Difference between revisions of "Optimization of Positron Capturing"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
= Optimization with ELEGANT Simulation on the Region from Gun Exit to Tungsten Target = | = Optimization with ELEGANT Simulation on the Region from Gun Exit to Tungsten Target = | ||
− | <math> \epsilon_{x,y} = 13 \mu m</math> (Not sure yet, need to be calculated) | + | Emittance: <math> \epsilon_{x,y} = 13~\mu m</math> (Not sure yet, need to be calculated) |
+ | |||
+ | Average Peak <math> Q = 14~pC </math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | Beam Energy: <math> 10~MeV </math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | Energy Spread: <math> \sigma_{\delta}=4.23% </math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | Alpha Function: <math> \alpha = </math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | Beta Function: <math> \beta = </math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | RMS longitudinal Bunch Length: <math> \sigma_{z} = 10.6~ps</math> |
Revision as of 18:21, 14 April 2011
- Thickness of the Tungsten target: 1.25 mm
- Beam size at Tungsten target: Gaussian,
Optimization with ELEGANT Simulation on the Region from Gun Exit to Tungsten Target
Emittance:
(Not sure yet, need to be calculated)Average Peak
Beam Energy:
Energy Spread:
Alpha Function:
Beta Function:
RMS longitudinal Bunch Length: