Difference between revisions of "Bull"

From New IAC Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 30: Line 30:
 
'''physics law'''
 
'''physics law'''
  
There is no physics in nature, when people come the physics come then
+
*Nature -> measurements (people are doing) -> incomplete information -> physics
 
+
*There is nature which does not care about physics. The physics law reflect the incomplete information which  people have through measurements about nature
Nature -> measurements (done by people) -> information -> physics
 

Revision as of 20:29, 22 May 2013

go back


  • Do you think it is real that electron can be simultaneously in several places, like QM told to us?
  • Do we really understand why electron does not radiate when it orbits around the atomic nuclei?
  • Do we really understand why the low of classical electrodynamics does not apply to atom?
  • Will electron radiate when it travels in curved space-time?


wave function?

  • QM interpretation: w.f. describes the particle (probability to find the particles in certain place and certain time etc...)
  • Bayesian interpretation: w.f. describes the incomplete information about the particle


measurements

The all troubles in physics comes because people talk in different languages (Tower of Babel)

[math] y = \Theta + x [/math]

  • [math]\Theta[/math] - phenomenon, nature;
  • x - noise
  • y - measurement


physics law

  • Nature -> measurements (people are doing) -> incomplete information -> physics
  • There is nature which does not care about physics. The physics law reflect the incomplete information which people have through measurements about nature