Difference between revisions of "Forest UCM CoV"

From New IAC Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 254: Line 254:
 
when  
 
when  
  
:<math>\alpha \\beta = 0</math> for any function <math>\eta(u)</math> and <math>\xi(u)</math> that vanish at the endpoints <math>u_1</math> and <math>u_2</math>  
+
:<math>\alpha \mbox{and}  \beta = 0</math> for any function <math>\eta(u)</math> and <math>\xi(u)</math> that vanish at the endpoints <math>u_1</math> and <math>u_2</math>  
  
  

Revision as of 14:28, 15 October 2014

Calculus of Variations

Fermat's Principle

Fermats principle is that light takes a path between two points that requires the least amount of time.


TF Fermat LawSines.png

If we let S represent the path of light between two points then

[math]S=vt[/math]

light takes the time [math]t[/math] to travel between two points can be expressed as

[math]t = \int_A^B dt =\int_A^B \frac{1}{v} ds [/math]


The index of refraction is denoted as

[math]n=\frac{c}{v}[/math]


[math]t = \int_A^B \frac{n}{c} ds [/math]

for light traversing an interface with an nindex of refraction $n_1$ on one side and $n_2$ on the other side we would hav e

[math]t = \int_A^I \frac{n_1}{c} ds+ \int_I^B \frac{n_2}{c} ds [/math]
[math]= \frac{n_1}{c}\int_A^I ds+ \frac{n_2}{c} \int_I^B ds [/math]
[math]= \frac{n_1}{c}\sqrt{h_1^2 + x^2}+ \frac{n_2}{c} \sqrt{h_2^2 + (\ell -x)^2} [/math]

take derivative of time with respect to [math]x[/math] to find a minimum for the time of flight

[math] \frac{d t}{dx} = 0[/math]
[math] \Rightarrow 0 = \frac{d}{dx} \left ( \frac{n_1}{c}\left ( h_1^2 + x^2 \right )^{\frac{1}{2}}+ \frac{n_2}{c} \left (h_2^2 + (\ell -x)^2 \right)^{\frac{1}{2}} \right )[/math]
[math] = \frac{n_1}{c}\left( h_1^2 + x^2 \right )^{\frac{-1}{2}} (2x) + \frac{n_2}{c} \left (h_2^2 + (\ell -x)^2 \right)^{\frac{-1}{2}} 2(\ell -x)(-1)[/math]
[math] = \frac{n_1}{c}\frac{x}{\sqrt{ h_1^2 + x^2 }} + \frac{n_2}{c} \frac{(\ell -x)(-1)}{\sqrt{h_2^2 + (\ell -x)^2}} [/math]
[math] = n_1\frac{x}{\sqrt{ h_1^2 + x^2 }} - n_2 \frac{\ell -x}{\sqrt{h_2^2 + (\ell -x)^2}} [/math]
[math] \Rightarrow n_1\frac{x}{\sqrt{ h_1^2 + x^2 }} = n_2 \frac{\ell -x}{\sqrt{h_2^2 + (\ell -x)^2}} [/math]

or

[math] \Rightarrow n_1\sin(\theta_1) = n_2 \sin(\theta_2) [/math]

Generalizing Fermat's principle to determining the shorest path

One can apply Fermat's principle to show that the shortest path between two points is a straight line.

In 2-D one can write the differential path length as

[math]ds=\sqrt{dx^2+dy^2}[/math]

using chain rule

[math]dy = \frac{dy}{dx} dx \equiv y^{\prime}(x) dx[/math]

the the path length between two points [math](x_1,y_1)[/math] and [math](x_2,y_2)[/math] is

[math]S = \int_{(x_1,y_1)}^{(x_2,y_2)} ds= \int_{(x_1,y_1)}^{(x_2,y_2)} \sqrt{dx^2+dy^2}[/math]
[math] = \int_{(x_1,y_1)}^{(x_2,y_2)} \sqrt{dx^2+\left ( y^{\prime}(x) dx\right)^2}[/math]
[math] = \int_{(x_1,y_1)}^{(x_2,y_2)} \sqrt{1+y^{\prime}(x)^2}dx[/math]

adding up the minimum of the integrand function is one way to minimize the integral ( or path length)

let

[math]f(y,y^{\prime},x) \equiv \sqrt{1+y^{\prime}(x)^2}[/math]

the path integral can now be written in terms of dx such that

[math]S= \int_{(x_1)}^{(x_2)} f(y,y^{\prime},x) dx[/math]


To consider deviation away from [math]y(x)[/math] the function [math]\eta(x)[/math] is introduced to denote deviations away from the shortest line and the parameter [math]\alpha[/math] is introduced to weight that deviation

[math]\eta(x)[/math] = the difference between the current curve and the shortest path.

let

[math]Y(x) = y(x) + \alpha \eta(x)[/math] = A path that is not the shortest path between two points.


let

[math]S(\alpha)= \int_{(x_1)}^{(x_2)} f(Y,Y^{\prime},x) dx[/math]
[math]= \int_{(x_1)}^{(x_2)} f(y+\alpha \eta,y^{\prime}+ \alpha \eta^{\prime},x) dx[/math]

the deviations in the various paths can be expressed in terms of a differential of the above integral for the path length with respect to the parameter [math]\alpha[/math] as this parameter changes the deviation

[math]\frac{\partial}{\partial \alpha} f(y+\alpha \eta,y^{\prime}+ \alpha \eta^{\prime},x) = \frac{\partial y}{\partial \alpha}\frac{\partial f}{\partial y}+\frac{\partial y^{\prime}}{\partial \alpha} \frac{\partial f}{\partial y^{\prime}}= \eta \frac{\partial f}{\partial y}+\eta^{\prime} \frac{\partial f}{\partial y^{\prime}}[/math]


[math]\frac{dS(\alpha)}{d \alpha}=\frac{d}{d \alpha} \int_{(x_1)}^{(x_2)} f(Y,Y^{\prime},x) dx[/math]
[math]= \int_{(x_1)}^{(x_2)} \frac{d}{d \alpha}f(y+\alpha \eta,y^{\prime}+ \alpha \eta^{\prime},x) dx[/math]
[math]= \int_{(x_1)}^{(x_2)} \left ( \eta \frac{\partial f}{\partial y}+\eta^{\prime} \frac{\partial f}{\partial y^{\prime}} \right )dx[/math]
[math]= \int_{(x_1)}^{(x_2)} \left ( \eta \frac{\partial f}{\partial y} \right ) + \int_{(x_1)}^{(x_2)} \left ( \eta^{\prime} \frac{\partial f}{\partial y^{\prime}} \right )dx[/math]


The second integral above can by evaluated using integration by parts as

let

[math]u = \frac{\partial f}{\partial y^{\prime}} \;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\; dv = \eta^{\prime} dx[/math]
[math]du = \frac{d}{dx} \left ( \frac{\partial f}{\partial y^{\prime}} \right ) \;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\; v=\eta [/math]
[math]\int_{(x_1)}^{(x_2)} \left ( \eta^{\prime} \frac{\partial f}{\partial y^{\prime}} \right )dx = \left [ \eta \frac{\partial f}{\partial y^{\prime}} \right ]_{x_1}^{x_2} - \int_{(x_1)}^{(x_2)} \eta \frac{d}{dx} \left ( \frac{\partial f}{\partial y^{\prime}} \right )dx [/math]


[math]\left [ \eta \frac{\partial f}{\partial y^{\prime}} \right ]_{x_1}^{x_2} = \left [ \eta \frac{y^{\prime}(x)}{ \sqrt{1+y^{\prime}(x)^2} } \right ]_{x_1}^{x_2} [/math] :[math]f(y,y^{\prime},x) \equiv \sqrt{1+y^{\prime}(x)^2}[/math]
[math]= \left ( \eta(x_2) - \eta(x_1) \right ) \frac{y^{\prime}(x)}{ \sqrt{1+y^{\prime}(x)^2}} [/math]
the difference between the end points should be zero because [math]\eta(x_1) = \eta(x_2)[/math] to keep be sure that the endpoints are the same


[math]\int_{(x_1)}^{(x_2)} \left ( \eta^{\prime} \frac{\partial f}{\partial y^{\prime}} \right )dx = 0 - \int_{(x_1)}^{(x_2)} \eta \frac{d}{dx} \left ( \frac{\partial f}{\partial y^{\prime}} \right )dx [/math]


[math]\frac{dS(\alpha)}{d \alpha}=\frac{d}{d \alpha} \int_{(x_1)}^{(x_2)} f(Y,Y^{\prime},x) dx[/math]
[math]= \int_{(x_1)}^{(x_2)} \left ( \eta \frac{\partial f}{\partial y} \right ) - \int_{(x_1)}^{(x_2)} \eta \frac{d}{dx} \left ( \frac{\partial f}{\partial y^{\prime}} \right )dx [/math]
[math]= \int_{(x_1)}^{(x_2)} \eta \left [ \left ( \frac{\partial f}{\partial y} \right ) - \frac{d}{dx} \left ( \frac{\partial f}{\partial y^{\prime}} \right ) \right ] dx [/math]


The above integral is equivalent to

[math]\int \eta(x) g(x) = 0[/math]


For the above to be true for any function [math]\eta(x)[/math] then it follows that [math]g(x)[/math] should be zero


[math] \left [ \left ( \frac{\partial f}{\partial y} \right ) - \frac{d}{dx} \left ( \frac{\partial f}{\partial y^{\prime}} \right ) \right ] =0 [/math]


[math]f(y,y^{\prime},x) \equiv \sqrt{1+y^{\prime}(x)^2}[/math]


[math]\frac{\partial f}{\partial y} = \frac{\partial }{\partial y} \sqrt{1+y^{\prime}(x)^2} = 0 [/math]
[math] \frac{d}{dx} \left ( \frac{\partial f}{\partial y^{\prime}} \right ) = \frac{d}{dx} \left ( \frac{\partial ( \sqrt{1+y^{\prime}(x)^2})}{\partial y^{\prime}} \right ) = \frac{\partial f}{\partial y} = 0 [/math]
[math] \Rightarrow \left ( \frac{\partial ( \sqrt{1+y^{\prime}(x)^2})}{\partial y^{\prime}} \right ) [/math]= Constant
[math] \frac{y^{\prime}(x)}{ \sqrt{1+y^{\prime}(x)^2}} = C [/math]
[math] \left ( y^{\prime}(x)\right )^2=C^2 \left ( 1+y^{\prime}(x)^2\right ) [/math]
[math] \left (1 - C^2 \right ) \left ( y^{\prime(x) }\right )^2=C^2 [/math]
[math] \left ( y^{\prime}(x)\right )^2=\frac{C^2}{1 - C^2) } [/math]
[math] y^{\prime}(x)=\sqrt{\frac{C^2}{1 - C^2) } } \equiv m[/math]

integrating

[math]y =mx+b[/math]


http://scipp.ucsc.edu/~haber/ph5B/fermat09.pdf

Euler-Lagrange Equation

The Euler- Lagrange Equation is written as

[math] \left [ \left ( \frac{\partial f}{\partial y} \right ) - \frac{d}{dx} \left ( \frac{\partial f}{\partial y^{\prime}} \right ) \right ] =0 [/math]


the above becomes a condition for minimizing the "Action"


Problem 6.16


Brachistochrone problem

Shortest distance betwen two points revisited

Let's consider the problem of determining the shortest distance between two points again.

Previously we determined the shortest distance by assuming only two variables. One was the independent variable [math]x[/math] and the other was dependent on [math]x[/math] ([math] y(x)[/math]).


What happens if the above assumption is relaxed.

To consider all possible paths between two point we should write the path in parameteric form

[math] x=x(u) \;\;\;\;\;\; y = y(u)[/math]

The functions above are assumed to be continuous and have continuous second derivatives.

Note
the above parameterization includes our previous assumption of the variables if we just let [math]u=x[/math].
Other examples
[math] x=u \;\;\;\;\;\; y = u^2 \;\;\;\;\ \Rightarrow y = x^2 =[/math] parabola
[math] x=\sin u \;\;\;\;\;\; y = \cos u \;\;\;\;\ \Rightarrow x^2 + y^2 =1 =[/math]circle
[math] x=a\sin u \;\;\;\;\;\; y = b\cos u \;\;\;\;\ \Rightarrow [/math]ellips
[math] x=a\sec u \;\;\;\;\;\; y = b\tan u \;\;\;\;\ \Rightarrow [/math]hyperbola

The length of a small segment of the path is given by


[math]ds = \sqrt{dx^2 + dy^2}= \sqrt{x^{\prime}(u)^2 + y^{\prime}(u)^2}[/math]


now instead of

[math]f(y,y^{\prime},x) \equiv \sqrt{1+y^{\prime}(x)^2}[/math]

you have

[math]f(x(u),y(u),x^{\prime}(u),y^{\prime}(u),u) \equiv \sqrt{x^{\prime}(u)^2 + y^{\prime}(u)^2} [/math]

and the path integral changes from

[math]S= \int_{(x_1)}^{(x_2)} f(y,y^{\prime},x) dx[/math]

to


[math]L = \int_{u_1}^{u_2} \sqrt{x^{\prime}(u)^2 + y^{\prime}(u)^2} du =\int_{u_1}^{u_2} f(x(u),y(u),x^{\prime}(u),y^{\prime}(u),u)du[/math]


the same arguments are made again

instead of


[math]Y(x) = y(x) + \alpha \eta(x)[/math]


You now have


[math] y = y(u) + \alpha \eta(u) \;\;\;\;\;\;\;\; x(u) + \beta \xi(u) [/math]


instead of

[math]S(\alpha)= \int_{(x_1)}^{(x_2)} f(Y,Y^{\prime},x) dx[/math]
[math]= \int_{(x_1)}^{(x_2)} f(y+\alpha \eta,y^{\prime}+ \alpha \eta^{\prime},x) dx[/math]


you now have

[math]S(\alpha,\beta)= \int_{(u_1)}^{(u_2)} f(x(u),y(u),x^{\prime}(u),y^{\prime}(u),u)du[/math]
[math]= \int_{(u_1)}^{(u_2)} f(x(u) + \beta \xi(u),x^{\prime}(u) + \beta \xi^{\prime}(u),y(u)+\alpha \eta(u),y^{\prime}(u)+ \alpha \eta^{\prime}(u),u) du[/math]


If you require that the integral not deviate from the shortest path between two points (i.e. it is stationary) Then you are requiring that the integral from path segments that deviate from the shortest path satisfies the equation

[math]\frac{\partial S}{\partial \alpha} = 0\;\;\;\;[/math] and [math]\;\;\;\;\;\frac{\partial S}{\partial \beta} = 0[/math]

when

[math]\alpha \mbox{and} \beta = 0[/math] for any function [math]\eta(u)[/math] and [math]\xi(u)[/math] that vanish at the endpoints [math]u_1[/math] and [math]u_2[/math]


insert problem 6.26


https://www.fields.utoronto.ca/programs/scientific/12-13/Marsden/FieldsSS2-FinalSlidesJuly2012.pdf

Forest_Ugrad_ClassicalMechanics