Difference between revisions of "Forest UCM Energy PE n ConsForces"
Line 64: | Line 64: | ||
=Aside on non-conservative Lorentz force= | =Aside on non-conservative Lorentz force= | ||
− | + | Given the experience of air frictions dependence on velocity, classical mechanic may argue that the velocity dependence of the Lorentz Force's magnetic term is also non-conservative | |
+ | |||
+ | for example: | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | You can have systems where the magnetic field causes polarizable atoms to realign and as a result heat can be produced converting energy in the system to a form that would need to be tractable in order to conserve energy, | ||
+ | |||
+ | But there is a special class of velocity dependent forces ( in particular forces that act perpendicular to an objects velocity) where a Hamiltonian can be formed and as a result the Energy is constant. The result of forming such a Hamiltonia is that an additional term is added to the kinetic energy part of the Hamiltonian that comes from the ability to define a magnetic vector potential<math> (\vec{A})</math>. | ||
ie | ie |
Revision as of 12:23, 22 September 2014
Potential Energy and Conservative Forces
Conservative Forces
What is a conservative Force?
Two conditions are neccessary for a Force to be conservative.
- The force on depends on the objects position (F = F(r)). Not on time nor velocity
- The work done by the force in displacing the object between two points is independent of the path taken.
Examples of conservative forces
Examples of Non Conservaive Forces
Potential Energy
If ALL External forces are conservative
Then a potential energy U(r) may be defined such that the total energy of the system is constant (conserved)
- constant
where
and
- an arbitrary reference point where the potential is often chosen to be zero
It is not necessary to define the potential as zero at
- remember
- Positive Work INcreases the kinetic energy (T) but DEcreases the Potential energy (U)
- Negative Work DEcreases the kinetic energy (T) but INcreases the Potential energy (U)
conservation of mechanical enegy
Let
and
be any two points used to locate and object.
the work done to move an object from an arbitrary reference point
to maybe be written as- constant
Aside on non-conservative Lorentz force
Given the experience of air frictions dependence on velocity, classical mechanic may argue that the velocity dependence of the Lorentz Force's magnetic term is also non-conservative
for example:
You can have systems where the magnetic field causes polarizable atoms to realign and as a result heat can be produced converting energy in the system to a form that would need to be tractable in order to conserve energy,
But there is a special class of velocity dependent forces ( in particular forces that act perpendicular to an objects velocity) where a Hamiltonian can be formed and as a result the Energy is constant. The result of forming such a Hamiltonia is that an additional term is added to the kinetic energy part of the Hamiltonian that comes from the ability to define a magnetic vector potential
.ie
but
http://lamp.tu-graz.ac.at/~hadley/ss1/IQHE/cpimf.php
http://insti.physics.sunysb.edu/itp/lectures/01-Fall/PHY505/09c/notes09c.pdf
http://www.tcm.phy.cam.ac.uk/~bds10/aqp/lec5.pdf
You can have systems where the magnetic field causes polarizable atoms to realign and as a result heat can be produced converting energy in the system to a form that would need to be tractable in order to conserve energy,
http://www.researchgate.net/post/Is_magnetic_force_a_conservative_or_non-conservative_force