamber as a function of the ionizating particles position from the end of the wire. A Garfield simulation leads one to believe that the plastic tipped feedthrough will result in a less efficent detector near the and of the wire. The answer to this question will impact the design of drift chambers for the CLAS 12 upgrade.

During this funding cycle, Tamar has discovered that the proto-type detector using plastic feedthroughs is noisier than the one which has metal tips.

As part of his graduate student studies, Julian Slamanca has gained substantial experience machining the Qweak detectors.

Julian Salamance and Jordan Kenough gained experience designing circuit boards. Julian design the charge collector for Qweak which is being fabricated by CERN. Jordan design the HV distribution board which was described above.

What outreach activities have you undertaken to increase public understanding of, and participation in, science and technology?

Describe outreach activities your project has undertaken.

The physics department at ISU travels to local schools to perform physics demonstrations in an effort to increase the publics understanding of science and technology. The demonstrations occur at night in order to illustrate physics principles to students and their parents. I went to Syringa elementary school during this last funding cycle to demonstrate several principles of electricity to student and their parents. A small Van de Graf was used to demonstrate principles of conduction. The principles of producting electricity were demonstrated using solenoids and the effect of liquid nitrogen on Eddy currents induced in a copper conducter were some of the popular components of the demonstrations.

Physics lecture on Detector operations to High school inters and teachers. He-3 tube neutron detector operation.

Publications and Products

In this section, you will be asked to describe the tangible products coming out of your project. Specifically:

What have you published as a result of this work? Journal publications

Books or other non-periodical, one-time publications

What Web site or other Internet site have you created?

What other specific products (databases, physical collections, educational aids, software, instruments, or the like) have you developed?

Contributions

Now we invite you to explain ways in which your work, your findings, and specific products of your project are significant. Describe the unique contributions, major accomplishments, innovations and successes of your project relative to :

the principal discipline(s) of the project;

other disciplines of science or engineering;

the development of human resources;

the physical, institutional, or information resources that form the infrastructure for research and education; and

other aspects of public welfare beyond science and engineering, such as commercial technology, the economy, cost-efficient environmental protection, or solutions to social problems.

Special Requirements

Go Back