PePPO NaI PositronDetector 4 JLab

Detector setup for a NaI positron detector for PePPO

NaI detector

The PMT is powered by a HV supply which should have a DC ripple less than 200 mV peak-to-peak at 3kV/3mA. A DC ripple will change the gain of the PMT and cause the energy resolution to deteriorate.

The Linearity of the detector system is another way to reduce the energy resolution. The measured PMT output should be linear with the input signal when the gain is constant. This linearity can be measured using 2 radiation sources.

Input HV: +1085 V

Input Current: 2.362 mA

Running CODA: Running CODA

Measurements Using V792 QDC

Run 1979

Start Time : March 23:12:30:26

End Time: March 23: 13:10:47

Elapsed time: 2421 seconds

Run 1980

Remove Na-22 source from top of NaI crystal.

Start Time : March 23:13:11:23

End Time: March 23: 15:56:40

Elapsed Time:6317 seconds

Let's lower the gain of the Phillips 777 amplifier so the 511 peak is around channel 500. This way the 1 MeV photons may come on scale.

Run 1982

Overnight Cosmic Run

Start Time : March 23: 16:01:47

End Time: March 24: 09:41:31

Elapsed Time:63558 seconds

Run 1983

Start a run using Co-60

Start Time : March 24: 09:46:25

End Time: March 24: 10:14:24

Elapsed Time: 1679 seconds

The 1.x MeV gammas appear near channel 1200.

I'll do a long Na-22 run and think about upping the amplifier gain again to put the Co-60 peak around channel 3000.

The Co-60 source trigger rate is about 750 Hz and the Na-22 trigger rate was about 450 Hz.

Run 1984

Start a run using Na-22

Start Time : March 24: 10:16:49

End Time: March 24: 11:02:38

Elapsed Time: seconds

Run 1987

Increase gain of Phillips 777 amplifier which 
I am using on the PMT output,  We may want to adjust 
the dynode gain/discriminator to fill in the lower 
energy part of the spectrum.

Start a run using Na-22

Start Time : March 24: 11:34:35

End Time: March 24: 1 Elapsed Time: seconds

I was expecting to see a photon of energy 1.17 and one with 1.33 MeV in the above specturm. Assuming that my ability to resolve the two peaks is due to noise I will assume both are in the peak at channel [math]3158 \pm 1[/math]. Since the intensity of the above two lines are almost the same I will do a simple average.

[math]\bar{E_{\gamma}} =\frac{1.17 + 1.33}{2} =1.25 [/math] MeV

The above measurement indicates that a 1.25 MeV photon appears at channel [math]3158\pm 1[/math] in the current apparatus.

Run 1988

Start a run using Na-22

Start Time : March 24: 11:34:35

End Time: March 24: 16:21:31

Elapsed Time: 17216 seconds

The above measurement indicates that a 0.511 MeV photon appears at channel [math]1839 \pm 0.1[/math] in the current apparatus.

Run 1989

Start a run using Co-60

Start Time : March 24: 16:23:30

End Time: March 24: 16:57:00

Elapsed Time: 2010 seconds

The above measurement indicates that a 1.25 MeV photon appears at channel [math]3256 \pm 0.8[/math] previously it was at [math]3158\pm 1[/math] in the current apparatus.

The 98 channel difference is beyond the fit statistic.

Taking the average of the two give 3207 Channels.

Energy Calibration using run 1987-1989

Summary of Apparatus Specs

JLab PMT at +1185 Volts, 2.6 mA.

Dynode is inverted by Ortec 474 timing filter amplifier set to unity gain. The Ortec output is put through a Lecroy Model 4608C discriminator set to -44.8 mV.

Anode is amplified by a Phillips 777 fast Amp. Gained measured to be XXXXX

Doing a Linear fit using the two points

1.25 MeV ,3207 Channels

0.511 MeV , 1839 Channles

gives

Channels = 893.06 + 1851.2 MeV

The energy distributions measured do not appear to have the expected structure. There is a 1.3 MeV energy gamma from the Na-22 source which was expected but only hinted at. Its intensity is 10% but it should start to show up on long runs.

The next goal will be to lower the dynode discriminator threshold so we trigger on lower energy events. Does the Compton edge become more obvious for Na-22?

I think my trigger threshold on the dynode is cutting things off at 200 keV.

Run 1990

Overnight Cosmic run

Start Time : March 24: 17:22:38

End Time: March 25: 09:14:44

Elapsed Time: seconds

Gain

Amplifier gain measurement for runs 1987-1989 using a 1.5 Volt battery

Changed integrate pulse width to 43 nsec

Run 1992: Battery going directly into ADC appear near channel 523

Run 1993: had battery through amp but forgot to plug in ADC, I'll take another run so interpretation is simple.

Run 1994: 1.5 Volt battery going into amplifier then ADC appears near channel 2190

so gain is 2188/523 = 4.18

Maybe I can increase the HV on the PMT to run without an amplifier and reduce my noise.

run 1995 Co-60 no amp

No Amplifier

Start a run using Co-60

Start Time : March 25: 09:46:23

End Time: March 25: 10:23:45

Elapsed Time: seconds

run 1996 Na-22 no amp

No Amplifier

Start a run using Na-22

Start Time : March 25: 10:26:43

End Time: March 25: 14:42:19

Elapsed Time: seconds

run 1997 Na-22 no amp

Increase HV on PMT from 1185 to 1250 Volts

Start a run using Na-22

Start Time : March 25: 14:43:55

End Time: March 25: 14:58:04

Elapsed Time: seconds

run 1998 Co-60 no amp

Increase HV on PMT from 1185 to 1250 Volts

Start a run using Co-60

Start Time : March 25: 15:09:30

End Time: March 25:

Elapsed Time: seconds

Rate was 5kHz and the ROC crashed

Move source farther away to lower rate

run 2000 Co-60 no amp

Increase HV on PMT from 1185 to 1250 Volts, 2.74 mA

Source moved 7.5 cm away from NaI to lower counting rate.

Start a run using Co-60

Start Time : March 25: 15:20:29

End Time: March 25: 15:26:54

Elapsed Time: seconds

run 2001 Na-22 no amp

Increase HV on PMT from 1185 to 1250 Volts, 2.74 mA

Source moved 7.5 cm away from NaI to lower counting rate.

Start a run using Na-22

Start Time : March 25: 15:28:13

End Time: March 25: 15:33:00

Elapsed Time: seconds

run 2002 Na-22 no amp

Increase HV on PMT from 1250 to 1350 Volts, 2.96 mA

Source moved 7.5 cm away from NaI to lower counting rate.

Start a run using Na-22

Start Time : March 25: 15:34:50

End Time: March 25: 15:38:54

Elapsed Time: seconds

run 2003 Co-60 no amp

Increase HV on PMT from 1250 to 1350 Volts, 2.96 mA

Source moved 7.5 cm away from NaI to lower counting rate.

Start a run using Co-60

Start Time : March 25:

End Time: March 25:

Elapsed Time: seconds

run 2004 Na-22 no amp

Increase HV on PMT from 1350 to 1430 Volts, 3.1 mA

Source moved 7.5 cm away from NaI to lower counting rate.

Start a run using Na-22

Start Time : March 25: 15:46:23

End Time: March 25: 15:52:06

Elapsed Time: seconds

Looks like I was running at too low of a HV, that is why the spectra did not make sense above, I now see 2 peaks for Co-60 that are close together. What were those high energy peaks? Lets check the counting rate.

run 2005 Co-60 no amp

Increase HV on PMT from 1350 to 1430 Volts, 3.1 mA

Source moved 10.1 cm away from NaI to lower counting rate.

Start a run using Co-60

Start Time : March 25: 15:53:05

End Time: March 25: 16:03:24

Elapsed Time: seconds

run 2006 Na-22 no amp

Increase HV on PMT from 1350 to 1430 Volts, 3.1 mA

Source moved 10.1 cm away from NaI to lower counting rate.

Start a run using Na-22

Start Time : March 25: 16:04:16

End Time: March 25: 16:

Elapsed Time: seconds

Channe = -540.15 + 1279.2 HeV

Readout

F250

JLab's F250 flash ADC will be used to measure the NaI output

Na-22 source

North American Scientific Model CAL2600

Activity = 9.803 \muCi on 5/1/05

Serial Number 64236

Na-22 beta decays giving off a 215 keV KE beta and a 1.275 MeV photon.

http://atom.kaeri.re.kr/cgi-bin/decay?Na-22%20EC

Co-60 source

North American Scientific Model CAL2600

Activity = 9.641 \muCi on 5/1/05

Serial Number 64120

Co-60: decays to Ni giving 2 dominant gamma lines at 1.173237( 4) and 1.332501( 5) MeV. The Average Beta energy is 95 keV.

Co-60DecayChain.png

http://atom.kaeri.re.kr/cgi-bin/decay?Co-60%20B-

Positrons#Experiments