Difference between revisions of "Forest UCM Osc HookesLaw"
Line 171: | Line 171: | ||
==Oscillator properties== | ==Oscillator properties== | ||
+ | |||
+ | :<math> x = Ae^{i \omega t} + Be^{-i\omega t} </math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | Using Euler's formula for complex variables | ||
+ | |||
+ | :<math>e^{\pm ix} = \cos(x) \pm i \sin(x)</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | :<math>\Rightarrow x = A\left ( \cos(x) + i \sin(x)\right ) + B\left ( \cos(x) - i \sin(x)\right )</math> | ||
+ | ::: <math>= (A + B) \cos (\omega t) + i(A-B) \sin(\omega t)</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
Revision as of 21:06, 1 October 2014
Hooke's Law
Derivation
Equation of Motion from Cons of Energy
In the previous chapter Forest_UCM_Energy_Line1D, we saw how the equations of motion could from the requirement that Energy be conserved.
in 1-D
Let consider the case where an object is oscillating about a point of stability
A Taylor expansion of the Potential function U(x) about the equilibrium point
is
Further consider the case the the potential is symmetric about the equilibrium point
at the equilibrium point
- : Force = 0 at equilibrium
in order to have stable equilibrium
- : stable equilibirium
also the odd (2n-1) terms must be zero in order to have stable equilibrium for a symmetric potential (the potential needs to be a max at the end points of the motion).
- :
and the leading term is just a constant which can be dropped by redefining the zero point of the potential
This leaves us with
if we make the following definitions
and that the equailibrium point is located at the orgin
Then
Since we began this derivation with the assumption that energy was conserved then the force must be conservative such that
or this 1-D force can be written as
Interpretation (Hooke's law)
Returning back to the conservation of energy equation
Lets consider only the first term in the expansion of the potential U(x)
- energy is constant with time
- energy is constant with time
A Force exerted by a spring is proportional to the spring displacement from equilibrium and is directed towards restoring the equilibrium condition. (a linear restoring force).
In 1-D this force may be written as
While the above was derived from the assumption of conservation of energy we can apply our two tests for conservative forces as a double check:
1.) The force only depends on position.
2.) The work done is independent of path (
in 1-D and 3-D)
Equation of motion
In solving the differential equation
- energy is constant with time
and observe that the above differential equation is a special case of the more general differential equation
- energy is constant with time
one could rewrite the above as
One could cast the above differential equation into an analogous quadratic equation if you
let
then the analogous equation becomes
where m, a, and k are constants
factoring this quadratic you would have
where a non-trivial solution would exist if one of the terms in the parentheses were zero
this basically reduces our 2nd order differential equation down to two first order differential equations
one of the solutions would be
For the special case where there isn't a first derivative term (a=0)
You simply have
or
then you have
Oscillator properties
Using Euler's formula for complex variables
http://www.casaxps.com/help_manual/mathematics/Mechanics3_rev12.pdf