Revision as of 22:29, 24 February 2009

A PDF version of the RFP is given below

Media:NEUP_RFP_2008.pdf

Proposal Due date: March 16,2009

Go/NoGo requirements

Commitment to reporting
If DOE Lab Work and safety Health program
Export Control
Standard Research Subcontract
Quality Assurance if non-academic partner
commitment to prepare additional contracts

Proposal Outline

Title:

Technical Work Scope and Mission Relevance

Proposed scope description and Scientific Merit

Research Plan Tasks to accomplish scope

Milestones and Deliverables

R&D resources and Capabilities

Timeline

Roles of Participants and Team Qualifications

Participant A = D.Dale = Manager Photofission physics Participant B = V. Starovoitova = Data analysis expert Participant C = T. Forest = DAQ, beam line design Participant D = P. Cole = beamline instrumentation, expert complainer

Students = 2 PhD theses + 2 MS theses, 2 undergrad training

Work Scope Challenges and expected innovations

Documentation procedures

Quality Assurance

Budget form

Proposal Graphs

The time of flight measured by detector A. The unhatched histogram represents the flight time observed when a D2O target is used while the hatched histogram is observed when using the H2O target

overall apparatus

brem target

experimental cell closeup. Need to fix the e+/e- orbits to look the same. One of the particles will remain in the B-field while the other escapes.

Revision as of 22:28, 24 February 2009 (view source) Oborn (talk \| contribs) (→‎Roles of Participants and Team Qualifications) ← Older edit		Revision as of 22:29, 24 February 2009 (view source) Oborn (talk \| contribs) (→‎Roles of Participants and Team Qualifications) Newer edit →
Line 39:		Line 39:


−	Students = 2 PhD theses + 2 MS theses, undergrad training	+	Students = 2 PhD theses + 2 MS theses, 2 undergrad training

	==Work Scope Challenges and expected innovations==		==Work Scope Challenges and expected innovations==

Difference between revisions of "NEUPRFP 2009"