CH Thesis Revision 1

Introduction

Optically Stimulated Luminescence Dosimeters (OSLs) are used at the Idaho Accelerator Center (IAC) in Pocatello, Idaho to measure radiation exposure. Dose measurements began with the Dot[math]^{tm}[/math] OSLs but issues with reproducibility led to the use of the newer nanoDot[math]^{tm}[/math]OSLs. These OSLs were calibrated using calculated exposures from a ¹³⁷Cs source as there were questions about just how reproducible and responsive the OSLs are to ionizing radiation. The calculated exposure can be quantified in terms of absorbed dose through the relationship of photomultiplier tube (PMT) counts and dose through a simple conversion and linear relationship of the two values. The OSLs can then be used to take well understood dose measurements in mixed radiation fields.

You need to explain the difference between absorbed and effective dose

Theory

Optically Stimulated Luminescence

Optically stimulated luminescence describes the emission of light that results when photons are used to free trapped electrons (holes) moving them to the conduction (valence) band such that they recombine with trapped holes (electrons). Incident ionizing radiation creates electron-hole pairs. As the hole or electron moves through the band gap, they can become trapped in imperfections in the crystal lattice thus retaining some of the energy deposited by the radiation. By exposing the crystal to an LED, these trapped holes and electrons are freed and can then recombine[1]. Photons are emitted through the recombining process which are ejected from the crystal and proceed to be counted by a photomultiplier tube.

you should read the reference below.  In particular Figure 3.2.  You do not mention the role of defects in the above description

[1] http://www.iaea.org/inis/collection/NCLCollectionStore/_Public/35/058/35058187.pdf

Optically Stimulated Luminescence Dosimeters (OSLs)

The nanoDot[math]^{tm}[/math] OSL is a carbon-doped aluminum oxide crystal with diameter of 0.501 [math]\pm[/math] 0.007 cm and a thickness of 0.03 [math]\pm[/math]0.001 cm. These dimensions yield an average volume of [math]5.89*10^{-3} \pm 1.9*10^{-4} cm^{3}[/math]. This crystal is contained within a (1 [math]\pm[/math] 0.001 cm) x (1 [math]\pm[/math] 0.002 cm) x (0.196 [math]\pm[/math] 0.002 cm) ABS plastic square to stop the crystal annealing in daylight.

Each of the OSLs are labeled with a unique serial number that is used to uniquely identify an OSL with a specific spatial location. Having the position of each OSL logged during experiments yields off axis dose information for the incident beam, as well as a measurement of radiation field intensity as a function of position.

Front of a nanoDot^tm OSL with serial number.

Back of a nanoDot^tm OSL with exposed crystal.

re-write the two paragraphs below.  Start with a paragraph describing irradiation.  The next paragraph describes how the OSLs are reusable

Electrons fired from the S-Band 25B Linac at the IAC impinge upon OSLs and deposit energy as they travel through its crystalline structure. As electrons hit the OSL crystal, energy is deposited into the lattice structure through mechanisms such as ionization and collisions, with ionization being the dominant process. When the OSLs are irradiated in a photon beam; pair production, Compton scattering, and ionization all contribute. Again, ionization is the leading effect. Through these processes, energy is trapped in the band structure as described in section X.Y. 

The OSLs are capable of being re-used by  subjecting an irradiated OSL to light produced by a Verilux HappyLightR Deluxe. Each OSL is read prior to use to allow for any non-zero amount of energy that may still be stored in the crystal lattice following annealing. This quantity is considered to be the background for any measurement and is subsequently subtracted from the PMT counts following an irradiation. These background subtracted PMT counts give the direct response of the OSL to the exposure to which it was subjected.

Deposited Energy Simulations

First you should describe the problem to be simulated.  You are using a simulation to predict the dose on an OSL.  You should describe how the OSLs are irradiated with electrons and photons.  Then describe the steps GEANT4 takes to predict the OSL dose.  The first step is to measure the electron beam divergence.  The next step is to put that divergence into the simulation to predict the resulting photon distribution.

GEANT4 is used to simulate the interaction of ionizing radiation with the OSLs to mimic the experimental setup and to discern a baseline expected dose per pulse for the 25B Linac at the IAC. It is important to understand he divergence of the incident electron beam as the larger the divergence, the fewer electrons that irradiate the OSL. Glass plates were irradiated before the experimental run at 50 cm and 100 cm from the end of the beam pipe separately to find the beam divergence as a function of distance. The standard deviation in the beam spot was found by using a scan of each glass slide and then using ROOT's image processing functions to create histograms which were then converted from pixels to centimeters in the X and Y dimensions. Using these two images, the divergence is calculated by assuming a linear increase between the standard deviation of the images. It is possible to extrapolate back to the end of the beam pipe and infer the spot size as the beam enters the air once the standard deviation ratio in beam intensity is found. The ratio of the standard deviations is 0.593. The characteristics of the beam divergence are included in the GEANT4 macro in appendix 1.

Processed image of irradiated glass slide at 50 cm before beam retune.

Due to a systematic failure of a gate valve in the accelerator, the beam had to be retuned after the initial images were created, and a third glass plate was then irradiated at 50 cm from the end of the beam pipe for the retuned beam. The beam used to irradiate the OSLs had a standard deviation of 1.626 cm, inferred from the glass plate irradiated at 50 cm. Assuming similar divergence characteristics, the spread was scaled using the same scaling factor of 0.593. Using this information to extrapolate back to the end of the beam pipe, the beam had a calculated sigma of 0.965 cm. The beam divergence characteristics assumed here were used in GEANT4 for a simulation of the expected dose per pulse.

Electron beam propagating through 50 cm of air to show beam divergence.

To begin the process of simulating a pulse of the 25B Linac at the IAC, the number of electrons per pulse must be found. Using a [math]50\ \frac{mA}{pulse}[/math] peak current and a pulse width of [math]500\ ns[/math], the number of electrons per pulse is found to be [math]1.56055*10^{11}\frac{e^{-}}{pulse}[/math]. In order to save computation time, the number of electrons simulated is scaled down by 5 orders of magnitude to [math]1.56055*10^{6}\frac{e^{-}}{pulse}[/math]. The beam is incident upon a titanium beam pipe window, 50 cm of air, and finally the OSL crystal in the simulation. Energy is lost throughout the travel of the beam through each volume before impinging upon the OSL crystal. The energy deposited in the OSL crystal is summed of the course of the whole simulation and then scaled back up to represent a full pulse from the accelerator. Finding the simulated dose per pulse is accomplished by dividing the deposited energy by the mass of the OSL crystal. This gave the dose in units of Gray; which were then converted directly to Rad to be used in comparison to measured results. [math] \text{Simulated deposited energy per pulse} = 2590.81*10^{5}\text{MeV} = 4.1509350664*10^{-5} \text{J} [/math]

[math] \frac{4.1509350664*10^{-5} \text{J}}{0.0234777*10^{-3}\text{Kg}}=1.76803 \text{Gy/pulse} = 176.803 \text{Rad/pulse} [/math]

Experimental Apparatus

The nanoDot^tm OSL performance was determined by first calibrating the detectors with a known source and then exposing the detectors to both photons and electrons from a linear accelerator. A radioactive source of Cs-137 with a known activity of 9.3 Ci was used to irradiate and calibrate the OSLs. A description of this source is given below in section 3.1. After a reliable calibration is found, the OSLs are exposed to a radiation field of only Bremsstrahlung photons using electrons accelerated by the linac described in section 3.2. The accelerator exit port is then reconfigured to irradiate the OSLs in a mixed field of electrons and photons. A description of both experimental setups is given below in sections 3.3.1 and 3.3.2

Cesium Source

A 9.3 Ci ¹³⁷Cs source was used to calibrate the OSLs by determining the relationship between the PMT counts measured using the OSL reader described in Appendix A and the OSLs exposure to the Cs source. The Cs source uses a system of interlocks to safely expose the OSLs to the source's radiation. The source is enclosed by a lead container, often call a "pig". There is an acrylic face plate bolted to the front of the pig, at a set distance of 11.2cm. The OSLs are positioned 30 cm from the faceplate of the source. Once the interlock requirements have been satisfied, the air supply is turned on allowing the shutter to be opened.

Containment unit for the Cs-137 source.

The exposure rate from the source is determined based on the distance (D) from the source, the activity (A) of the source, and a constant ([math]\Gamma[/math]). The exposure rate for any given distance is calculated in units of Roentgen/hr using the equation

[math] \dot R = \frac {\Gamma A }{ D^2} [/math]

A gamma factor of [math]{\Gamma} = 0.33 \frac {(m^2)(R)}{(Ci)(hr)} [/math] and activity [math]{A} = 9.3\ Ci[/math] is used in these calculations. The distance from the faceplate to the surface of the source needs to be taken into account given the inverse squared distance dependency of the exposure rate. The total distance D is then, D = (Distance to faceplate + 0.112m).

With the exposure rate ([math]R_dot[/math]) found using these known values, it is possible to find the total exposure ([math]R_{tot}[/math]) the OSLs are subjected to by integrating the exposure rate over the time the OSL was exposed to the source.

[math] R_{tot}=\int\limits_{t_0}^{t_f}\dot R\ dt [/math]

It is necessary when working with exposure to be able to convert from Roentgen to Rad as exposure is calculated in Roentgen and dose is measure in Rad or Gy. The relationship between background subtracted PMT counts and dose can be established using the relationship of 1.14554 Roentgen = 1 Rad.

25B Linac

The RF frequency of the IAC's S-Band 25B Linac is 2856 MHz with an energy range of 4 - 25 MeV. With peak currents being easily able to hit 100mA, and pulse widths from 50 ns to 4 [math]\mu[/math]s, this accelerator is fully capable to operate at the simulated parameters of 8 MeV, 500 ns pulse width, and 50 mA peak current.

0 degree port leading to end of beam pipe.

Experimental Procedure

Photon Beam

To expose the OSLs to a photon beam, a one inch thick aluminum brick and sweeper magnet were inserted at 50 cm from the end of the beam pipe. The aluminum brick was used as the converter followed by the sweeper magnet to redirect any charged particles away from the photon beam. An array of 17 OSLs was placed at a distance of one meter from the end of the beam pipe and then irradiated. This setup was irradiated twice, with different arrays of OSLs to gather dose per pulse information for the photon beam. Each array was exposed to approximately 52000 pulses at a rep rate of 250Hz. The run plan can be found in Appendix 2.

To discern dose per pulse and reproducibility information from the measurements of the photon beam, the OSLs are subjected to the same beam characteristics throughout the custom run-plan. These characteristics consist of a beam energy of 8 MeV, pulse width of 500 ns, and a peak current of 50 mA.

Looking in the direction of beam travel to see front face of the aluminum brick.

Sweeping magnet used to change the direction of travel of all charged particles.

Average dose of the two arrays irradiated by the photon beam. Each square corresponds to the physical size and location of each OSL irradiated.

Electron Beam

Exposing OSLs to an electron beam is accomplished by placing an OSL in front of the 25B Linac at the IAC. Using electrical tape to secure an OSL to a glass plate at 50 cm from end of beam pipe, and a laser centered on the end of the beam pipe, the OSL can be exposed to electrons on-axis for the beam. This setup is used to gather dose per pulse information. Then, by varying the number of pulses which impinge upon the OSLs, a pulse versus dose relationship can be established.

Once single OSLs had been irradiated on-axis, a 4 x 4 array of 16 OSLs was inserted and exposed to the electron beam. As the 4 x 4 array did not allow for a symmetric orientation while having an OSL centered on-axis, the future arrays were modified to consist of 17 OSLs. This modification created more data points for the on-axis dose per pulse measurements. The OSLs were measured before and after irradiation to see how much dose was deposited.

Array of 16 OSLs mounted for irradiation.

Array of 17 OSLs mounted for irradiation.

Calculated dose from the OSLs irradiated in the electron beam. Each square corresponds to the physical size and location of each OSL irradiated.

Data Analysis

nanoDot^tm OSL Calibration

The response of the nanoDot^tm OSLs to electrons and photons can be quantified in terms of dose using a calibration. Initial attempts to calibrate the OSLs were to follow the manufacturers guidelines, through which two different calibrations are created; a high dose, and a low dose. The low dose calibration is used by the OSL reader when the measured dose is less than 10000 mRad, and the high dose is used for any values exceeding 10000 mRad. These calibrations are created by reading in pre-dosed OSLs provided by Landauer so the OSL reader software can create a linear fit between PMT counts and dose. Using these calibrations assumes that the pre-dosed OSLs have not been subjected to any other exposure during the shipping and storing before use. It was this assumption that led to the creation of a custom calibration using a Cs-137 source. Using a source of known activity allows for calculated exposure rates and a well understood calibration as there is less uncertainty in the dose on the OSL.

By subjecting the OSLs to a known total exposure, it is possible to eliminate the effect of any unknown factors that could have invalidated the listed dose on the pre-dosed OSLs supplied by Landauer. Therefore to establish the relationship between background subtracted PMT counts and total exposure for the OSLs, a custom calibration was needed. This calibration is used in lieu of the calibration given by the OSL reader.

To begin the calibration, a set of fifteen previously unexposed OSLs is chosen at random and exposed to the 9.3Ci Cesium-137 source.

Multiple OSLs were exposed to the Cs-137 source for the same amount of time and then each was measured by the OSL reader. The PMT counts were recorded and a standard deviation was determined by: [math] \sigma = \sqrt{\frac{\Sigma(x_{i}\ -\ \bar x)^{2}}{n\ -\ 1}} [/math]

Where [math]x_{i}[/math] is each PMT measurement and [math]\bar x[/math] is the average of the PMT counts and n is the number of OSLs subjected to the same exposure. The standard deviation was used as the uncertainty in the PMT counts for the calibration. The Cs-137 source has a 30.17 yr half life, leading to an essentially static activity during the time of irradiation, as such, no uncertainty can be established in calculated exposure.

With the standard deviations in the PMT counts calculated, the relative error for each calculated exposure can be calculated. It was found that the relative error of the PMT counts varied between 3% and 5.3%. The relative percent error is found by [math] \text{Rel. Err.}=\frac{\sigma_{PMT}}{PMT Average}*100\% [/math]

Experimental Data

Photon Beam

The dose that the OSL absorbs from a photon beam was simulated to be less than that of an electron beam which was then shown experimentally. The OSLs were irradiated with a small number of pulses and then the central OSL was measured. This initial measurement gave a rough calculation of how many pulses the arrays could safely handle without being saturated. Once the two OSL arrays had been irradiated by the photon beam, the PMT counts for each OSL were measured and the dose is calculated by using the high dose calibration in section 4.1. Following the reading of the OSLs, the calculated dose and uncertainties are input into a text file and fed into a data analysis script. This script takes the text file and interprets it into multiple images. Once all of the irradiated OSLs had been analyzed and dose had been calculated, it was found that the photon beam deposited an average of 10.32 [math]\pm[/math] 0.30 mRad per pulse.

Contour plot of the average photon dose measurements in Rad.

A 7 bin histogram is created to represent the OSLs with each bin being the same width as the OSLs. Fitting a gaussian to these histograms gives a rough interpretation of the shape of the beam impinging onto the OSLs. These two histograms are the X = Y and X = -Y diagonal OSLs. The doses used in the filling of the histograms is the average from the corresponding diagonal in each array.

X = Y Diagonal Averages of the two photon arrays.

X = -Y Diagonal Averages of the two photon arrays.

Electron Beam

Starting with single OSLs positioned on-axis for the electron beam at a distance of 50 cm, each was irradiated with two to six pulses, see run plan in Appendix 2. Using the OSL reader, PMT counts for each OSL are measured. The dose can then be calculated using PMT counts and the high dose calibration. A single array of 17 OSLs was irradiated with the electron beam following the completion of the single OSLs. This array provides off axis dose information and it covers a large enough area to provide an interpretation of the general shape of the electron beam. The X = Y and X = -Y diagonals are used to look at the shape.

Contour plot of the average photon dose measurements in Rad.

X = Y Diagonal. Shows a discrete shaping of the beam with a gaussian fit.

X = -Y Diagonal. Shows a discrete shaping of the beam with a gaussian fit.

After irradiation, the OSLs were analyzed using the OSL reader. The measured PMT Counts were used to calculate the average dose per pulse through the high dose calibration. The mean dose per pulse for the electron beam study is 213.87 [math]\pm[/math] 3.06 Rad. The dose for each PMT measurement was calculated via the fit for the high dose calibration. [math] Dose = [(slope)(PMT\ Counts) + Y_{int}] \pm \sigma_{i} [/math]

Linear fit of number of pulses vs calculated dose for all electron beam on axis OSLs with the error being relative sigma.

Experimental Uncertainty

Any measured dose in this experiment has an uncertainty that is propagated through from the high dose calibration. All of the doses were calculated directly from the measured PMT counts and then input into the following:

[math] Dose = [(slope)(PMT\ counts) + Y_{int}] \pm \sqrt{(\sigma_{slope}(PMT\ counts))^{2}+(\sigma_{Y_{int}})^{2}} [/math]

Following these calculations, the average dose per pulse can be calculated through [math] \frac{Dose}{Pulse}=\frac{\Sigma{Dose_{i}} \pm \sqrt{\Sigma\ \sigma_{i}^{2}}}{Total\ Pulses} [/math]

Where the [math]\sigma_{i}[/math] is the uncertainty in the dose and [math]dose_{i}[/math] is the dose calculation with no sigma.

With the standard deviation calculated for each individual measurement, the relative percent error is found with the same formula as in section 3.4, except with PMT counts replaced with dose.

[math] Rel.\ Err. = \frac{\sigma_{dose}}{Dose\ Average}*100\% [/math]

The calculations for the relative errors yield 4.12% for each measurement. This relative error shows that the dose can be known within [math]\pm[/math]4.12%. The result of 4.12% is also consistent with the relative error average for the calibration measurements shown in figure 37.

Conclusion

It is imperative to create a known calibration to understand the reproducibility characteristics of the OSLs. Without being certain of the exposure the calibration OSLs have been subjected to, there can be some unknown uncertainty in the calibration. By quantifying this uncertainty through known exposures and corresponding PMT measurements, any succeeding measurements are better understood.

Calculating the experimental uncertainty and propagating the uncertainty through from the high dose calibration led to the result that the OSLs are reproducible in the range of 460-1440 Rad to [math]\pm[/math] 4.12%. To follow this result, the mean dose for the on-axis electron beam is 213.87 Rad [math]\pm[/math] 1.43%, while the mean dose per pulse for the photon beam is 10.32 mRad [math]\pm[/math] 2.9%

Appendix

Appendix 1

GEANT4 Macro

/gps/particle e-

/gps/pos/type Beam

/gps/pos/rot1 1 0 0

/gps/pos/rot2 0 1 0

/gps/pos/shape Circle

/gps/pos/centre 0 0 -91 cm

/gps/pos/sigma r 0.9652 cm

/gps/ang/rot1 0 1 0

/gps/ang/rot2 1 0 0

/gps/ang/type beam1d

/gps/ang/sigma r 0.756. deg

/gps/energy 8 MeV

/run/beamOn 1560550

Appendix 2

Run Plan

\begin{center}

\resizebox{5.3in}{!}
 {
  \begin{tabular}{| c | c | c | c | c | c | c | }
   \hline
   Shot Number & Number of Pulses & Number of OSLs & Dose (Rad) (0,0) & Dose/pulse (Rad) (0,0) & Al Brick with W Converter \\ \hline
   1 & 6 & 1 & 768.10344 & 128.017 & Out  \\ \hline
   2 & 6 & 1 & 795.26442 & 132.54407 & Out   \\ \hline
   3 & 6 & 16 & Off Center & Off Center & Out  \\ \hline
   4 & 6 & 17 & 592.89645 & 98.816075 & Out \\ \hline
   5 & 6 & 1 & 1435.75504 & 239.292 & Out \\ \hline
   6 & 2 & 1 & 468.28238 & 234.14119 & Out \\ \hline
   7 & 4 & 1 & 842.87814 & 210.719535 & Out \\ \hline
   8 & 5 & 1 & 1062.99342 & 212.598684 & Out\\ \hline
   9 & 6 & 1 & 646.63748 & 215.5458267 & Out\\ \hline
   10 & 4 & 17 & 796.48564 & 199.12141 & Out\\ \hline
   11 & 51948 & 17 & 531.9275 & .01023961461 & In\\ \hline
   12 & 52106 & 17 & 541.85896 & .01039916631 & In\\ \hline
   13 & 4 & 1 & 771.12338 & 192.780845 & Out\\ \hline
   14 & 4 & 1 & 841.583 & 210.39575 & Out\\ \hline
   15 & 4 & 1 & 832.54936 & 208.13734 & Out\\ \hline
   
   \hline
   \end{tabular}
   }

\end{center}

\section{Calibration Data}

put laundauer and custom calibration tables here

\section{OSL Reader Instructions} The OSL reader is a blue box of dimensions 32.75cm x 23.25cm x 10.5cm. On the left side of the front face is the drawer in which an OSL in a holder is inserted. Once the drawer is shut, the black knob on the front is turned from H/P to E1, opening the OSL and exposing the crystal to an LED.

Appendix 3

OSL reader Insructions

The MicroStar i reader manufactured by Landauer is used to measure the radiation dose absorbed by the OSL crystal. By inserting an OSL into the reader, the crystal structure is exposed to an LED, and a photomultiplier tube on the opposing side is used to measure the photons luminescing from the crystal.

Front of OSL reader.

OSL Holder

The OSL reader has software capable of calibrating the reader, through which low dose and high dose calibrations are created. These different calibrations give separate calibration factors. To create the calibrations for the software, Landauer supplies pre-dosed OSLs providing five measurements to encompass the device's dynamic range. Due to uncertainty in exposure between dosing and usage, a custom calibration is used to reduce error in succeeding measurements. The OSL reader calculates the dose based on the observed number of PMT counts [math](N_{PMT}), \text{OSL sensitivity} (Q_{OSL}), \text{and calibration factor} (C_{f})[/math]. The equation used for this calculation is: [math] Dose (mRad) = \frac{N_{PMT}}{(C_{f})(Q_{OSL})} [/math]

---

CH Thesis